Skip to main content

Probabilistic Approaches for the Steady-State Analysis of Distribution Systems with Wind Farms

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 3843 Accesses

Part of the book series: Energy Systems ((ENERGY))

Abstract

This chapter deals with probabilistic approaches for the steady-state analysis (probabilistic load flow) of distribution systems with wind farms. The probabilistic analysis is performed taking into account the randomness of both the distribution system loads and the wind energy production. Several approaches are presented to obtain the probability functions of state and dependent variables (e.g., voltage amplitudes and line flows). These approaches are mainly concentrated on wind farm probabilistic models, using one of the classical probabilistic techniques (e.g., Monte Carlo simulation, convolution process, and special distribution functions) to perform the probabilistic load flow. Numerical applications on a 17-bus balanced test distribution system and on an IEEE 34-bus unbalanced test distribution system are presented and discussed, considering the various wind farm models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As a reminder, given a random variable \( X \) with the pdf \( f\left( x \right) \), the moment of order n is defined as \( m_{n} = \int\nolimits_{ - \infty }^{\infty } {x^{n} f\left( x \right)\;dx} \), and the cumulant of order n is defined as \( \kappa_{n} = \left. {\frac{{d^{n} \varPsi \left( t \right)}}{{dt^{n} }}} \right|_{t = 0} \), where \( \varPsi \left( t \right) \) is the cumulant-generating function, i.e., the logarithm of the moment-generating function, if it exists.

  2. 2.

    In the authors’ opinion, the use of a normal pdf instead of the more popular Weibull pdf is justified by the considerations that they are interested to short-term predictions. In any case, they consider that the proposed approach can be extended to medium- and long-term predictions if the uncertainties of wind and loads are properly modelled.

  3. 3.

    As is well known, a stochastic process is defined as a model of a system that develops randomly in time according to probabilistic laws.

  4. 4.

    The use of the discrete Markov process to model wind speed (and then the wind farm) was proposed in the relevant literature both for the probabilistic power flow analysis and for the reliability analysis of distribution networks that have wind farms.

  5. 5.

    We note that not all authors consider the use of time series to be a strictly probabilistic approach. In fact, strictly speaking, unlike the Monte Carlo simulation, the input data are not derived from pdfs, but the time series of load and wind generation are directly applied. In the frame of this method, the steady-sate of the distribution system is simulated during a suitable time period (i.e., 1 week or 1 year). Using the active and reactive power curves of the WTGU (Fig. 1), the output power series can be obtained. From the load and wind generation time series, the corresponding state and dependent variables can be obtained by performing subsequent load flow calculations for each point; this approach was applied also in [9, 10].

  6. 6.

    In addition to the first-order Markov chain model, a second order model has been proposed to generate wind speed time series. For example, see [14].

  7. 7.

    A multi-state system (MSS) is a system that performs its mission with various levels of efficiency, referred as performance rates.

References

  1. Caramia P, Carpinelli G, Proto D, Varilone P Deterministic approaches for steady state analysis in distribution systems with wind farms. In: Pardalos PM, Pereira MVF, Rebennack S, Boyko N (eds) Handbook of wind power systems: operation, modeling, simulation and economic aspects. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jorgensen P, Tande JO (1998) Probabilistic load flow calculation using Monte Carlo Techniques for distribution network with wind turbines. In: 8th international conference on harmonics and quality of power ICHQP’98, Athens (Greece), 14–16 Oct 1998

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hatziargyriou ND, Karakatsanis TS, Papadopoulos M (1993) Probabilistic load flow in distribution systems containing dispersed wind power generation. IEEE Trans Power Syst 8(1):159–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Masters CL, Mutale J, Strbac G, Curcic S, Jenkins N (2000) Statistical evaluation of voltages in distribution systems with embedded wind generation. IEE Proc Generat Transm Distrib 147(4):207–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Di Fazio AR, Russo M (2008) Wind farm modelling for reliability assessment. IET Renew Power Gener 2(4):239–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bracale A, Caramia P, Carpinelli G, Varilone P (2008) A probability method for very short-term steady state analysis of a distribution system with wind farms. Int J Emerg Electr Power Syst 9(5), Article 2

    Google Scholar 

  7. Usaola J (2009) Probabilistic load flow with wind production uncertainty using cumulants and Cornish–Fisher expansion. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 31(9):474–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhaohong BIE, Gan L, Liu L, Xifan W, Xiuli W (2008) Studies on voltage fluctuations in the integration of wind power plants using probabilistic load flow. In: IEEE power and energy society general meeting—conversion and delivery of electrical energy in the 21st century, pp. 1–7, 20–24 July 2008

    Google Scholar 

  9. Boulaxis NG, Papathanassiou SA, Papadopoulos MP (2002) Wind turbine effect on the voltage profile of distribution networks. Renew Energy 25:401–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Boehme T, Wallace AR, Harrison GH (2007) Applying time series to power flow analysis in networks with high wind penetration. IEEE Trans Power Syst 22(3):951–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Carpinelli G, Pagano M, Caramia P, Varilone P (2007) A probabilistic three-phase load flow for unbalanced electrical distribution systems with wind farms. IET Renew Power Gener 1(2):115–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chen P, Chen Z, Bak-Jensen B, Villafafila R (2007) Study of power fluctuation from dispersed generations and loads and ist impact on a distribution network through a probabilistic approach. In: 9th international conference on electrical power quality and utilization, Barcelona (Spain), 9–11 Oct 2007

    Google Scholar 

  13. Feijòo AE, Cidràs J, Dornelas JLG (1999) Wind speed simulation in wind farms for steady-state security assessment of electrical power systems. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 14(4):1582–1588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Papaefthymiou G, Klockl B (2008) MCMC for wind power simulation. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 23(1):234–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Amada JM, Bayod-Rújula ÁA (2007) Wind power variability model: Part I—foundations. In: 11th international conference on electrical power quality and utilization, Barcelona (Spain), 9–11 Oct 2007

    Google Scholar 

  16. Conlon MF, Mumtaz A, Farrell M, Spooner E (2008) Probabilistic techniques for network assessment with significant wind generation. In: 11th international conference on optimization of electrical and electronic equipment (OPTIM 2008), Braşov, Romania, 22–24 May 2008, pp 351–356

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bracale A, Carpinelli G, Proto D, Russo A, Varilone P (2010) New approaches for very short-term steady-state analysis of an electrical distribution system with wind farms. Energies 3(4):650–670. doi:10.3390/en3040650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Pereira VF, Balu NJ (1992) Composite generation/transmission reliability evaluation. Proc IEEE 80(4):470–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Anders GJ (1990) Probability concepts in electric power systems. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Allan RN, Leite da Silva AM, Burchett RC (1981) Evaluation methods and accuracy in probabilistic load flow solutions. IEEE Trans Power Apparatus Syst (PAS) 100(5):2539–2546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Caramia P, Carpinelli G, Di Vito G, Varilone P (2003) Probabilistic techniques for three-phase load flow analysis. In: IEEE/PES power tech conference, Bologna (Italy), June 2003

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang P, Lee T (2004) Probabilistic load flow computation using the method of combined cumulants and Gram–Charlier expansion. IEEE Trans Power Syst 19(1):676–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kendall MG, Stuart A (1958) The advanced theory of statistics, vol 1. Charles Griffin & Co., Ltd., London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cornish EA, Fisher RA (1937) Moments and cumulants in the specification of distributions. Revue de l’Institut International de Statistics 4:307–320

    Google Scholar 

  25. Jaschke SR (2001) The Cornish–Fisher-expansion in the context of delta–gamma normal approximations. Discussion Paper 54, Sonderforschungsbereich 373. Humboldt-Universität, Berlin. http://www.jaschke-net.de/papers/CoFi.pdf

  26. Santabria L, Dillon TS (1986) Stochastic power flow using cumulants and Von Mises functions. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 1(8):47–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hu Z, Wang X (2006) A probabilistic load flow method considering branch outages. IEEE Trans Power Syst 21(2):507–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sanabria LA, Dillon TS (1998) Power system reliability assessment suitable for a deregulated system via the method of cumulants. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 20(3):203–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Caramia P, Carpinelli G, Varilone P (2010) Point estimate schemes for probabilistic three-phase load flow. Electr Power Syst Res 80(2):168–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mortensen NG, Landberg L, Troen I, Petersen EL (1993) Wind atlas analysis and application program (WAsP)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Feijòo AE, Cidràs J (2000) Modeling of wind farms in the load flow analysis. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15(1):110–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Gelman A, Carlin JB, Stern HS, Rubin DB (1995) Bayesian data analysis. Chaoman & Hall, London (UK)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Black TC, Thompson JW (2001) Bayesian data analysis. Computing Sci Eng 03(4):86–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lenk P (2001) Bayesian inference and Markov Chain Monte Carlo. University of Michigan, USA

    Google Scholar 

  35. Congdon P (1993) Applied Bayesian modelling. Queen Mary University of London (UK), Wiley, London

    Google Scholar 

  36. Chib S, Greenberg E (1995) Understanding the metropolis-hastings algorithm. Am Stat 49(4):327–335

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bracale A, Carpinelli G, Caramia P, Russo A, Varilone P (2010) Point estimate schemes for probabilistic load flow analysis of unbalanced electrical distribution systems with wind farms. IEEE/PES 14th international conference on harmonics and quality of power (ICHQP), 26–29 Sept 2010, Bergamo (Italy)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kersting WH (2001) Radial distribution test feeders. In: IEEE power engineering society winter meeting, vol 2, 28 Jan–1 Feb 2001, pp 908–912. http://ewh.ieee.org/soc/pes/dsacom/testfeeders.html)

  39. Fukunaga L (1972) Introduction to statistical pattern recognition. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Carpinelli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix A.1

1.1 Simulation of Gaussian Correlated Random Variables

In order to generate an approximate n-vector R of Gaussian random variables characterized by the mean value μ(R) and by the covariance matrix cov(R), the following procedure was applied [39]:

  1. 1.

    Evaluate the eigenvalues l 1 , …, l n and the corresponding eigenvectors Ψ 1, …, Ψ n of the matrix cov(R);

  2. 2.

    Generate an n-vector Γ of uncorrelated Gaussian variables characterized by zero mean values and variances equal to l 1 , …, l n ;

  3. 3.

    Generate the vector R as:

$$ {\varvec{R}} = \mu \left( {\varvec{R}}\right) + [\varvec{\varPsi}_1, \ldots,\varvec{\varPsi}_n]\varvec{\varGamma}.$$
(33)

1.2 Simulation of Rayleigh Correlated Random Variables

In order to generate random numbers of N V random variables \( \omega_{1} , \ldots ,\omega_{{N_{V} }} \), which are Rayleigh distributed and correlated, the following approximate procedure can be applied [13]:

  1. 1.

    With \( \mu_{{_{1} }}, \ldots, \mu_{{N_{V} }}^{{}} \) as the mean values, \( \sigma_{1} , \ldots ,\sigma_{{N_{V} }} \) as the standard deviations, and \( \rho_{ij} \) (\( i,\,j = 1, \ldots ,N_{V} \), \( i \ne j \)) as the correlation factors, the covariance matrix can be built as:

$$ {\varvec{\varOmega }}_{\omega } = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\sigma_{{_{1} }}^{2} } & \cdots & {\rho_{{1N_{V} }}^{{}} } \\ {} & \ddots & {} \\ {\rho_{{N_{V} 1}}^{{}} } & \cdots & {\sigma_{{N_{V} }}^{2} } \\ \end{array} } \right], $$
(34)

and a lower triangular matrix L can be determined so that :

$$ \varvec{\varOmega}_{\omega } = {\mathbf{L}}\;{\mathbf{L}}^{T} $$
(35)
  1. 2.

    For each random variable \( \omega_{i} \), a vector of random numbers \( {\varvec{\upomega}}{}_{i\,}^{*} \), distributed according to a Rayleigh pdf with a mean value of \( \mu_{i} \), is generated;

  2. 3.

    Starting from \( \upomega{}_{i\,}^{*} \), a new variable is determined according to the following relationship:

$$ {\mathbf{z}}_{i}^{*} = \frac{{{\varvec{\upomega}}_{i}^{*} - E\left( {{\varvec{\upomega}}_{i}^{*} } \right)}}{{\sigma \left( {{\varvec{\upomega}}_{i}^{*} } \right)}} $$
(36)
  1. 4.

    The random numbers \( {\mathbf{r}}{}_{{\text{i}\,}}^{*} \) of correlated Rayleigh variables can be determined as:

$$ {\mathbf{r}}{}_{i\,}^{*} = \left| {{\mathbf{L}}\left( {{\mathbf{z}}{}_{i\,}^{*} } \right)^{T} + \mu_{i} } \right|. $$
(37)

Appendix A.2

The 17-bus balanced test distribution system and the IEEE 34-bus unbalanced test distribution system are shown in Figs. 29 and 30.

Fig. 29
figure 29

17-bus balanced, 3-phase, test-distribution system

Fig. 30
figure 30

IEEE 34-bus test-distribution system

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bracale, A., Carpinelli, G., Di Fazio, A.R., Russo, A. (2013). Probabilistic Approaches for the Steady-State Analysis of Distribution Systems with Wind Farms. In: Pardalos, P., Rebennack, S., Pereira, M., Iliadis, N., Pappu, V. (eds) Handbook of Wind Power Systems. Energy Systems. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41080-2_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41080-2_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41079-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41080-2

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics