Cooperative Design and Communities of Practice

  • Chris Johnson
  • Karen Bull
  • Jane Osmond
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8091)

Abstract

The focus of teaching and learning within Coventry University’s Automotive and Industrial Design course is to equip students with a passport to enter their professional community of practice [1] [2].

One of the core competencies contained within this passport is co-operative working and teamwork - seen as a fundamental aspect of the creative design process, from concept to production - and this is seen as a threshold concept within the course.

Therefore, to provide designers for industry it is imperative the discipline of co-operative working is part of the learning process as designers will be expected to interact with a wide range of disciplines ‘such as engineering, business, sociology, and psychology, among others’. [3]. And, in today’s global world, designers will often be expected to do so across geographical boundaries.

This paper presents four case studies, underpinned by feedback and work outputs designed to foster co-operative learning, from each year of the automotive and industrial design course.

Keywords

Teamwork Cooperation Design Reflection Community 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Wenger, E.: Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tovey, M., Bull, K.: Design Education as a Passport to Professional Practice. EPDE 10, ID 1 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Shin, D.: Design Collaboration: University-Industry Partnerships in New Product Development. In: International Association of Societies of Design Research: Design Rigor and Relevance, Seoul, October 18-22 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Johnson & Johnson (1999) quoted in Simpson, A.: Design Structures: improving the quality of in-class design critiques. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education 11 (1) (2012), doi: 10.1386/adch.11.1.63_1Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Meyer, J.H.F., Land, R.: Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge: linkages to ways of thinking and practicing within the disciplines. In: Rust, C. (ed.) Improving Student Learning. Improving Student Learning Theory and Practice— 10 years on, OCSLD, Oxford, pp. 412–424 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Osmond, J., Turner, A., Land, R.: Threshold Concepts and Spatial Awareness in Automotive Design. In: Land, R., Meyer, J. (eds.) Threshold Concepts within the Disciplines. Sense Publishers, Rotterdam (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hsiung, C.: The Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning. Journal of Engineering Education 101(1), 119–137 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schon (1987) quoted in Simpson, A.: Design Structures: improving the quality of in-class design critiques. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education 11(1) (2012), doi: 10.1386/adch.11.1.63_1Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Atkinson, P., Sierra Zuluaga, L., Osmond, J.: The Terrain is Different Over There: Student perceptions of an international co-operative transport design project. In: Researching Beyond Boundaries, Academic Communities without Borders, Inquiring Pedagogies Research Network (IPED) Conference. Coventry University (September 2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Osmond, J., Clough, B.: A Assessing Design through Assessment Buddies. In: Research: Uncertainty Contradiction Value: DRS Biennial International Conference, Bangkok, July 1-4 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    NSS. The National Student Survey 2013 (2013), http://www.thestudentsurvey.com (accessed April 8)
  12. 12.
    Schon (1987) quoted in Karakaya, A., Enyapılı, A.: Rehearsal of professional practice: impacts of web-based collaborative learning on the future encounter of different disciplines. International Journal of Technology Design Education (2007), doi 10.1007/s10798-006-9013-1Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Blair, B.: At the end of a huge crit in the summer, it was “crap” – I’d worked really hard but all she said was “fine” and I was gutted. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education 5(2) (2006)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Buchanan, R.: Wicked Problems in Design Thinking. Design Issues 8(2) (Spring 1992)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Johnson
    • 1
  • Karen Bull
    • 1
  • Jane Osmond
    • 1
  1. 1.Coventry UniversityUK

Personalised recommendations