Abstract
This paper reviews the concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR) with a view toward understanding its meaning and component parts, and examines the business case for corporate social responsibility. The business case for CSR refers to arguments made in support of the reasons businesses should accept and advance CSR activities. The business case is concerned with CSR benefits to corporations, and particularly with the bottom-line financial gains for businesses pursuing CSR activities. In developing this paper, we provided conceptual definitions of CSR as well as arguments that have been made in favor of the notion of business assuming any responsibility to society beyond profit-seeking and maximizing its own financial wellbeing for its shareholders.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrams, F. (1954). Management responsibilities in a complex world. In A. B. Carroll (Ed.), (1979), Business education for competence and responsibility. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
Barnett, M. L. (2007). Stakeholder influence capacity and the variability of financial returns to corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32, 794–816.
Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1999), 490.
Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: When. Why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review, 47, 9–24.
Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2004). Voluntary social disclosure by large UK companies. Business Ethics: A European Review, 13(2/3), 86–99.
Bruch, H., & Walter, F. (2005). The keys to rethinking corporate philanthropy. MIT Sloan Management Review, 47, 48–56.
Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 500.
Carroll, A. B. (1991, July–August). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons.
Carroll, A. B., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2012). Business and society: Ethics, sustainability and stakeholder management (8th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105.
Chen, J. C., Dennis, M., & Roberts, R. (2008). Corporate charitable contributions: A corporate social performance or legitimacy strategy? Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 131–144.
De Schutter, O. (2008). Corporate social responsibility European style. European Law Journal, 14, 203–236.
Dechant, K., Altman, B., Downing, R. M., & Keeney, T. (1994). Environmental leadership: From compliance to competitive advantage. Academy of Management Executive, 8, 7–28.
Drucker, P. F. (1954). The practice of management. New York, NY: Collins.
Drucker, P. F. (2006). The effective executive: The definitive guide to getting the right things done. New York: Harper Collins.
European Commission. (2011). A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility, Brussels, 25.10.2011, COM (2011) 681 final. Available at: http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0681:FIN:EN:PDF
Fortune. (2003, May 26). Corporate America’s social conscience, S8.
Frederick, W. C. (1994). From CSR1 to CSR2: The maturing of business and society thought. Business and Society, 33(2), 150–64.
Friedman, M. (1962, September). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times, 126
Hart, S. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20, 986–1014.
Home Depot. (2009). Rebuilding hope and homes: Mapping our impact. Retrieved from http://rhh.homedepot.com/pc.htm
Kurucz, E., Barry, C., & Wheeler, D. (2008). Chapter 4: The business case for corporate social responsibility. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), The oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 83–112). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kamens, D. H. (1985). A theory of corporate civic giving. Sociological Perspectives, 28, 29–49.
Moir, L. (2001). What do we mean by corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance, 1(2), 16–22.
Phillips, R. R., Freeman, R. E., & Wicks, A. C. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not? Business Ethics Quarterly, 13, 479–502.
Pivato, S., Misani, N., & Tencati, A. (2008). The impact of corporate social responsibility on consumer trust: The case of organic food. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17, 3–12.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80, 56–69.
RED. (2009). The (RED) idea. Available at: http://www.joinred.com/Learn/AboutRed/Idea.aspx
Robinson, G., & Dechant, K. (1997). Building a business case for diversity. Academy of Management Executive, 11, 21–31.
Ronald McDonald House. (2010). Ronald McDonald house charities of Southern California, Available at: http://www.rmhcsc.org/
Lea, R. (2002). Corporate social responsibility, IoD member opinion survey. UK: The Institute of Directors.
Schwartz, M., & Carroll, A. B. (2008). Integrating and unifying competing and complimentary frameworks: The search for a common core in the business and society field. Business and Society, 47, 148–186.
Seifert, B., Morris, S. A., & Bartkus, B. R. (2003). Comparing big givers and small givers: Financial correlates of corporate philanthropy. Journal of Business Ethics, 45, 195–211.
Shrivastava, P. (1995). The role of corporations in achieving ecological sustainability. Academy of Management Review, 20, 936–960.
Smith, N. C. (2003). Corporate social responsibility: Whether or how? California Management Review, 45, 52–76.
Smith, T. (2005). Institutional and social investors find common ground. Journal of Investing, 14, 57–65.
Smith, S. M., & Alcron, D. S. (1991). Cause marketing: A new direction in the marketing of corporate responsibility. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 8, 19–35.
Stephenson, A. K. (2009). The pursuit of CSR and business ethics policies: Is it a source of competitive advantage for organizations? Journal of American Academy of Business, 14(2), 251–262.
Thomas, D., & Ely, R. (1996). Making differences matter: A new paradigm for managing diversity. Harvard Business Review, 74, 79–90.
Tokarski, K. (1999). Give and thou shall receive. Public Relations Quarterly, 44, 34–40.
Valor, C. (2008). Can consumers buy responsibly? Analysis and solutions for market failures. Journal of Consumer Policy, 31, 315–326.
WBCSD. (2012). Corporate social responsibility (CSR). Available at: http://www.wbcsd.org/work-program/business-role/previous-work/corporate-social-responsibility.aspx
Williamson, D., Lynch-Wood, G., & Ramsay, J. (2006). Drivers of environmental behavior in manufacturing SMEs and the implications for CSR. Journal of Business Ethics, 67, 317–330.
Yoplait. (2009). You did it. Available at: http://www,yoplait.com/slsl/
Yoplait. (2009) Commitment. Available at: http://www.yoplait.com/slsl/HowItWorks.aspx
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Okpara, J.O., Idowu, S.O. (2013). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review of the Concept and Analysis of the Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility in the Twenty-First Century. In: Okpara, J., Idowu, S. (eds) Corporate Social Responsibility. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40975-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40975-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40974-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40975-2
eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsBusiness and Management (R0)