Skip to main content

Meaningful Models

— A Research Agenda on Model-Driven Engineering —

  • Conference paper
  • 503 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 8195))

Abstract

An important question in software engineering is whether a program (or system) is correct with respect to its specification. The model-driven engineering discipline (MDE) is an approach to software development that supports domain-engineering, is generative and language-driven. We believe that this set of characteristics enable MDE as a suitable approach for the rigorous development of correct software systems as it allows us to focus on models rather than code. In this paper, we illustrate how programming languages theory, through operational semantics, and logic in computer science, through Description Logics, may help us identify meta-properties and techniques to reason about MDE models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akehurst, D., Kent, S.: A relational approach to defining transformations in a metamodel. In: Jézéquel, J.-M., Hussmann, H., Cook, S. (eds.) UML 2002. LNCS, vol. 2460, pp. 243–258. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Baader, F., Diego Calvanese, D.M., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.: The Description Logic Handbook. Cambridge University Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Berardi, D., Calvanese, D., Giacomo, G.D.: Reasoning on UML class diagrams. Artificial Intelligence 168, 70–118 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bézivin, J., Büttner, F., Gogolla, M., Jouault, F., Kurtev, I., Lindow, A.: Model Transformations? Transformation Models! In: Wang, J., Whittle, J., Harel, D., Reggio, G. (eds.) MoDELS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4199, pp. 440–453. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Braga, C.: Rewriting logic as a semantic framework for modular structural operational semantics. PhD thesis, DI, PUC-Rio, Brasil (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Braga, C., Santos, C., da Silva, V.T.: Consistency of model transformation contracts. Science of Computer Programming (with selected papers from SBMF 2011) (2011) (accepted for publication)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Büttner, F., Egea, M., Cabot, J.: On verifying ATL transformations using ‘off-the-shelf’ SMT solvers. In: France, R.B., Kazmeier, J., Breu, R., Atkinson, C. (eds.) MODELS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7590, pp. 432–448. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Cabot, J., Clarisó, R., Riera, D.: Verification of UML/OCL class diagrams using constraint programming. In: Proc. of IEEE Soft. Testing Verification and Validation Workshop, pp. 73–80 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cafezeiro, I., Haeusler, E.H., Rademaker, A.: Ontology and context. In: Proc. of PERCOM 2008, pp. 417–422. IEEE Computer Society (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Calvanese, D., Giacomo, G.D., Lenzerini, M.: Reasoning in expressive description logics with fixpoints based on automata on infinite trees. In: Proc. of IJCAI 1999, pp. 84–89 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cariou, E., Marvie, R., Seinturier, L., Duchien, L.: OCL for the specification of model transformation contracts. In: Proc. of OCL and Model Driven Eng. Workshop, pp. 69–83 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Clavel, M., Durán, F., Eker, S., Lincoln, P., Martí-Oliet, N., Meseguer, J., Talcott, C.: All About Maude - A High-Performance Logical Framework. LNCS, vol. 4350. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Clavel, M., Egea, M.: ITP/OCL: A rewriting-based validation tool for UML+OCL static class diagrams. In: Johnson, M., Vene, V. (eds.) AMAST 2006. LNCS, vol. 4019, pp. 368–373. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Clavel, M., Egea, M., de Dios, M.A.G.: Checking unsatisfiability for OCL constraints. In: MODELS 2009. Elec. Comm. of the EASST, vol. 24, pp. 1–13 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Göedel, K.: On formally undecidable propositions of principia methematica and related systems. Dover (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Van Gorp, P., Janssens, D.: Cavit: a consistency maintenance framework based on transformation contracts. In: Transformation Techniques in Soft. Eng., number 05161 in Dagstuhl Seminar Proc. (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hermann, F., Ehrig, H., Golas, U., Orejas, F.: Efficient analysis and execution of correct and complete model transformations based on triple graph grammars. In: Proc. of MDI 2010, pp. 22–31. ACM (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hopcroft, J.E., Motwani, R., Ullman, J.D.: Introduction to Automata Theory, Languages, and Computation, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kahn, G.: Natural semantics. In: Brandenburg, F.J., Wirsing, M., Vidal-Naquet, G. (eds.) STACS 1987. LNCS, vol. 247, pp. 22–39. Springer, Heidelberg (1987)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Kleppe, A.: Software Language Engineering. Addison-Wesley (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kleppe, A.G., Warmer, J., Bast, W.: MDA Explained. Addison-Wesley (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Libkin, L.: Elements of Finite Model Theory, 1st edn. Springer (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Meseguer, J., Roşu, G.: The rewriting logic semantics project. TCS 373(3), 213–237 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Milner, R.: Communicating and Mobile Systems: The π-calculus. Cambridge University Press (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mousavi, M.: Structuring Structural Operational Semantics. PhD thesis, Techsnische Universiteit Eindhoven (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. OMG. MOF QVT final adopted specification, OMG adopted specification ptc/05-11-01 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Petter, A., Behring, A., Mühlhäuser, M.: Solving constraints in model transformations. In: Paige, R.F. (ed.) ICMT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5563, pp. 132–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Plotkin, G.: A structural apporach to operational semantics. Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming 60-61, 17–139 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Queralt, A., Artale, A., Calvanese, D., Teniente, E.: OCL-Lite: Finite reasoning on UML/OCL conceptual schemas. Data & Knowledge Eng. 73, 1–22 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Verdejo, A., Martí-Oliet, N.: Executable structural operational semantics in maude. The Journal of Logic and Algebraic Programming 67(1), 226–293 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Wright, A.K., Felleisen, M.: A syntactic approach to type soundness. Information and Computation 115, 38–94 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Braga, C., Santos, C. (2013). Meaningful Models. In: Iyoda, J., de Moura, L. (eds) Formal Methods: Foundations and Applications. SBMF 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8195. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41071-0_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41071-0_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41070-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41071-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics