A Relational Communication Strategy for Successful Collaborative Innovation in Business-to-Business Markets

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter contributes to our understanding of interorganisational relationships (IORs) through the presentation of a relational communication strategy that incorporates a set of propositions about the features and mechanisms of the communication process in successful collaborative innovation. We propose that relational communication provides the lubrication to the process of collaborative innovation facilitating border-less interaction between parties. We examine the nature of collaborative innovation and the importance of communication to collaborative innovation’s effective functioning in relationships. Features of our relational communication strategy in densely knit partnerships considered to be important in a successful collaborative innovation setting, include: (1) high frequency, bidirectionality, informality, and indirect modalities; (2) high communication quality, dense participation, and openness of information sharing of tacit and implicit knowledge; and (3) a shared meaning base and an open communication climate. The mechanisms that we propose that firms can and do use to increase the effectiveness of communication in successful collaborative innovation include: (1) interpersonal modes of communication and affiliation; (2) loose team structures; (3) electronic virtual communities and open information repositories; and (4) interorganisational communities of practice. Numerous examples and case vignettes are presented in order to support the need to focus attention on these issues.

Keywords

Tacit Knowledge Virtual Community Relational Communication Boundary Spanner Collaborative Innovation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Andersen, P. H., & Drejer, I. (2009). Together we share? Competitive and collaborative supplier interests in product development. Technovation, 29(10), 690–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Athaide, G., & Klink, R. R. (2009). Managing seller-buyer relationships during new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(5), 566–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Athaide, G., & Zhang, J. Q. (2011). The determinants of seller-buyer interactions during new product development in technology-based industrial markets. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(1), 146–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldwin, C., & von Hippel, E. (2011). Modeling a paradigm shift: From producer innovation to user and open innovation. Organizational Science, 22(6), 1399–1417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barnett, G. A. (1988). Communication and Organizational Culture. In G. M. Goldhaber & G. A. Barnett (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Communication, chapter 6, (pp.101–30). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  6. Barry, B., & Crant, J. M. (2000). Dyadic communication relationships in organizations: An attribution/expectancy approach. Organization Science, 11(6), 648–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biemans, W. (1992). Managing innovation within networks. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social-practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2), 198–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bugge, K-E., O’Gorman, B., Hill, I., Welter, F. (2010). Regional sustainability, innovation and welfare through an Adaptive Process Model. In J. Sarkis, J. J. Cordeiro & D. Vazquez Brust (Eds.), Facilitating Sustainable Innovation through Collaboration (pp. 77–96). Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Burgoon, J. K., & Hale, J. L. (1984). The fundamental topoi of relational communication. Communication Monographs, 51(3), 193–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bush, A. A., & Tiwana, A. (2005). Designing sticky knowledge networks. Communications of the ACM, 48(5), 67–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cousins, P. D., Lawson, B., Petersen, K. J., & Handfield, R. B. (2011). Breakthrough scanning, supplier knowledge exchange, and new product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(6), 930–942.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. In B. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behaviour (pp. 191–233). Greenwich: JAI.Google Scholar
  14. Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science, 32(5), 554–571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duncan, T., & Moriarty, S. E. (1998). A communication-based marketing model for managing relationships. Journal of Marketing, 62(2), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ganesan, S., Malter, A. J., & Rindfleisch, A. (2005). Does distance still matter? Geographic proximity and new product development. Journal of Marketing, 69(4), 44–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gassmann, O., Enkel, E., & Chesbrough, H. (2010). The future of open innovation. R&D Management, 40(3), 213–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Håkansson, H., & Eriksson, A. K. (1993). Getting innovations out of supplier networks. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 1(3), 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hansen, M. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 83–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hansen, M. T., Mors, M. L., & Løvås, B. (2005). Knowledge sharing in organizations: Multiple networks, multiple phases. Academy of Management Journal, 48(5), 776–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hatch, M. J. (1993). The dynamics of organizational culture. Academy of Management Review, 18(4), 657–693.Google Scholar
  22. Hienerth, C., & Lettl, C. (2011). Exploring how peer communities enable lead user innovations to become standard equipment in the industry: Community pull effects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(1), 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hillebrand, B., & Biemans, W. G. (2004). Links between internal and external cooperation in product development: An exploratory study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(2), 110–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Holden, M. T., & O’Toole, T. (2004a). A quantitative exploration of communication’s role in determining the governance of manufacturer-retailer relationships. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(6), 539–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holden, M. T., & O’Toole, T. (2004b). Affirming communication’s primary role in a manufacturer-retailer context. Journal of Marketing Management, 20(9/10), 1047–1073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Homans, G. C. (1958). Social behavior as exchange. American Journal of Sociology, 63(6), 597–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jablin, F. M. (1979). Superior-subordinate communication: The state of the art. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 1201–1222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Johnsen, T. E. (2009). Supplier involvement in new product development and innovation: Taking stock and looking to the future. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 15(3), 187–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kelliher, F., Foley, A., & Frampton, A. M. (2009). Facilitating small firm learning networks in the Irish tourism sector. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 9(1), 80–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Krone, K. J., Jablin, F. M., & Putnam, L. L. (1987). Communication theory and organizational communication: Multiple perspectives. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 18–40). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  31. Lynch, P., Holden, M. T., Foley, A., Harrington, D., Hussey, J. (2013). Engaging entrepreneurs with a blended learning degree programme. In C. Wankel & P. Blessinger (Eds.), Increasing student engagement and retention in e-learning environments: Web 2.0 and blended learning technologies. Emerald Publishing: Bingley.Google Scholar
  32. Lynch, P., & O’Toole, T. (2010). A critical episode analysis of the dynamics of the interaction atmosphere in a new product development relationship. The IMP Journal, 4(2), 106–130.Google Scholar
  33. Macneil, I. (1980). The new social contract. New Haven: Yale.Google Scholar
  34. Markham, S. K., & Griffin, A. (1998). The breakfast of champions: Associations between champions and product development environments, practices and performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(5), 436–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mason, K., & Leek, S. (2012). Communication practices in a business relationship: Creating, relating and adapting artifacts through time. Industrial Marketing Management, 41, 319–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McGrath, H., & O’Toole, T. (2012). Critical issues in research design in action research in an SME development context. European Journal of Training and Development, 36(5), 508–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mohr, J. J., & Nevin, J. R. (1990). Communication strategies in marketing channels: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Marketing, 54(4), 36–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mohr, J. J., & Spekman, R. E. (1994). Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques. Strategic Management Journal, 15(2), 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Salomonson, N., Åberg, A., & Allwood, J. (2012). Communication skills that support value creation: A study of B2B interactions between customers and customer service representatives. Industrial Marketing Management, 41, 145–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Stohl, C., & Redding, W. C. (1987). Messages and message exchange processes. In F. M. Jablin, L. L. Putnam, K. H. Roberts, & L. W. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of organizational communication (pp. 451–502). Newbury Park: Sage.Google Scholar
  42. Tagliaventi, M. R., & Mattarelli, E. (2006). The role of networks of practice, value sharing, and operational proximity in knowledge flows between professional groups. Human Relations, 59(3), 291–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Uzzi, B., & Lancaster, R. (2003). Relational embeddedness and learning: The case of bank loan managers and their clients. Management Science, 49(4), 383–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. van Echtelt, F. E. A., Wynstra, F., van Weele, A. J., & Duysters, G. (2008). Managing supplier involvement in new product development: A multiple-case study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(2), 180–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Volkswagen, (2011). Group strategy 2018. http://www.volkswagenag.com/content/vwcorp/content/en/the_group/strategy.html. Accessed 17 Apr 2013.
  46. von Hippel, E. (1988). The sources of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  47. von Hippel, E. (1994). “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science, 40(4), 429–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratizing innovation. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  49. Walter, A., & Gemünden, H. G. (2000). Bridging the gap between suppliers and customers through relationship promoters: Theoretical considerations and empirical results. The Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 15(2/3), 86–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wynstra, F., von Corswant, F., & Wetzels, M. (2010). In chains? An empirical study of antecedents of supplier product development activity in the automotive industry. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27, 625–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Waterford Institute of Technology (WIT)WaterfordIreland

Personalised recommendations