Skip to main content

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Earth System Sciences ((BRIEFSEARTHSYST))

  • 284 Accesses

Abstract

The meiobenthos (also called the benthic meiofauna) is a heterogenous group of benthic organisms, both protists and metazoans. Initially distinguished among the benthic organisms on account of their size [as organisms retained on 0.063 (0.032)–1.00 (0.500 or 0.250) mm mesh size sieves], the grouping has become recognised as a distinct ecological category, important by its major contribution to benthic metabolism and secondary production. While marine ecological research usually addresses entire meiobenthic communities considered as assemblages of interacting components represented by high-rank taxonomic units called the major taxa (phyla, orders, families), there is a general awareness of an immense taxonomic richness (diversity) those taxa represent. Whenever detailed taxonomic studies on the meiobenthos have been carried out, a great number of new species, genera and higher-rank taxa has been described. However, the knowledge of this diversity, particularly in the deep sea, is still greatly limited. Ecological research on the meiobenthos revealed the grouping to be a sensitive indicator of environmental changes. Consequently, the meiobenthos is being increasingly frequently used in monitoring and evaluating impacts of factors that disturb the natural state of sedimentary environment. The reliability of such evaluations may be enhanced by refining the resolution of taxonomic analyses and by coupling them with information on functional traits of the meiobenthic taxa present in an assemblage. While such approach is gaining popularity in research on coastal areas, it is still very rare in the deep sea, although the meiobenthos-related variables have been used in evaluating impacts in the deep sea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alves A, Verissimo H, Costa MJ et al (2014) Taxonomic resolution and Biological Traits Analysis (BTA) approaches in estuarine free-living nematodes. Est Coast Shelf Sci 138:69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angel MV, Rice TL (1996) The ecology of the deep ocean and its relevance to global waste management. J Appl Ecol 33:915–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Assunção FM, Vanaverbeke J, van Oevelen D et al (2010) Respiration partitioning in contrasting subtidal sediments: seasonality and response to a spring phytoplankton deposition. Mar Ecol 31:276–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austen MC, McEvoy AJ (1997) The use of offshore meiobenthic communities in laboratory microcosm experiments: response to heavy metal contamination. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 211:247–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austen MC, Widdicombe S (2006) Comparison of the response of meio-and macrobenthos to disturbance and organic enrichment. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 330:96–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austen MC, McEvoy AJ, Warwick RM (1994) The specificity of meiobenthic community responses to different pollutants: results from microcosm experiments. Mar Poll Bull 28:557–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balsamo M, Semprucci F, Frontalini F et al (2012) Meiofauna as a tool for marine ecosystem biomonitoring. In: Cruzado A (ed) Marine ecosystems. InTech, Rijeka. doi:10.5772/34423

  • Berghe WV, Bergmans M (1996) Differential food preferences in three co-occurring species of Tisbe (Copepoda, Harpacticoida). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 4:213–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertasi F, Colangelo MA, Colosio F et al (2009) Comparing efficacy of different taxonomic resolutions and surrogates in detecting changes in soft bottom assemblages due to coastal defence structures. Mar Poll Bull 58:686–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bett BJ (2013) Characteristic benthic size spectra: potential sampling artefacts. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 487:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bett BJ, Narayanaswamy BE (2014) Genera as proxies for species α- and β-diversity: tested across a deep-water Atlantic-Arctic boundary. Mar Ecol. doi:10.1111/maec.12100

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucher G (1985) Long term monitoring of meiofauna densities after the “Amoco Cadiz” oil spill. Mar Poll Bull 16:328–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boucher G, Lambshead PJD (1995) Ecological biodiversity of marine nematodes in samples from temperate, tropical and deep-sea regions. Conserv Biol 9:1594–1604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bremner J, Rogers SI, Frid CLJ (2006) Matching biological traits to environmental conditions in marine benthic ecosystems. J Mar Sys 60:302–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carman KR, Thistle D, Fleeger JW et al (2004) Influence of introduced CO2 on deep-sea metazoan meiofauna. J Oceanog 60:767–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceccherelli VU, Mistri M (1991) Production of the meiobenthic harpacticoid copepod Canuella perplexa. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 68:225–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coull BC (1985) Long-term variability of estuarine meiobenthos: an 11 year study. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 24:205–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danovaro R, Fabiano M, Vincx M (1995) Meiofauna response to the “Agip Abruzzo” oil spill in subtidal sediments of the Ligurian Sea. Mar Poll Bull 30:133–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danovaro R, Dell’Anno A, Pusceddu A et al (2010) The first metazoa living in permanently anoxic conditions. BMC Biol 8(1):30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drgas A (1999) Rola meiofauny w biocenozach dennych Zatoki Gdańskiej ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem wolnożyjących nicieni (Nematoda). PhD thesis, Sea Fisheries Institute, Gdynia

    Google Scholar 

  • Drgas A, Radziejewska T, Warzocha J (1998) Biomass size spectra of near-shore shallow-water benthic communities in the Gulf of Gdańsk (Southern Baltic Sea). PSZN Mar Ecol 19:209–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duplisea DE, Drgas A (1999) Sensitivity of a benthic, metazoan, biomass size spectrum to differences in sediment granulometry. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 177:73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duplisea DE, Hargrave BT (1996) Response of meiobenthic size-structure, biomass and respiration to sediment organic enrichment. Hydrobiologia 339:161–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Essink K, Romeyn K (1994) Estuarine nematodes as indicators of organic pollution: an example from the Ems estuary (the Netherlands). Neth J Aquat Ecol 28:213–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fasham MJR, Baltiño BM, Bowles MC et al (2001) A new vision of ocean giobeochemistry after a decade of the Joint Global Ocean Flux Study (JGOFS). Ambio Spec Rep 10:4–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Feller RJ (1982) Empirical estimates of carbon production from a meiobenthic harpacticoid copepod. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 39:1435–1443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro SP, Cole FA (1990) Taxonomic level and sample size sufficient for assessing pollution impacts on the Southern California Bight macrobenthos. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 67:251–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleeger JW, Palmer MA (1982) Secondary production of the estuarine, meiobenthic copepod Microarthridion littorale. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 7:157–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleeger JW, Carman KR, Weisenhorn PB et al (2006) Simulated sequestration of anthropogenic carbon dioxide at a deep-sea site: effects on nematode abundance and biovolume. Deep Sea Res I 53:1135–1147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fonseca CR, Ganade G (2001) Species functional redundancy, random extinctions and the stability of ecosystems. J Ecol 89:118–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gage JD (1996) Why are there so many species in deep-sea sediments? J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 200:257–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giere O (2009) Meiobenthology. The microscopic fauna in aquatic sediments, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodsell PJ, Underwood AJ, Chapman MG (2009) Evidence necessary for taxa to be reliable indicators of environmental conditions or impacts. Mar Poll Bull 58:323–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray JS (1994) Is deep-sea species diversity really so high? Species diversity of the Norwegian continental shelf. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 112:205–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray JS, Poore GCB, Ugland KI et al (1997) Coastal and deep-sea benthic diversities compared. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 159:97–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green RH (1979) Sampling design and statistical methods for environmental biologists. Wiley & Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Heip C (1980) Meiobenthos as a tool in the assessment of marine environmental quality. Rapp Proc-verb Réun 179:182–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellwig-Armonies M, Armonies W, Lorenzen S (1991) The diet of Enoplus brevis (Nematoda) in a supralittoral salt marsh of the North Sea. Helgol Meeresunters 45:357–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman PMJ, Heip C (1982) Growth and respiration of Cyprideis torosa Jones, 1850 (Crustacea, Ostracoda). Oecologia (Berl) 54:300–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman PMJ, Heip C (1985) Secondary production of the harpacticoid copepod Paronyhocamptus nanus in a brackish-water habitat. Limnol Oceanog 30:1060–1066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman PMJ, Heip C (1988) On the use of meiofauna in ecological monitoring: who needs taxonomy? Mar Poll Bull 19:665–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hummon WD (1977) Introgressive hybridization between two intertidal species of Tetranchyroderma (Gastrotricha, Thaumastodermatidae) with the description of a new species. Mikrofauna Meeresbodens 61:113–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahnke R (1998) Geochemical impacts of waste disposal on the abyssal seafloor. J Mar Sys 14:355–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen P (1987) Feeding ecology of free-living aquatic nematodes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 35:187–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalogeropoulou V, Bett BJ, Gooday AJ et al (2010) Temporal changes (1989–1999) in deep-sea metazoan meiofaunal assemblages on the Porcupine Abyssal Plain, NE Atlantic. Deep Sea Res II 57:1383–1395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller M (1986) Structure des peuplements méiobenthiques dans le secteur pollué par le rejet en mer de l'égout de Marseille. Ann Inst Oceanogr 62:2–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Khripounoff A, Vangriesheim A, Crassous P (1998) Vertical and temporal variations of particle fluxes in the deep tropical Atlantic. Deep-Sea Res I 45:293–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovatch CE, Schizas NV, Chandler GT et al (2000) Tolerance and genetic relatedness of three meiobenthic copepod populations exposed to sediment-associated contaminant mixtures: role of environmental history. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:912–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kristensen RM (1983) Loricifera, a new phylum with aschelminthes characters from the meiobenthos. Zeitschr Zool Syst Evolutionsforsch 21:163–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemonick MD (1995) The last frontier. Time Int 146(7):36–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M (2000) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: recent theoretical advances. Oikos 91:3–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mare MF (1942) A study of a marine benthic community with a special reference to the micro-organisms. J Mar Biol Ass UK 25:517–554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer D (2000) The dark side of taxonomic sufficiency (TS). Mar Poll Bull 40:98–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre AD (1969) Ecology of marine meiobenthos. Biol Rev Cambridge Phil Soc 44:245–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McIntyre A (ed) (2010) Life in the world’s oceans: diversity, distribution, and abundance. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Moens T, Vincx M (1997) Observations on the feeding ecology of estuarine nematodes. J Mar Biol Ass UK 77:211–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moens T, Vierstraete A, Vanhove S et al (1996) A handy method for measuring meiobenthic respiration. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 197:177–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ólafsson E, Elmgren R (1991) Effects of biological disturbance by benthic amphipods Monoporeia affinis on meiobenthic community structure: a laboratory approach. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 74:99–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opaliński KW, Maciejewska K, Urban-Malinga B et al (2010) The oxygen fluxes of sandy littoral areas: quantifying primary and secondary producers in the Baltic Sea. Mar Poll Bull 61:211–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pamatmat MM, Findlay S (1983) Metabolism of microbes, nematodes, polychaetes, and their interactions in sediment, as determined by heat flow measurements. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 11:31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfannkuche O (1993) Benthic response to the sedimentation of particulate organic matter at the BIOTRANS station, 47°N, 20°W. Deep Sea Res II 40:135–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell EN, Crenshaw MA, Rieger RM (1979) Adaptations to sulfide in the meiofauna of the sulfide system. I. 35S-sulfide accumulation and the presence of a sulfide detoxification system. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 37:57–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raffaelli D (1982) An assessment of the potential of major meiofauna groups for monitoring organic pollution. Mar Envir Res 7:151–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riera P, Gremare A, Blanchard G (1996) Food sources of intertidal nematodes in the Bay of Garennes-Oleron (France), as determined by dual stable isotope analysis. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 142:303–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rokicka-Praxmajer J, Radziejewska T, Dworczak H (1998) Meiobenthic communities of the Pomeranian Bay (southern Baltic): effects of proximity to river discharge. Oceanologia 40:243–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Schratzberger M, Warr K, Rogers SI (2007) Functional diversity of nematode communities in the southwestern North Sea. Mar Envir Res 63:368–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwinghamer P (1981) Characteristic size distributions of integral benthic communities. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 38:1255–1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw KM, Lambshead PJD, Platt HM (1983) Detection of pollution-induced disturbance in marine benthic assemblages with special reference to nematodes. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 11:195–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shirayama Y (1992) Respiration rates of bathyal meiobenthos collected using a deep-sea submersible SHINKAI 2000. Deep-Sea Res 39:781–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snelgrove PV (2010) Discoveries of the census of marine life. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Terlizzi A, Bevilacqua S, Fraschetti S et al (2003) Taxonomic sufficiency and the increasing insufficiency of taxonomic expertise. Mar Poll Bull 46:556–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiel H (1983) Meiobenthos and nanobenthos of the deep sea. In: Rowe G (ed) Deep-sea biology. The Sea, 8th edn. Wiley-Interscience, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Thistle D, Lambshead PJD, Sherman KM (1995) Nematode tail-shape groups respond to environmental differences in the deep sea. Vie Milieu 45:107–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Thistle D, Sedlacek L, Carman KR et al (2007a) Emergence in the deep sea: Evidence from harpacticoid copepods. Deep-Sea Res I 54:1008–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thistle D, Sedlacek L, Carman KR et al (2007b) Exposure to carbon dioxide-rich seawater is stressful for some deep-sea species: an in situ, behavioral study. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 340:9–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Urban-Malinga B (2013) Meiobenthos in marine coastal sediments. Geol Soc London, Spec Publ 388. doi:10.1144/SP388.9

  • Van Damme D, Heip C, Willems KA (1984) Influence of pollution on the harpacticoid of two North Sea estuaries. Hydrobiologia 112:143–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Loeff MMR, Lavaleye MSS (1986) Sediments, fauna and the dispersal of radionuclides at the N.E. Atlantic dumpsite for low-level radioactive waste. Report of the Dutch DORA Program, Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Texel

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Gaever S, Moodley L, De Beer D et al (2006) Meiobenthos at the Arctic Håkon Mosby Mud Volcano, with a parental-caring nematode thriving in sulphide-rich sediments. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 321:143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanaverbeke J, Steyaert M, Vanreusel A et al (2003) Nematode biomass spectra as descriptors of functional changes due to human and natural impact. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 249:157–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincx M, Heip C (1987) The use of meiobenthos in pollution monitoring studies. A review. ICES, C.M. E:33

    Google Scholar 

  • Warwick RM (1984) Species size distributions in marine benthic communities. Oecologia (Berl) 61:32–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warwick RM (1988) The level of taxonomic discrimination required to detect pollution effects on marine benthic communities. Mar Poll Bull 19:259–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warwick RM, Collins NR, Gee JM et al (1986) Species size distributions of benthic and pelagic Metazoa: evidence for interaction? Mar Ecol Prog Ser 34:63–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wieser W (1953) Die Beziehung zwischen Mundhohlengestalt, Ernahrungsweise und Vorkommen bei freilebenden marinen Nematoden. Ark Zool 4:439–484

    Google Scholar 

  • Woulds C, Cowie GL, Levin LA et al (2007) Oxygen as a control on sea floor biological communities and their roles in sedimentary carbon cycling. Limnol Oceanog 52:1698–1709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young DK, Richardson MD (1998) Effects of waste disposal on benthic faunal succession on the abyssal seafloor. J Mar Sys 14:319–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teresa Radziejewska .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Radziejewska, T. (2014). Introduction. In: Meiobenthos in the Sub-equatorial Pacific Abyss. SpringerBriefs in Earth System Sciences. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41458-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics