Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8206))

Abstract

Tasks and difficulties inherent in the largely open problem of temporal information extraction from legal text are outlined. We demonstrate the efficacy of tools and concepts available “off-the-shelf” and suggest refinements for such applications. In particular, the frequent references between regulatory texts have to be addressed as a separate named entity recognition task that bears relevance to an analysis of the temporal ordering of legislation. A regular expression-based approach as a robust first step towards addressing this problem is tested.

We gratefully acknowledge Enterprise Ireland’s Governance Risk and Compliance Technology Centre Initial Grant CC-2011-2601-B.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Mylopoulos, J., Borgida, A., Jarke, M., Koubarakis, M.: Telos: Representing knowledge about information systems. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 8(4), 325–362 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Dardenne, A., Van Lamsweerde, A., Fickas, S.: Goal-directed requirements acquisition. Science of Computer Programming 20(1), 3–50 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Fuxman, A., Liu, L., Mylopoulos, J., Pistore, M., Roveri, M., Traverso, P.: Specifying and analyzing early requirements in Tropos. Requirements Engineering 9(2), 132–150 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. COMPAS-Project: Deliverable D2.2: Initial specification of compliance language constructs and operators, Version 2.0 (2009), www.compas-ict.eu/compas_results/deliverables/m11/D2.2_Initial-specification-of-compliance-language-constructs-and-operators.pdf (last accessed July 20, 2013)

  5. Breaux, T.D., Gordon, D.G.: Regulatory Requirements Traceability and Analysis Using Semi-formal Specifications. In: Doerr, J., Opdahl, A.L. (eds.) REFSQ 2013. LNCS, vol. 7830, pp. 141–157. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Jurafsky, D., Martin, J.H.: Speech and Language Processing, 2nd edn. Prentice Hall Series in Artificial Intelligence. Pearson Education International, New Jersey (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dozier, C., Kondadadi, R., Light, M., Vachher, A., Veeramachaneni, S., Wudali, R.: Named Entity Recognition and Resolution in Legal Text. In: Francesconi, E., Montemagni, S., Peters, W., Tiscornia, D. (eds.) Semantic Processing of Legal Texts. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6036, pp. 27–43. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Quaresma, P., Gonçalves, T.: Using linguistic information and machine learning techniques to identify entities from juridical documents. In: Francesconi, E., Montemagni, S., Peters, W., Tiscornia, D. (eds.) Semantic Processing of Legal Texts. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6036, pp. 44–59. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Baldwin, T., Beavers, J., Bender, E., Flickinger, D., Kim, A., Oepen, S.: Beauty and the Beast: What Running a Broad-Coverage Precision Grammar over the BNC Taught Us about the Grammar – and the Corpus. In: Kepsar, S., Reis, M. (eds.) Linguistic Evidence: Empirical, Theoretical and Computational Perspectives. Studies in Generative Grammar, vol. 85, pp. 49–69. Mouton De Gruyter (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. HM Revenue & Customs: Anti-money laundering guidance for money service businesses, We used paragraphs 10.5.6 and 10.6.1 for the analysis described in this paper (2010), www.hmrc.gov.uk/mlr/mlr_msb.pdf (last accessed July 20, 2013)

  11. Pustejovsky, J., Castano, J., Ingria, R., Sauri, R., Gaizauskas, R., Setzer, A., Katz, G.: TimeML: Robust Specification of Event and Temporal Expressions in Text. In: Fifth International Workshop on Computational Semantics (IWCS-5) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Verhagen, M., Mani, I., Sauri, R., Knippen, R., Jang, S.B., Littman, J., Rumshisky, A., Phillips, J., Pustejovsky, J.: Automating Temporal Annotation with TARSQI. Demo Session. In: Proceedings of the ACL (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Llorens, H., Saquete, E., Navarro, B.: Tipsem (English and Spanish): Evaluating CRFs and Semantic Roles in TempEval-2. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation. Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 284–291 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carlson, G., Pelletier, F.: The Generic Book. University of Chicago Press (1995)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Isemann, D., Ahmad, K., Fernando, T., Vogel, C. (2013). Temporal Dependence in Legal Documents. In: Yin, H., et al. Intelligent Data Engineering and Automated Learning – IDEAL 2013. IDEAL 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8206. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41278-3_60

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41278-3_60

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41277-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41278-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics