Incorporating Shape Variability in Image Segmentation via Implicit Template Deformation

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8151)


Implicit template deformation is a model-based segmentation framework that was successfully applied in several medical applications. In this paper, we propose a method to learn and use prior knowledge on shape variability in such framework. This shape prior is learnt via an original and dedicated process in which both an optimal template and principal modes of variations are estimated from a collection of shapes. This learning strategy requires neither a pre-alignment of the training shapes nor one-to-one correspondences between shape sample points. We then generalize the implicit template deformation formulation to automatically select the most plausible deformation as a shape prior. This novel framework maintains the two main properties of implicit template deformation: topology preservation and computational efficiency. Our approach can be applied to any organ with a possibly complex shape but fixed topology. We validate our method on myocardium segmentation from cardiac magnetic resonance short-axis images and demonstrate segmentation improvement over standard template deformation.


Image Segmentation Regularization Term Residual Deformation Shape Constraint Shape Variability 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Saddi, K., et al.: Region-Based Segmentation via Non-Rigid Template Matching. In: ICCV, vol. 1, pp. 1–7 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mory, B., Somphone, O., Prevost, R., Ardon, R.: Real-Time 3D Image Segmentation by User-Constrained Template Deformation. In: Ayache, N., Delingette, H., Golland, P., Mori, K. (eds.) MICCAI 2012, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7510, pp. 561–568. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Prevost, R., et al.: Kidney Detection and Real-Time Segmentation in 3D Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Images. In: IEEE ISBI, pp. 1559–1562 (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cuingnet, R., Prevost, R., Lesage, D., Cohen, L.D., Mory, B., Ardon, R.: Automatic Detection and Segmentation of Kidneys in 3D CT Images Using Random Forests. In: Ayache, N., Delingette, H., Golland, P., Mori, K. (eds.) MICCAI 2012, Part III. LNCS, vol. 7512, pp. 66–74. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cremers, D., et al.: A Review of Statistical Approaches to Level Set Segmentation: Integrating Color, Texture, Motion and Shape. IJCV 72(2), 195–215 (2007)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Heimann, T., Meinzer, H.P.: Statistical Shape Models for 3D Medical Image Segmentation: a Review. Medical Image Analysis 13(4), 543 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cootes, T.F., et al.: Active Shape Models-Their Training and Application. Computer Vision and Image Understanding 61(1), 38–59 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rousson, M., Paragios, N.: Shape Priors for Level Set Representations. In: Heyden, A., Sparr, G., Nielsen, M., Johansen, P. (eds.) ECCV 2002, Part II. LNCS, vol. 2351, pp. 78–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tsai, A., et al.: A Shape-Based Approach to the Segmentation of Medical Imagery using Level Sets. Trans. Med. Imaging 22(2), 137–154 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vaillant, M., et al.: Statistics on Diffeomorphisms via Tangent Space Representations. NeuroImage 23(1), 161 (2004)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Arsigny, V., Commowick, O., Pennec, X., Ayache, N.: A Log-Euclidean Framework for Statistics on Diffeomorphisms. In: Larsen, R., Nielsen, M., Sporring, J. (eds.) MICCAI 2006. LNCS, vol. 4190, pp. 924–931. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Joshi, S., et al.: Unbiased Diffeomorphic Atlas Construction for Computational Anatomy. NeuroImage 23(1), 151 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rueckert, D., Frangi, A.F., Schnabel, J.A.: Automatic Construction of 3D Statistical Deformation Models using Non-Rigid Registration. In: Niessen, W.J., Viergever, M.A. (eds.) MICCAI 2001. LNCS, vol. 2208, pp. 77–84. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Leventon, M., et al.: Statistical Shape Influence in Geodesic Active Contours. In: CVPR, pp. 316–323 (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Philips Research MedisysSuresnesFrance
  2. 2.CEREMADE UMR 7534, CNRSUniversité Paris DauphineParisFrance

Personalised recommendations