Skip to main content

Attacking the Critical Parts in Product Development

Marin Platform - Building Flexible Structural Elements for Boats

  • Conference paper

Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT,volume 414)

Abstract

The product cycle is changing, where time legs are shorter, high volume- and cash cow-phases fading. Rapid product introduction and customization are keywords, and often associated with modularization. The objective is to create a flexible product design, not requiring changes in the overall product design every time a new variant is introduced. This has been a feasible strategy for manufacturers of small boats in high-cost countries where an incremental development process is well suited for modularization. However, also more radical innovations are needed, not only change modules and product configurations but also have to develop new product platforms. We then have to deal with the critical, resource demanding processes. This conceptual paper describes how boat builders take modularization to a higher lever by attacking the critical parts in product development, i.e. the structural elements of boats.

Keywords

  • Innovation
  • modularization
  • product development
  • leisureboat

References

  1. O’Sullivan, D., Rolstadås, A., Filos, E.: Global education in manufacturing strategy. Journal of Intelligent manufacturing 22(5), 663–674 (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  2. Davis, S.: Future Perfect. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Du, X., Tseng, M.M.: Characterizing CustomerValue for Product Customization. In: Proceedings of the 1999 ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, Las Vegas (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ulrich, K.T., Eppinger, S.D.: Product Design and Development. McGraw-Hill, New York (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Duray, R., Ward, P.T., Milligan, G.W., Berry, W.L.: Approaches to mass customization: configurations and empirical validation. Journal of Operations Management 18, 605–625 (2000)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D.C., Nelson, R.R.: The Oxford handbook of innovation. University Press, London (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Christensen, C.M.: The innovator’s dilemma. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eagar, R., van Oene, F., Boulton, C., Roos, D., and Dekeyser, C.: The future of innovation management: The next 10 years. Prism 1. Arthur D. Little (2011), http://www.adlittle.com/prism-articles.html?&no_cache=1&view=379

  9. Hart, S.J.: New product development. In: Baker, J.M., Hart, S.J. (eds.) The Marketing Book, 6th edn. Elsevier, UK (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ericsson, A., Erixon, G.: Controlling Design Variants: Modular Product Platforms. ASME Press, NY (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Duray, R.: Mass Customizers use of inventory, planning techniques and channel management. Production Planning & Control 15(4), 412–421 (2004)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Ericsson, A., Erixon, G.: Controlling Design Variants: Modular Product Platforms. ASME Press, NY (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sanchez, R.: Using modularity to manage the interactions of technical and industrial design. Design Management Journal 2, 8 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stone, R.B.: A heuristic method for identifying modules for product architectures. A heuristic method for identifying modules for product architectures. Design Studies 21, 5–31 (2000)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  15. Jo, H.H., Parsaei, H.R., Sullivan, W.G.: Principles of concurrent engineering. In: Concurrent Engineering: Contemporary Issues and Modern Design Tools, pp. 3–23. Chapman and Hall, New York (1993)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  16. Dahmus, J.B., Gonzales-Zugasti, J.P., Otto, K.N.: Modular product architecture. Design Studies 22(5), 409–425 (2001)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  17. Sanchez, R., Mahoney, J.T.: Modularity, Flexibility, and Knowledge Management in Product and Organization Design. IEEE Engineering Management Review. Reprint from Strategic Management 17 (1996); special issue December. John Wiley & Sons Limited

    Google Scholar 

  18. Henriksen, B., Røstad, C.C.: Evaluating and Prioritizing Projects – Setting Targets. The Business Effect Evaluation Methodology BEEM. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 3(2), 275–291 (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing

About this paper

Cite this paper

Henriksen, B., Røstad, C.C. (2013). Attacking the Critical Parts in Product Development. In: Prabhu, V., Taisch, M., Kiritsis, D. (eds) Advances in Production Management Systems. Sustainable Production and Service Supply Chains. APMS 2013. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 414. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41266-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41266-0_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41265-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41266-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)