Advertisement

A Framework for Developing Manufacturing Service Capability Information Model

  • Yunsu Lee
  • Yun Peng
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 414)

Abstract

Rapid formation and optimization of manufacturing production networks (MPN) requires manufacturing service capability (MSC) information of each party be accessible, understandable, and processible by all others in the network. However, at the present time, MSC information is typically encoded according to local proprietary models, and thus is not interoperable. Related existing works are primarily for integration in “isolated automation” of pair-wise or small size networks and thus are not adequate to deal with the high degree of diversity, dynamics, and scales typical for a MPN. In this paper, we propose a model development framework which enables to evolve a reference model for MSC information based on the inputs from proprietary models. The developed reference model can serve as a unified semantic basis supporting interoperability of MSC information across these local proprietary models. Methodology for resolving structural and other semantic conflicts between deferent models in model development is also presented.

Keywords

manufacturing service capability ontology development patternbased ontology transformation canonicalization 

References

  1. 1.
    W3C Semantic Web Activity, http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/
  2. 2.
    Kalfogloul, Y., Schorlemmer, M.: Ontology Mapping: The State of The Art. The Knowledge Engineering Review (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kim, J.: A Semantic Analysis of XML Schema Matching for B2B Systems Integration. PhD dissertation, Department of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, University of Maryland, Baltimore County (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Natalya, F.N., Michel, K.: Ontology Evolution: Not the same as Schema Evolution. Knowledge and Information Systems 6(4), 428–440 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Šváb-Zamazal, O., Svátek, V., Scharffe, F., David, J.: Detection and Transformation of Ontology Patterns. In: Fred, A., Dietz, J.L.G., Liu, K., Filipe, J. (eds.) IC3K 2009. CCIS, vol. 128, pp. 210–223. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Svab-Zamazal, O., Svatek, V.: OWL Matching Patterns Backed by Naming and Ontology Patterns. In: Znalosti (ed.) 10th Czecho-Slovak Knowledge Technology Conference, StaraLesna, Slovakia (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pavel, S., Jérôme, E.: Ontology matching: State of the art and future challenges. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engneering X(X), 1–20 (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gangemi, A.: Ontology Design Patterns for Semantic Web Content. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 262–276. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Presutti, V., et al.: NeOn Project Delivery - D2.5.1. A Library of Ontology Design Patterns: reusable solutions for collaborative design of networked ontologies, http://www.neon-project.org/web-content/images/Publications/neon_2008_d2.5.1.pdf
  10. 10.
    Jones, D., Bench-Capon, T., Visser, P.: Methodologies for Ontology Development. In: Proc. of the IT&KNOWS Conference of the 15th IFIP World Computer Congress (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Staab, S., Schnurr, H.P., Studer, R., Sure, Y.: Knowledge Processes and Ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(1), 26–34 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Noy, N.F., Klein, M.: Ontology evolution: Not the same as schema evolution. Smi 2002-0926, University of Stanford, Stanford Medical Informatics, USA (2002)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Flouris, G., Manakanatas, D., Kondylakis, H., Plexousakis, D., Antoniou, G.: Ontology change: classification and survey. The Knowledge Engineering Review Journal 23(2), 117–152 (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bizer, C.: D2R MAP: A Database to RDF Mapping Language. In: Proceedings of the 12th International World Wide Web Conference, Budapest, Hungary (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bizer, C., Seaborne, A.: D2RQ–treating non-RDF databases as virtual RDF graphs. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) Proceedings of 3rd International Semantic Web Conference, Hiroshima, Japan. LNCS, vol. 3298. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yunsu Lee
    • 1
  • Yun Peng
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Electrical EngineeringUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore CountyBaltimoreUSA

Personalised recommendations