A Tensor-Based Population Value Decomposition to Explain Rectal Toxicity after Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy
In prostate cancer radiotherapy the association between the dose distribution and the occurrence of undesirable side-effects is yet to be revealed. In this work a method to perform population analysis by comparing the dose distributions is proposed. The method is a tensor-based approach that generalises an existing method for 2D images and allows for the highlighting of over irradiated zones correlated with rectal bleeding after prostate cancer radiotherapy. Thus, the aim is to contribute to the elucidation of the dose patterns correlated with rectal toxicity. The method was applied to a cohort of 63 patients and it was able to build up a dose pattern characterizing the difference between patients presenting rectal bleeding after prostate cancer radiotherapy and those who did not.
KeywordsSingular Value Decomposition Dose Distribution Rectal Bleeding Normality Assumption Normal Tissue Complication Probability
- 3.Fiorino, C., Vavassori, V., Sanguineti, G., Bianchi, C., Cattaneo, G.M., Piazzolla, A., Cozzarini, C.: Rectum contouring variability in patients treated for prostate cancer: impact on rectum dose-volume histograms and normal tissue complication probability. Radiother. Oncol. 63, 249–255 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Buettner, F., Gulliford, S.L., Webb, S., Sydes, M.R., Dearnaley, D.P., Partridge, M.: Assessing correlations between the spatial distribution of the dose to the rectal wall and late rectal toxicity after prostate radiotherapy: An analysis of data from the mrc rt01 trial (isrctn 47772397). Physics in Medicine and Biology 54, 6535 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Chen, B., et al.: Spatial characterization and classification of rectal bleeding in prostate cancer radiotherapy with a voxel-based principal components analysis model for 3D dose distribution. In: Madabhushi, A., Dowling, J., Huisman, H., Barratt, D. (eds.) Prostate Cancer Imaging 2011. LNCS, vol. 6963, pp. 60–69. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Beckendorf, V., Guerif, S., Le Prisé, E., Cosset, J.M., Bougnoux, A., Chauvet, B., Salem, N., Chapet, O., Bourdain, S., Bachaud, J.M., Maingon, P., Hannoun-Levi, J.M., Malissard, L., Simon, J.M., Pommier, P., Hay, M., Dubray, B., Lagrange, J.L., Luporsi, E., Bey, P.: 70 gy versus 80 gy in localized prostate cancer: 5-year results of getug 06 randomized trial. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics 80, 1056–1063 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar