Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Organizational Changes in Forest Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Forests and Rural Development

Part of the book series: Tropical Forestry ((TROPICAL,volume 9))

Abstract

This chapter describes the evolution of forest management organizations in the tropics from pre-colonial times up to the present, based on a review of literature and on case studies. In general, organizations are designed to suit the prevailing political and economic frame conditions. Generic models for forest management organizations are identified. The portfolio of these models is structured according to the sources of their production factors, namely labor, capital and land. Some contemporary organization models are outlined, detailing the inputs, the processes and the outputs. The models’ functions, specific designs and relevance for rural development are stressed. Steering, monitoring and enforcement of capacity are understood as core issues with respect to further development of forest management organizations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Ostrom (1990, p. 90) identified the following principles for enduring common-pool resource institutions: (1) clearly defined boundaries (individuals or households with rights to withdraw resource units from the common-pool resource and the boundaries of the common-pool resource itself are clearly defined); (2) congruence (A. The distribution of benefits from appropriation rules is roughly proportionate to the costs imposed by provision rules. B. Appropriation rules restricting time, place, technology and/or quantity of resource units are related to local conditions); (3) collective-choice arrangements (most individuals affected by operational rules can participate in modifying operational rules); (4) monitoring (monitors, who actively audit common-pool resource conditions and user behavior, are accountable to the users and/or are the users themselves); (5) graduated sanctions (users who violate operational rules are likely to receive graduated sanctions, depending on the seriousness and context of the offence, from other users, from officials accountable to these users, or from both); (6) conflict resolution mechanisms (users and their officials have rapid access to low-cost, local arenas to resolve conflict among users or between users and officials); (7) minimal recognition of rights (the rights of users to devise their own institutions to organize are not challenged by external governmental authorities). For common-pool resources that are part of larger systems: (8) nested enterprises (appropriation, provision, monitoring, enforcement, conflict resolution and governance activities are organized in multiple layers of nested enterprises).

References

  • Adhikari B, Di Falco S, Lovett JC (2004) Household characteristics and forest dependency: evidence from common property forest management in Nepal. Ecol Econ 48(2):245–257. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aggarwal PK, Baethegan WE, Cooper P, Gommes R, Lee B, Meinke H, Rathore LS, Sivakumar MVK (2010) Managing climatic risks to combat land degradation and enhance food security: key information needs. World Climate Conference – 3. Procedia Environ Sci 1:305–312. doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2010.09.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal A (2005) Environmentality: technologies of government and political subjects. Oxford University Press, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen ES (2010) The X model – a tool for describing and assessing individual projects. Int J Manag Proj Bus 3(3):369–386. doi:10.1108/17538371011056039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold J (2001) Forests and people: 25 years of community forestry. http://www.treesforlife.info/fao/Docs/P/25y.pdf. Accessed 11 Apr 2012

  • Ashman D (2001) Civil society collaboration with business: bringing empowerment back in. World Dev 29(7):1097–1113. doi:10.1016/S0305-750×(01)00027-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auch E (2007) Überlebensstrategien waldnutzender Familienwirtschaften im Apuseni-Gebirge, Rumänien – sustainable livelihoods analyse und Handlungsempfehlungen. Schriften aus dem Institut für Forstökonomie der Universität Freiburg, vol 27. Verlag des Instituts für Forstökonomie der Universität Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakarr MI (2005) Forested landscapes and community development: science, scale, and sustainability. In: CIFOR (ed) Towards a shared vision and action frame for community forestry in Liberia. Proceedings of the first international workshop on community forestry in Liberia. CIFOR, Bogor Barat, pp 12–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass SM (1992) Building from the past: forest plantations in history. In: Sargent C, Bass SC (eds) Plantation politics. Forest plantations in development. Earthscan, London, pp 41–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Bastakoti RR (2005) Evaluation of collective action in forest users’ groups (Case study from Dhading District, Nepal). Masterarbeit, Technische Universität Dresden

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhattarai B, Dhungana SP, Kafley GP (2007) Poor-focused common forest management: lessons from Leasehold Forestry in Nepal. J Forest Livelihood 6(2):20–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Binswanger HP, Rosenzweig MR (1986) Behavioural and material determinants of production relations in agriculture. J Dev Stud 22(3):503–539. doi:10.1080/00220388608421994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blank W (2006) Die kolonialwirtschaftliche Forstnutzung der ehemaligen Kolonie Deutsch-Ostafrika. Masterarbeit, Technische Universität Dresden

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley DW (1989) Economic interests and institutions. The conceptual foundations of public policy. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Cairns RI (2000) Outgrower timber schemes in Kwazulu–Natal. Do they build sustainable rural livelihoods and what interventions should be made? Instruments for sustainable private sector forestry, South Africa Series, Pretoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell B, Mandondo A, Nemarundwe N, Sithole B, de Jong W, Luckert M, Matose F (2001) Challenges to proponents of common property resource systems: despairing voices from the social forests of Zimbabwe. World Dev 29(4):589–600. doi:10.1016/S0305-750×(00)00114-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter J, Gronow J (2005) Recent experience in collaborative forest management. A review paper, vol 43, CIFOR occasional paper. CIFOR, Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Chrobok R, Büchi R (1996) Grundbegriffe der organisation – GBO, vol 1, 2nd edn, GfürO-Reihe organisation. Schäffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Coase RH (1937) The nature of the firm. Economia New Ser 4(16):386–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colchester M, Apte T, Laforge M, Madondo A, Pathak N (2003) Bridging the gap: communities, forests and international networks. Synthesis report of the project ‘Learning Lessons from International Community Forestry Networks’. http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/OccPapers/OP-41.pdf. Accessed 31 July 2012

  • Coleman EA, Steed BC (2009) Monitoring and sanctioning in the commons: an application to forestry. Ecol Econ 68(7):2106–2113. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox M, Arnold G, Tomás SV (2010) A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecol Soc 15(4):38

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronkleton P, Guariguata MR, Albornoz MA (2012) Multiple use forestry planning: Timber and Brazil nut management in the community forests of Northern Bolivia. Multiple use of tropical forests: from concept to reality. Forest Ecol Manag 268:49–56. doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2011.04.035

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darr D (2003) Farm forestry in semi-subsistence and monetary economies and its interdependency with the land tenure system – case studies from central Laos. M.Sc. thesis, Technische Universität Dresden

    Google Scholar 

  • David JG (1984) Contract farming and smallholder outgrower schemes in less-developed countries. World Dev 12(11–12):1143–1157. doi:10.1016/0305-750×(84)90008-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhakal B, Bhatta B (2009) An institutional model to explain utilization problems of community forest products. Int J Soc Forest 2(2):23–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon HS (1992) Contract farming in Indonesia. The dairy and rubber industries. In: Glover D, Ghee LT (eds) Contract farming in Southeast Asia. Three country studies. Institute for Advanced Studies, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, pp 119–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Dougill AJ, Soussan JG, Kiff E, Springate-Baginski O, Yadav NP, Dev O, Hurford AP (2001) Impacts of community forestry on farming system sustainability in the Middle Hills of Nepal. Land Degrad Dev 12(3):261–276. doi:10.1002/ldr.438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis F (1992) Peasant economics. Farm households and agrarian development, 2nd edn, Wye studies in agricultural and rural development. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Emery FE, Trist E (1965) The causal texture of organizational environments. Hum Relat 18(1):21–32. doi:10.1177/001872676501800103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (1978) Forestry for local community development, vol 7, Forestry paper. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2001) Forestry out-grower schemes: a global overview. Report based on the work of D. Race and H. Desmond. Forest plantation thematic papers, working paper. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2010) Global forest resources assessment 2010. Main report, vol 163, FAO forestry paper. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaitanids M (2007) Prozessorganisation. Entwicklung, Ansätze und Programme des Managements von Geschäftsprozessen, 2nd edn. Vahlens Handbücher der Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften. Vahlen, München

    Google Scholar 

  • Glover D, Ghee LT (eds) (1992) Contract farming in Southeast Asia. Three country studies, vol 5, Monograph series. Institute for Advanced Studies, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur

    Google Scholar 

  • Guha R (1983) Forestry in British and post-British India: a historical analysis. Econ Polit Wkly 18(44):1882–1896

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartzsch H (1983) Wälder und Forstwirtschaft in der VDR Laos – ein Beitrag zum Stand und zu den Entwicklungstendenzen der laotischen Forstwirtschaft und der forstlichen Ausbildung. Dissertation, Technische Universität Dresden

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobley M (2007) Where in the world is there pro-poor forest policy and tenure reform? http://www.rightsandresources.org/documents/files/doc_658.pdf. Accessed 25 Jan 2012

  • Honadle G (1999) How context matters. Linking environmental policy to people and place. Kumarian Press, West Hartford, Connecticut, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard MMPMDBFLFI (2005) Small-scale timber production in South Africa: what role in reducing poverty? Discussion paper. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), London

    Google Scholar 

  • ITTO (2003) Restoring the forests. Introducing the ITTO guidelines for the restoration, management and rehabilitation of degraded and secondary tropical forests. http://www.itto.int/direct/topics/topics_pdf_download/topics_id=3670000&no=1&disp=inline. Accessed 01 May 2012

  • Iversen V, Chhetry B, Francis P, Gurung M, Kafle G, Pain A, Seeley J (2006) High value forests, hidden economies and elite capture: evidence from forest user groups in Nepal’s Terai. Ecol Econ 58(1):93–107. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.05.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James NDG (1990) A history of English forestry, vol 2. Basil Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe D (2004) The impact of education in rural Ghana: examining household labor allocation and returns on and off the farm. J Dev Econ 73(1):287–314. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2003.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jørgensen I, Vivekanandan K (2003) Private forestry based on Paulownia in Sri Lanka. An appraisal of the outgrower scheme by Paulownia Plantations Ltd. Noragric Report, Ås

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaimowitz D (2005) The international experience with community forestry. In: CIFOR (ed) Towards a shared vision and action frame for community forestry in Liberia. Proceedings of the first international workshop on community forestry in Liberia. CIFOR, Bogor Barat, pp 17–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanel Raj K, Acharya DP (2008) Re-inventing forestry agencies: institutional innovation to support community forestry in Nepal. In: Durst P et al (eds) Re-inventing forestry agencies. Experiences of institutional restructuring in Asia and the Pacific, vol 3. FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, pp 132–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Kien ND (2009) Improvement of Eucalyptus plantations grown for pulp production. Ph.D., Sveringes Lantbruksuniversitet

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey BH, Binswanger HP (1993) Characteristics and performance of resettlement programs: a review. World Dev 21(9):1477–1494. doi:10.1016/0305-750×(93)90128-V

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson AM, Barry D, Dahal GR (2010) New rights for forest-based communities? Understanding processes of forest tenure reform. Int For Rev 12(1):78–96. doi:10.1505/ifor.12.1.78

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Hung Cuong (1988) Zur Organisation der forstlichen Produktion in den Forstwirtschaftsbetrieben der SR Vietnam. Dissertation, Technische Universität Dresden

    Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Li Nana, Liu X (eds) (2004) Transformation and countermeasures on business operation models in uncertain environment. The fourth international conference on electronic business (ICEB2004), Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  • Little PD, Watts M (eds) (1994) Living under contract. Contract farming and agrarian transformation in Sub-Saharan Africa. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Maansson M (2003) A review of principles, criteria and indicators of best practice in outgrower schemes. In: FAO (ed) Towards equitable partnerships between corporative and smallholder partners. Workshop synthesis. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, pp 27–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Macqueen D (2008) Supporting small forest enterprises: a cross-sectoral review of best practice, vol 23, IIED small and medium forestry enterprise series. IIED, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Macqueen D (2012) Enabling conditions for successful community forest enterprises. Small-Scale Forest 1–19. doi: 10.1007/s11842-011-9193-8

  • Marcus T (undated) KwaZulu-Natal provincial synthesis report. Land and Agriculture Policy Centre, Land Reform Research Programme

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayers J, Vermeulen S (2002) Company-community forestry partnerships: from raw deals to mutual gains? An international review with proposals for improving forests, enterprise and livelihoods, Instruments for sustainable private sector forestry series. Earthprint, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayers J, Vermeulen S (2003) Company-community forestry partnerships: from raw deals to mutual gains? In: FAO (ed) Towards equitable partnerships between corporative and smallholder partners. Workshop synthesis. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, pp 133–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Miebach B (2009) Prozesstheorie. Analyse, organisation und system. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften/GWV Fachverlage GmbH Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Mighell RL, Jones LA (1963) Vertical coordination in agriculture. Farm economics division, economic research service, U.S. Dept. of Agriculture, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Mncube D (2010) Sappi’s project grow – presentation by Dinga Mncube. Executive insight. Mark Roux, Deloitte South Africa, Deloitte Eminent Speaker Event

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra H, Gokhale Y (2008) Management regimes, property rights, and forest biodiversity in Nepal and India. Environ Manag 41:719–733. doi:10.1007/s00267-008-9073-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naina HA (2011) Impact of taungya implementation in the collaborative forest management (CBFM) program towards the livelihoods improvement of the forest village community in West Java, Indonesia. Masterarbeit, TU Dresden

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR (1993) An introduction to agroforestry. Kluwer Academic Publishers in cooperation with International Centre for Research in Agroforestry, Dordrecht

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Negussie AD (2003) Farm forestry decision-making strategies of the Guraghe households, Southern-Central Highlands of Ethiopia. Dissertation, TU Dresden

    Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen Quang Tan (2011) Chopping for chips. An analysis of wood lows from smallholder plantations in Vietnam. Working paper, vol 65. CIFOR, Bogor

    Google Scholar 

  • Nsiah B (2010) Contribution of smallholder farm forest plantation management to livelihood strategies of farm households in the high forest zone of Ghana. Doctoral, TU Dresden

    Google Scholar 

  • Osei-Tutu P, Nhancale B (2010) Hidden forestry revealed. Characteristics, constraints and opportunities for small and medium forest enterprises in Ghana. International Institute for Environment and Development (IIED), London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action, vol 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Otsuka K, Larson DF (2013) Towards a green revolution in Sub-Saharan Africa. In: Otsuka K, Larson DF (eds) An African green revolution. Finding ways to boost productivity on small farms. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 281–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez MR, Belcher B, Fu M, Yang X (2004) Looking through the bamboo curtain: an analysis of the changing role of forest and farm income in rural livelihoods in China. Int For Rev 6(3–4):306–316. doi:10.1505/ifor.6.3.306.59968

    Google Scholar 

  • Poffenberger M, McGean B (eds) (1996) Village voices, forest choices: joint forest management in India. Oxford University Press, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Pokhare BK, Nurse M (2004) Forests and people’s livelihoods: benefiting the poor from community forestry. http://communityforestry-nscfp.org/files/listingfiles/MicrosoftWord-Propoorframe_DP303mike071103.pdf. Accessed 24 Jan 2012

  • Prasad R, Bhatnagar P (1995) Social forestry experiences over a decade. International Book Distributors, Dehra Dun

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretzsch J (2005) Forest related rural livelihood strategies in national and global development. Forest Trees Livelihood 15:115–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pretzsch J (2010) Forest organisations in change. Examples from the tropics and subtropics. In: Spathelf P (ed) Sustainable forest management in a changing world: a European perspective. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 191–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Race D, Bisjoe AR, Hakim R, Hayati N, Julmansyah N, Kadir A, Kurniawan A, Kusumedi P, Nawir AA, Nurhaedah AA, Perbatasari D, Purwanti R, Rohadi D, Stewart H, Sumirat B, Suwarno A (2009) Partnerships for involving small-scale growers in commercial forestry: lessons from Australia and Indonesia. Int Forest Rev 11(1):88–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regmi BR, Albano A, Kumar C, Sharma GB (2009) Improving the livelihoods of the poor and marginalized in Nepal through leasehold forestry and livestock program: a review of institutional constraints and opportunities. Banko 18(2):10–17. doi:10.3126/banko.v18i2.2168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royo N (2011) Why tenure reform is needed in Asia. ITTO Trop Forest Update 20(4):9–10

    Google Scholar 

  • de Rueda RA (2008) Re-inventing the forestry agencies of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Philippines: a case study. In: Durst P et al (eds) Re-inventing forestry agencies. Experiences of institutional restructuring in Asia and the Pacific, vol 2. FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, Bangkok, pp 79–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Sappi (2006) Project grow report 28 June 2006. http://environment.yale.edu/tfd/uploads/SAPPI_Project_Grow_Report.pdf. Accessed 19 Feb 2012

  • Sappi (2011) Southern Africa sustainability report 2011. http://www.sappi.com/regions/sa/Sustainability/Documents/2011SappiSouthernAfricaSustainabilityReport.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2012

  • Sartorius K, Kirsten J (2007) A framework to facilitate institutional arrangements for smallholder supply in developing countries: an agribusiness perspective. Food Pol 32(5–6):640–655. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2007.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlager E, Ostrom E (1992) Property-rights regimes and natural resources. A conceptual analysis. Land Econ 68(3):249–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schober H (2002) Prozessorganisation. Theoretische Grundlagen und Gestaltungsoptionen. Gabler Edition Wissenschaft. Dt. Univ.-Verl, Wiesbaden

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreckenberg K, Luttrell C, Moss C (2006) Participatory forest management: an overview – background paper. http://www.odi.org.uk/resources/docs/3781.pdf. Accessed 16 Apr 2012

  • Singh VS, Pandey DN, Prakash NP (2011) What determines the success of joint forest management? Science-based lessons on sustainable governance of forests in India. Resour Conserv Recycl 56(1):126–133. doi:10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.09.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith D (2003) Sappi forests: project grow. In: FAO (ed) Towards equitable partnerships between corporative and smallholder partners. Workshop synthesis. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, pp 169–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Stogdill RM (1967) Basic concepts for a theory of organization. Manage Sci 13(10): B-666. doi:10.1287/mnsc.13.10.B666

  • Thoms C, Karna BK, Karmacharya MB (2006) Limitations of leasehold forestry for poverty alleviation in Nepal. Soc Nat Resour 19:951–958. doi:10.1080/08941920600902179

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuan DA (2006) Governance structure and performance. A comparative institutional analysis of community forest management. Dissertation, TU Dresden

    Google Scholar 

  • Turyahabwe N, Banana A (2008) An overview of history and development of forest policy and legislation in Uganda. Int Forest Rev 10(4):641–656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNECE/FAO (2008) Guide to good practice in contract labour. Report of the UNECE/FAO team of specialists on best practices in forest contracting. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Uphoff N (1993) Grassroots organizations and NGOs in rural development: opportunities with diminishing states and expanding markets. World Dev 21(4):607–622. doi:10.1016/0305-750X(93)90113-N

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Laerhoven F (2010) Governing community forests and the challenge of solving two-level collective action dilemmas—a large-N perspective. Governance, complexity and resilience. Glob Environ Chang 20(3):539–546. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.04.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Noorwijk M, Tomich TP (1995) Agroforestry technologies for social forestry. Tree-crop interactions and forestry-farmer conflicts. In: Hartadi SH, Sumardi SS, Iswantoro H (eds) Social forestry and sustainable forest management. Perum Perhutani, Jakarta, pp 168–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen S, Nawir AA, Mayers J (2003) Better livelihoods through partnership? A review of the impacts of deals between communities and forestry companies on local development. Paper presented at the international conference on rural livelihoods, forests and biodiversity, Bonn, 19–23 May 2003

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts M (1994) Life under contract: contract farming, agrarian restructuring, and flexible accumulation. In: Little PD, Watts M (eds) Living under contract. Contract farming and agrarian transformation in Sub-Saharan Africa. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, pp 21–77

    Google Scholar 

  • White A, Martin A (2002) Who owns the world's forests? Forest tenure and public forests in transition. Forest Trends, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersum KF (1999) Social forestry. Changing perspectives in forestry science or practice? Ph.D. thesis, Wageningen Agricultural University, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiersum KF (2010) Community forestry between local autonomy and global encapsulation. http://www.forestrynepal.org/images/02-PresentedPapersandPowerpoints/Papers/05-FreerkWiersumPaper.pdf. Accessed 11 Apr 2012

  • World Bank (1978) Forestry. Sector policy paper. http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/1978/02/440307/forestry. Accessed 07 July 2012

  • Xayvongsa L (2001) Beurteilung bäuerlichen Teakanbaus mittels Betriebssystemanalyse in Luang Prabang, Laos. Assessment of Teak related Farming Systems in Luang Prabang, Laos. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden

    Google Scholar 

  • Zitzmann G (1998) Multiple use and livelihood strategies in mopane woodland. The case of Ditladi, North-East District, Botswana. M.Sc. thesis, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden

    Google Scholar 

  • Zivnuska J (1966) The integration of forest development plans and national development plans. How to make the forestry case at the national level. Proceedings of the 6th world forest congress, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of International Forestry and Forest Products, Technische Universität Dresden, 1117, Tharandt, 01735, Germany

    Eckhard Auch, Jürgen Pretzsch & Holm Uibrig

Authors
  1. Eckhard Auch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jürgen Pretzsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Holm Uibrig
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Eckhard Auch or Jürgen Pretzsch .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of International Forestry and Forest Products, TU Dresden, Tharandt, Germany

    Jürgen Pretzsch

  2. Faculty of Life Sciences, Hochschule Rhein-Waal, Kleve, Germany

    Dietrich Darr

  3. Institute of International Forestry and Forest Products, TU Dresden, Tharandt, Germany

    Holm Uibrig

  4. Institute of International Forestry and Forest Products, TU Dresden, Tharandt, Germany

    Eckhard Auch

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Auch, E., Pretzsch, J., Uibrig, H. (2014). Organizational Changes in Forest Management. In: Pretzsch, J., Darr, D., Uibrig, H., Auch, E. (eds) Forests and Rural Development. Tropical Forestry, vol 9. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41404-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation