Exploring Opponent Formats

Game Mechanics for Computer-Supported Physical Games
  • Mads Møller Jensen
  • Majken Kirkegaard Rasmussen
  • Kaj Grønbæk
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8215)

Abstract

The recent growth in development and research in computer-supported physical games has sprouted a wide variety of games merging qualities from both computer games and sports. Despite the increasing interest in this type of games, exploration of their specific game mechanics and the understanding of how the opponent format and relationships impact a game are almost absent in current research. Thus, this paper aims to elucidate how the perception of a competition differs, depending on the opponent format, by presenting a game mechanic framework. The paper furthermore presents an interactive football-training platform, as well as games designed to explore the different opponent formats. The games are qualitatively evaluated to illuminate the qualities of and distinctions between different types of opponent formats, proposed by the framework terminology.

Keywords

Sports framework game mechanics exergames competition 

References

  1. 1.
    Björk, S., et al.: Game Design Patterns. in level up. In: Level Up: Digtal Games Research Conference, pp. 4–6 (2003)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Campbell, T., et al.: Game design principles in everyday fitness applications. In: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 249–252. ACM, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Egenfeldt-Nielsen, S., et al.: Understanding Video Games: The Essential Introduction. Routledge (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fogtmann, M.H.: Designing bodily engaging games: learning from sports. In: Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the New Zealand Chapter of the ACM Special Interest Group on Computer-Human Interaction, pp. 89–96. ACM, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fogtmann, M.H.: Designing With The Body in Mind - Kinesthetic Empathy Interaction (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fogtmann, M.H., et al.: Interaction technology for collective and psychomotor training in sports. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Advances in Computer Enter-tainment Technology, pp. 13:1-13:8. ACM, New York (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kiili, K., Merilampi, S.: Developing engaging exergames with simple motion detection. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments, pp. 103–110. ACM, New York (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liljedahl, M., Lindberg, S.: DigiWall - an audio mostly game. In: ICAD, London, UK (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ludvigsen, M., et al.: TacTowers: an interactive training equipment for elite athletes. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, pp. 412–415. ACM, New York (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mueller, F., et al.: Exertion interfaces: sports over a distance for social bonding and fun. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 561–568. ACM, New York (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mueller, F., et al.: Hanging off a bar. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts, pp. 1055–1058. ACM, New York (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mueller, F., et al.: Airhockey over a distance. In: CHI 2006 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1133–1138. ACM, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mueller, F., et al.: Taxonomy of exertion games. In: Proceedings of the 20th Australasian Conference on Computer-Human Interaction: Designing for Habitus and Habitat, pp. 263–266. ACM, New York (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reilly, S. et al.: A General-Purpose Taxonomy of Computer-Augmented Sports Systems. Digital Sport for Performance Enhancement and Competitive Evolution. IGI Global (2009).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Royce, R.: Skultety’s Categories of Competition A Competing Conceptualisation? Sport, Ethics and Philosophy, 1–14 (2012)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sinclair, J., et al.: Considerations for the design of exergames. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques in Australia and Southeast Asia, pp. 289–295. ACM, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Skultety, S.: Categories of Competition. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 5(4), 433–446 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stefani, R.T.: A taxonomy of sports rating systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part A: Systems and Humans 29(1), 116–120 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sugano, Y., et al.: Shootball: the tangible ball sport in ubiquitous computing. In: Proceedings of the 2006 ACM SIGCHI International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology. ACM, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Suits, B.: The Grasshopper: Games, Life and Utopia. Broadview Press (2005)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vossen, D.P.: The Nature and Classification of Games. Avante 10(1), 53–68 (2004)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wulf, V., Moritz, E.F., Henneke, C., Al-Zubaidi, K., Stevens, G.: Computer Supported Collaborative Sports: Creating Social Spaces Filled with Sports Activities. In: Rauterberg, M. (ed.) ICEC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3166, pp. 80–89. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dance Dance Revolution, http://www.ddrgame.com/
  24. 24.
  25. 25.
  26. 26.

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mads Møller Jensen
    • 1
  • Majken Kirkegaard Rasmussen
    • 1
  • Kaj Grønbæk
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceAarhus UniversityDenmark

Personalised recommendations