Analysing the Impact of Built-In and External Social Tools in a MOOC on Educational Technologies

  • Carlos Alario-Hoyos
  • Mar Pérez-Sanagustín
  • Carlos Delgado-Kloos
  • Hugo A. Parada G.
  • Mario Muñoz-Organero
  • Antonio Rodríguez-de-las-Heras
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8095)

Abstract

MOOCs have been a disruptive educational trend in the last months. Some MOOCs just replicate traditional teaching pedagogies, adding multimedia elements like video lectures. Others go beyond, trying to engage the massive number of participants by promoting discussions and relying on their contributions to the course. MOOC platforms usually provide some built-in social tools for this purpose, although instructors or participants may suggest others to foster discussions and crowdsourcing. This paper analyses the impact of two built-in (Q&A and forum) and three external social tools (Facebook, Twitter and MentorMob) in a MOOC on educational technologies. Most of the participants agreed on the importance of social tools to be in touch with their partners and share information related to the course, the forum being the one preferred. Furthermore, the lessons learned from the enactment of this MOOC employing social tools are summarized so that others may benefit from them.

Keywords

MOOCs Social Tools Educational Technologies Crowdsourcing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Daniel, J.: Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and Possibility. Technical report, Korea National Open University (2012)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hyman, P.: In the Year of Disruptive Education. Communications of the ACM 55(12), 20–22 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cooper, S., Sahami, M.: Reflections on Stanford’s MOOCs. Communications of the ACM 56(2), 28–30 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Martin, F.G.: Will Massive Open Online Courses Change How We Teach? Communications of the ACM 55(8), 26–28 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
  6. 6.
    Downes, S.: The Role of the Educator. Huffington Post Education (2010), http://huffingtonpost.com/stephen-downes/the-role-of-the-educator_b_790937.html
  7. 7.
    Kop, R., Fournier, H., Mak, J.S.F.: A pedagogy of Abundance or a Pedagogy to Support Human Beings? Participant Support on Massive Open Online Courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 12(7), 74–93 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mackness, J., Mak, S., Williams, R.: The Ideals and Reality of Participating in a MOOC. In: Dirckinck-Holmfeld, L., Hodgson, V., Jones, C., de Laat, M., McConnell, D., Ryberg, T. (eds.) 7th Int. Conference on Networked Learning, pp. 266–274 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Siemens, G.: Knowing knowledge. Lulu Press, Vancouver (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Masters, K.: A Brief Guide to Understanding MOOCs. The Internet Journal of Medical Education 1(2) (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Severance, C.: Teaching the World: Daphne Koller and Coursera. Computers 45(8), 8–9 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Clow, D.: MOOCs and the funnel of participation. In: 3rd Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge, pp. 185–189. ACM, New York (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shedroff, N.: Experience design 1.1: A manifesto for the design of experiences. Experience Design Books (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    MoocGuide, 4. Designing a MOOC using social media tools, http://moocguide.wikispaces.com/4.+Designing+a+MOOC+using+social+media+tools
  15. 15.
    Khalil, H., Ebner, M.: Interaction Possibilities in MOOCs – How Do They Actually Happen? In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Higher Education Development (accepted, 2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Belanger, Y., Thornton, J.: Bioelectricity: A Quantitative Approach, Duke University’s First MOOC. Technical Report, Duke University, NC, USA (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hill, P.: Emerging Student Patterns in MOOCs: A Graphical View (2013), http://mfeldstein.com/emerging_student_patterns_in_moocs_graphical_view
  18. 18.
    Hill, P.: Emerging Student Patterns in MOOCs: A (Revised) Graphical View (2013), http://mfeldstein.com/emerging-student-patterns-in-moocs-a-revised-graphical-view
  19. 19.
    Laurillard, D.: Re-Thinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technologies. Routeledge, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Young, J.R.: Coursera Announces Details for Selling Certificates and Verifying Identities. The Chronicle of Higher Education (2013), http://chronicle.com/blogs/wiredcampus/coursera-announces-details-for-selling-certificates-and-verifying-identities/41519

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos Alario-Hoyos
    • 1
  • Mar Pérez-Sanagustín
    • 1
  • Carlos Delgado-Kloos
    • 1
  • Hugo A. Parada G.
    • 1
  • Mario Muñoz-Organero
    • 1
  • Antonio Rodríguez-de-las-Heras
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Telematic EngineeringUniversidad Carlos III de MadridLeganésSpain
  2. 2.Faculty of Humanities, Communication and DocumentationUniversidad Carlos III de MadridGetafeSpain

Personalised recommendations