Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Praxis der Dialyse pp 183–224Cite as

Peritonealdialyse (PD)

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Zusammenfassung

Die PD stellt heute einerseits ein Konkurrenzverfahren zur Hämodialyse (HD) dar, andererseits wird sie auch als „Einstiegsverfahren“ bei noch relativ guter Nierenrestfunktion propagiert. Ihr Anteil an den Nierenersatzverfahren weist weltweit große regionale Unterschiede auf. Ihr Anteil ging in den USA von 18% in 1994 auf ca. 8% in 2005 zurück (United States Renal Data System, USRDS 2005). In Deutschland ist der Anteil der PD-Patienten seit Jahren unterdurchschnittlich gering, mit ebenfalls rückläufiger Tendenz (1996 ca. 7,3%, 2005 ca. 4,9%; Quelle: Quasi-Niere Bericht 2005).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Anonymous (1997) NKF-DOQI Clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal dialysis adequacy. National Kidney Foundation-Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative. Am J Kidney Dis 30 (Suppl 2): S67–S136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baragetti I, Alberghini E, Scanziani R et al (2009 )The APD treatment with a cycler personalised breakpoint improves peritoneal dialytic Kt/V:

    Google Scholar 

  • a pilot study. Poster Presentation at World Congress of Nephrology, Milan 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergström J, Heimbürger O, Lindholm B (1998) Calculation of the protein equivalent of total nitrogen appearance from urea appearance. Which formulas should be used? Perit Dial Int 18: 467–473

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blake P, Burkart JM, Churchill DN et al. (1996) Recommended clinical practices for maximizing peritoneal dialysis clearances. Perit Dial Int. Sep–Oct;16(5):448–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Boen ST (1961) Kinetics of peritoneal dialysis. Medicine 40:243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill DN et al., for CANUSA-study investigators (1996) Adequacy of dialysis and nutrition in continuous peritoneal dialysis: association with clinical outcomes. Canada-USA (CANUSA) Peritoneal Dialysis Study group. J Am Soc Nephrol. Feb;7(2):198–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocchi R, Degli Esposti E, Fabbri A et al. (1999) Prevalence of hypertension in patients on peritoneal dialysis: results of an Italian multicentre study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. Jun;14(6):1536–1540

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Demoulin N, Goffin E (2009) Intrapertioneal urokinase and oral rifampicin for persisting asymptomatic dialysate infection following acute coagulase-negative staphylococcus peritonitis.Perit. Dial. Int. 29(5): 548–553

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Vecchi AF, Colucci P, Salerno F, Scalamogna A, Ponticelli C (2002) Outcome of peritoneal dialysis in cirrhotic patients with chronic renal failure Am J Kidney Dis. Jul;40(1):161–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz-Buxo JA, Farmer CD, Walker PJ et al. (1981) Continuous cyclic peritoneal dialysis- a preliminary report. Artif Organs 5: 157–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Di Paolo N, Capotondo L, Sansoni E, Romolini V, Simola M, Gaggiotti E, et al. The self-locating catheter: clinical experience and follow-up. Perit Dial Int 2004;24 :359–69

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dombros N, Dratwa M, Feriani M et al.; EBPG Expert Group on Peritoneal Dialysis (2005) European Best Practice Guidelines on Peritoneal Dialysis 2005. Nephrol Dial Transplant. Dec;20 Suppl 9

    Google Scholar 

  • Durand PY, Tam P et al. (2005) Optimization and personalization of APD based on the individual drain flow profile (BREAKpoint-APD), Ontario

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarborough Hospital. Oral presentation at Euro PD, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Enia G, Sicuso C, Alati G, Zoccali C (1993) Subjective global assessment of nutrition in dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 8: 1094–1098

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Figueireko A, Goh B-L, Jenkins S, et al. (2010) Clinical practice guidelines for peritoneal access. Perit Dial Int 30: 424–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gokal et al. (2002) Metabolic and laboratory effects of icodextrin. Kidney Int 62 (Suppl 81):S62–S71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haag-Weber M, Krämer R, Haake R et al. (2010) Low-GDP fluid (Gambrosol trio) attenuates decline of residual renal function in PD patients: a prospective randomized study. Nephrol Dial Transplant 25(7):2288–96.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Khalifeh N, Vychytil A, Hörl WH (2006) Peritonealdialyse bei therapieresistenter Herzinsuffizienz. Nephro-News, Dezember 7–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Keshaviah P, Nolph KD, Moore HL et al. (1994) Lean body mass estimation by creatinine kinetics. J Am Soc Nephrol 4: 1475–1485

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Konings CJ, Kooman JP, Schonck M et al. (2003) Fluid status in CAPD patients is related to peritoneal transport and residual renal function: evidence from a longitudinal study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. Apr;18(4):797–803

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • La Milia et al. (2002) The mini peritoneal equilibration test (mini-PET). Nephrol Dial Transplant 17(Suppl 3):17–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang SM, Bergner A, Töpfer M, Schiffl H (2001) Preservation of residual renal function in dialysis patients: effects of dialysis-technique-related factors. Perit Dial Int. Jan–Feb;21(1):52–57

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Li P K-T, Szeto CC, Piraino B, Bernardini J et al. (2010) ISPD Guideline/Recommendations: Peritoneal dialysis-related Infections recommendations: 2010 Update. Perit Dial Int 30: 393 -432.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moist LM, Port FK et al. (2000) Predictors of loss of residual renal function among new dialysis patients.J Am Soc Nephrol. Mar;11(3):556–564

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Menon MK, Naimark DM, Bargman JM, Vas SI, Oreopoulos DG (2001) Long-term blood pressure control in a cohort of peritoneal dialysis patients and its association with residual renal function. Nephrol Dial Transplant. Nov;16(11):2207–2213

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Misra M, Vonesh E, Van Stone JC, Moore HL, Prowant B, Nolph KD (2001) Effect of cause and time of dropout on the residual GFR: a comparative analysis of the decline of GFR on dialysis. Kidney Int. Feb;59(2):754–763

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moritz ML, del Rio M, Crooke GA, Singer LP (2001) Acute peritoneal dialysis as bothe cause and treatment of hypernatremia in an infant. Pediatr Nephrol. Sep;16(9):697–700

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nowack R, Birck R, Weinreich T (2009) Dialyse und Nephrologie für Fachpersonal. 3. Auflage, Springer Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oreopoulos DG, Robson M, Izatt S et al. (1978) A simple and safe technique for continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 24: 484–489

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pandya BK, Friede T, Williams JD (2004) A comparison of peritonitis in polycystic and non-polycystic patients on peritoneal dialysis. Perit Dial Int. Jan-Feb;24(1):79–81

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paniagua R, Amato D, Vonesh E et al.; Mexican Nephrology Collaborative Study Group (2002) Effects of increased peritoneal clearances on mortality rates in peritoneal dialysis: ADEMEX, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Am Soc Nephrol. May;13(5):1307–1320

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Piraino B et al.; for ISPD ad hoc advisory committee (2005) Peritoneal dialysis-related infections recommendations: 2005 update.Perit Dial Int. Mar–Apr;25(2):107–131

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Popovich RP, Moncrief JW, Decherd JF et al. (1976) The definition of a novel portable-wearable equilibrium peritoneal technique (Abstract). Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 22: 64

    Google Scholar 

  • Rippe B (1993) The three-pore model of peritoneal transport. Perit Dial Int 13:535

    Google Scholar 

  • Rippe B, Zakaria ER (1992) Lymphatic versus nonlymphatic fluid adsorption from the peritoneal cavity as related to the peritoneal ultrafiltration capacity and sieving properties. Blood Purif 10: 189–202

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rippe B, Venturoli D, Simonsen O, de Arteaga J (2004) Fluid and electrolyte transport across the peritoneal membrane during CAPD according to the three-pore model. Perit Dial Int. Jan–Feb;24(1):10–27

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer F, Klaus G, Mueller-Wiefel DE, Mehls O (1999) Intermittent versus continuous intraperitoneal glycopeptide/ceftazidime treatment in children with peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis. The Mid-European Pediatric Peritoneal Dialysis Study Group (MEPPS). J Am Soc Nephrol 10(1): 136–145

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwenger V (2007) PD-assoziierte Peritonitis. Nephrologe 2: 107–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stack AG, Molony DA, Rahman NS, Dosekun A, Murthy B (2003) Impact of dialysis modality on survival of new ESRD patients with congestive heart failure in the United States Kidney Int. Sep;64(3):1071–1079

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenckhoff H, Schechter H (1968) A bacteriologically safe peritoneal access device. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 14: 181–187

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Termorshuizen F, Dekker FW, van Manen JG, Korevaar JC, Boeschoten EW, Krediet RT; NECOSAD Study Group (2004) Relative contribution of residual renal function and different measures of adequacy to survival in hemodialyis patients: an analysis of the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis (NECOSAD)-2.J Am Soc Nephrol. Apr;15(4):1061–1070

    Google Scholar 

  • Twardowski ZJ (1990) PET – a simpler approach for determining prescriptions for adequate dialysis therapy. Adv Perit Dial. 6:186–191

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Biesen W, Vanholder RC, Veys N, Dhondt A, Lameire NH (2000) An evaluation of an integrative care approach for end-stage renal disease patients. J Am Soc Nephrol Jan;11(1):116–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Vychytil A (2007) Peritonealdialyse bei Patienten mit Diabetes. Diabetes, Stoffwechsel und Herz 1: 23–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Wens et al. (1998) A previously undescribed side effect of icodextrin: overestimation of glycemia by glucose analyzer. Perit Dial Int 18:603–609

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Williams JD, Topley N, Craig KJ, Mackenzie RK, Pischetsrieder M, Lage C, Passlick-Deetjen J; Euro Balance Trial Group (2004) The Euro-Balance Trial: the effect of a new biocompatible peritoneal dialysis fluid (balance) on the peritoneal membrane. Kidney Int. Jul;66(1):408–418

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dialysezentrum Wieblingen, Praxis für Nieren- und Hochdruckerkrankungen, Heidelberg, Deutschland

    Dr. med. Steffen Geberth

  2. Dialysezentrum Lindau, Praxis für Nieren- und Hochdruckkrankheiten, Lindau, Deutschland

    Dr. med. Rainer Nowack

Authors
  1. Dr. med. Steffen Geberth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Dr. med. Rainer Nowack
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steffen Geberth .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Geberth, S., Nowack, R. (2014). Peritonealdialyse (PD). In: Praxis der Dialyse. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41208-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41208-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41207-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41208-0

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation