Skip to main content

Analysing the Impact of Built-In and External Social Tools in a MOOC on Educational Technologies

  • Conference paper

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNPSE,volume 8095)

Abstract

MOOCs have been a disruptive educational trend in the last months. Some MOOCs just replicate traditional teaching pedagogies, adding multimedia elements like video lectures. Others go beyond, trying to engage the massive number of participants by promoting discussions and relying on their contributions to the course. MOOC platforms usually provide some built-in social tools for this purpose, although instructors or participants may suggest others to foster discussions and crowdsourcing. This paper analyses the impact of two built-in (Q&A and forum) and three external social tools (Facebook, Twitter and MentorMob) in a MOOC on educational technologies. Most of the participants agreed on the importance of social tools to be in touch with their partners and share information related to the course, the forum being the one preferred. Furthermore, the lessons learned from the enactment of this MOOC employing social tools are summarized so that others may benefit from them.

Keywords

  • MOOCs
  • Social Tools
  • Educational Technologies
  • Crowdsourcing

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-40814-4_2
  • Chapter length: 14 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-642-40814-4
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Daniel, J.: Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and Possibility. Technical report, Korea National Open University (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hyman, P.: In the Year of Disruptive Education. Communications of the ACM 55(12), 20–22 (2012)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper, S., Sahami, M.: Reflections on Stanford’s MOOCs. Communications of the ACM 56(2), 28–30 (2013)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. Martin, F.G.: Will Massive Open Online Courses Change How We Teach? Communications of the ACM 55(8), 26–28 (2012)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. Kolowich, S.: How will MOOCs make Money? Inside Higher Ed. (2012), http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2012/06/11/experts-speculate-possible-business-models-mooc-providers

  6. Downes, S.: The Role of the Educator. Huffington Post Education (2010), http://huffingtonpost.com/stephen-downes/the-role-of-the-educator_b_790937.html

  7. Kop, R., Fournier, H., Mak, J.S.F.: A pedagogy of Abundance or a Pedagogy to Support Human Beings? Participant Support on Massive Open Online Courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 12(7), 74–93 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mackness, J., Mak, S., Williams, R.: The Ideals and Reality of Participating in a MOOC. In: Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., Hodgson, V., Jones, C., de Laat, M., McConnell, D., Ryberg, T. (eds.) 7th Int. Conference on Networked Learning, pp. 266–274 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Siemens, G.: Knowing knowledge. Lulu Press, Vancouver (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Masters, K.: A Brief Guide to Understanding MOOCs. The Internet Journal of Medical Education 1(2) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Severance, C.: Teaching the World: Daphne Koller and Coursera. Computers 45(8), 8–9 (2012)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Clow, D.: MOOCs and the funnel of participation. In: 3rd Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 185–189. ACM, New York (2013)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  13. Shedroff, N.: Experience design 1.1: A manifesto for the design of experiences. Experience Design Books (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. MoocGuide, 4. Designing a MOOC using social media tools, http://moocguide.wikispaces.com/4.+Designing+a+MOOC+using+social+media+tools

  15. Khalil, H., Ebner, M.: Interaction Possibilities in MOOCs – How Do They Actually Happen? In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Higher Education Development (accepted, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Belanger, Y., Thornton, J.: Bioelectricity: A Quantitative Approach, Duke University’s First MOOC. Technical Report, Duke University, NC, USA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hill, P.: Emerging Student Patterns in MOOCs: A Graphical View (2013), http://mfeldstein.com/emerging_student_patterns_in_moocs_graphical_view

  18. Hill, P.: Emerging Student Patterns in MOOCs: A (Revised) Graphical View (2013), http://mfeldstein.com/emerging-student-patterns-in-moocs-a-revised-graphical-view

  19. Laurillard, D.: Re-Thinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technologies. Routeledge, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Young, J.R.: Coursera Announces Details for Selling Certificates and Verifying Identities. The Chronicle of Higher Education (2013), http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/coursera-announces-details-for-selling-certificates-and-verifying-identities/41519

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Alario-Hoyos, C., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Delgado-Kloos, C., Parada G., H.A., Muñoz-Organero, M., Rodríguez-de-las-Heras, A. (2013). Analysing the Impact of Built-In and External Social Tools in a MOOC on Educational Technologies. In: Hernández-Leo, D., Ley, T., Klamma, R., Harrer, A. (eds) Scaling up Learning for Sustained Impact. EC-TEL 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8095. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40814-4_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40814-4_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40813-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40814-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)