Geo-analysis of Landscape Level Degradation and Natural Risk Formation under Uncertainty

A Case Study of Selected Czech Urban Watercourses
  • Radka Báčová
  • Petr Kubíček
  • Jiří Jakubínský
  • Eva Svobodová
  • Vladimír Herber
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 413)


Rivers and streams in urban areas are losing their natural environ-mental qualities. A lack of river management and insufficient interest on the part of municipal authorities has become the norm, especially in the case of small watercourses. Here, an interdisciplinary approach to landscape-level degradation is applied to selected catchments in the Czech Republic (the streams known as the Lačnovský and the Leskava). This approach includes basic geographical approaches to the quantification of the relationship between anthropogenic pressure and ecological stability. The methods employed include hy-dromorphological field research, identification of changes in land use, and an inventory of anthropogenic landforms.

The existence of urban stream syndrome was established in model catchments. Parameters for these areas were compared with values for susceptibility to natural risk and preliminary results show a spatial pattern consistent with the areas at most risk also being prone to flooding. The observations were subjected to cartographic visualization and enriched with thematic and temporal uncertainty features, thus refining the results and highlighting any ambiguity.


degradation of landscape cartographic visualization uncertainty natural risk river landscape the Leskava stream the Lačnovský stream 


  1. 1.
    Demek, J., Embleton, C. (eds.): Guide to Medium – Scale Geomor-phological Mapping. IGU Commission on Geomorphological Survey and Mapping. Brno (1978)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Dvorsky, J., Snasel, V., Vozenilek, V.: Map Similarity Testing Using Matrix Decomposition. In: Badr, Y.K., Caballe, S., Xhafa, F., Abraham, A., Gros, B. (eds.) International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems, pp. 290–295 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Edwards, L.D., Nelson, E.S.: Visualizing data certainty: A case study using graduated circles maps. Cartographic Perspectives 38, 19–36 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Feiden, K., Kruse, F., Řezník, T., Kubíček, P., Schentz, H., Eberhardt, E., Baritz, R.: Best Practice Network GS SOIL Promoting Access to European, Interoperable and INSPIRE Compliant Soil Information. In: Hřebíček, J., Schimak, G., Denzer, R. (eds.) ISESS 2011. IFIP AICT, vol. 359, pp. 226–234. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Goodchild, M.: Visualizing fizzy map. In: Hearnshaw, H. (ed.) Visualization in Geo-Graphical Information Systems, pp. 158–167. John Willey & Sons, London (1994)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gurnell, A., et al.: Urban rivers: Hydrology, geomorphology, ecology and opportunities for change. Geography Compass 1(5), 1118–1137 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Jakubínský, J.: The influence of watercourses regulations on runoff processes and the development of floods (a case study of the Košátecký stream), Diploma Thesis (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jakubínský, J., Báčová, R.: Environmental Values: the Dunajovický and the Košátecký Stream Catchments, Czech Republic. Journal of Maps 9(3), 9 p. (2013), doi:10.1080/17445647.2013.829409Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kubíček, P., Šašinka, Č.: Thematic Uncertainty Visualization Usability – Comparison of Basic Methods. Annals of GIS 17, 20 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leitner, M., Buttenfield, B.P.: Guidelines for the display of attribute uncertainty. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 27, 3–14 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    MacEachren, A., et al.: Visualizing uncertain information. Cartographic Perspectives 13(3), 10–19 (1992)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    MacEachren, A., et al.: Visualising geospatial information uncertainty. What we know and what we need to know. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 32, 139–160 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pang, A., et al.: Visualizing uncertainty in geo-spatial data. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on the Intersections between Geospatial Information and Information Technology, pp. 1–14. National Academies Committee of the Computer Science and Tele-communications Board, Washington, D. C (1997)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pechanec, V., Janíková, V., Brus, J., Kiliánová, H.: Typological data in the process of landscape potential identification with using GIS. Moravian Geographical Reports 17, 12–24 (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shi, W.: Principles of modelling uncertainties in spatial data and spatial analyses. Taylor and Francis, London (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Staněk, K., Friedmannová, L., Kubíček, P., Konečný, M.: Selected issues of cartographic communication optimization for emergency centers. International Journal of Digital Earth 3, 316–339 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tockner, K., Bunn, S.E., Gordon, C., Naiman, R.J., Quinn, G.P., Stanford, J.: Flood plains: critically threatened ecosystems. In: Polunin, N. (ed.) Aquatic systems, trends and global prospects, pp. 45–61. Cambridge University Press (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tucek, P., Paszto, V., Vozenilek, V.: Regular use of entropy for studying dissimilar geographical phenomena. Geografie-Sbornik CGS 114, 117–129 (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Walsh, C.H.J., et al.: The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 24, 706–723 (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhang, J., Goodchild, M.: Uncertainty in Geographical Information. Taylor and Francis, London (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Radka Báčová
    • 1
  • Petr Kubíček
    • 1
  • Jiří Jakubínský
    • 1
  • Eva Svobodová
    • 1
  • Vladimír Herber
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Geography, Faculty of ScienceMasaryk UniversityBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations