Investigating the Role of Composition Conventions in Three-Move Mate Problems

  • Azlan Iqbal
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8215)


In improving the quality of their chess problems or compositions for tournaments and possibly publication in magazines, composers usually rely on ‘good practice’ rules which are known as ‘conventions’. These might include, contain no unnecessary moves to illustrate a theme and avoid castling moves because it cannot be proved legal. Often, conventions are thought to increase the perceived beauty or aesthetics of a problem. We used a computer program that incorporated a previously validated computational aesthetics model to analyze three sets of compositions and one set of comparable three-move sequences taken from actual games. Each of these varied in terms of their typical adherence to conventions. We found evidence that adherence to conventions, in principle, contributes to aesthetics in chess problems – as perceived by the majority of players and composers with sufficient domain knowledge – but only to a limited degree. Furthermore, it is likely that not all conventions contribute equally to beauty and some might even have an inverse effect. These findings suggest two main things. First, composers need not concern themselves too much with conventions if their intention is simply to make their compositions appear more beautiful to most solvers and observers. Second, should they decide to adhere to conventions, they should be highly selective of the ones that appeal to their target audience, i.e. those with esoteric knowledge of the domain or ‘outsiders’ who likely understand beauty in chess as something quite different.


Chess problem convention beauty composer 


  1. 1.
    Osborne, H.: Notes on the Aesthetics of Chess and the Concept of Intellectual Beauty. British Journal of Aesthetics 4, 160–163 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Humble, P.N.: Chess as an Art Form. British Journal of Aesthetics 33, 59–66 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Troyer, J.G.: Truth and Beauty: The Aesthetics of Chess Problems. In: Haller (ed.) Aesthetics, Holder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna, pp. 126–130 (1983)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Walls, B.P.: Beautiful Mates: Applying Principles of Beauty to Computer Chess Heuristics., 1st edn. (1997)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Levitt, J., Friedgood, D.: Secrets of Spectacular Chess, 2nd edn. Everyman Chess, London (2008)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Iqbal, M.A.M.: A Discrete Computational Aesthetics Model for a Zero-sum Perfect Information Game. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Computer Science and Information Technology, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (2008),
  7. 7.
    Albrecht, H.: How Should the Role of a (Chess) Tourney Judge Be Interpreted? The Problemist, 217–218 (July 1993); Originally published as Über Die Auffassung Des Richteramtes in Problemturnieren, Problem, 107–109 (January 1959)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Iqbal, A., van der Heijden, H., Guid, M., Makhmali, A.: Evaluating the Aesthetics of Endgame Studies: A Computational Model of Human Aesthetic Perception. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games: Special Issue on Computational Aesthetics in Games 4(3), 178–191 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Velimirovic, M., Valtonen, K.: Encyclopedia of Chess Problems. Chess Informant, Serbia (2012) ISBN 978-86-7297-064-7Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Iqbal, A.: Increasing Efficiency and Quality in the Automatic Composition of Three-move Mate Problems. In: Anacleto, J.C., Fels, S., Graham, N., Kapralos, B., Saif El-Nasr, M., Stanley, K. (eds.) ICEC 2011. LNCS, vol. 6972, pp. 186–197. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fougiaxis, H., Harkola, H.: World Federation for Chess Composition. FIDE Albums (June 2013),
  12. 12.
    Iqbal, A., Rashid, A.: Intended Multiple Interpretations. In: Proceedings of the 4th Malaysian International Conference on Academic Strategies in English Language Teaching, Shah Alam, Malaysia, November 27-28, pp. 97–101 (2012),
  13. 13.
    Myers, D.: What Chess Games and Chess Problems Tell Us About Digital Games and Art. Digital Creativity 23(3-4), 260–271 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Azlan Iqbal
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Information TechnologyUniversiti Tenaga NasionalKajangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations