Measuring Users’ Emotions with a Component-Based Approach

  • Rogério Aparecido Campanari Xavier
  • Vânia Paula de Almeida Neris
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 141)

Abstract

The emotional experience is present in all types of interaction between human beings. Therefore, it is vital to consider the emotional experience during the design process of users’ interfaces to inspire greater confidence among users as well as for the interface to be easier to learn and use. Considering the complexity of the subject, it is necessary to combine methods to minimize the detection of false positives in the evaluation of the user’s emotional state while interacting with information systems. This work presents a hybrid evaluation approach based on the emotion model described by Scherer [1]. The proposed approach allows designers to check whether the information system creates a positive, neutral or negative emotional reaction in the users. A feasibility study was conducted in which an emotional evaluation of a web system was performed based on a group of elderly users using tablet devices.

Keywords

Emotion Users’ emotional experience Emotional evaluation Information systems 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by CAPES - Brazil. The authors thank colleagues from LIFeS-UFSCar for their insightful comments. The authors especially thank the elderly users, who gladly received the research group and participated in the feasibility study, the designers and the referees for their contributions.

References

  1. 1.
    Scherer, K.R.: On the Nature and Function of Emotion: A Component Process Approach. In: Scherer, K.R., Ekman, P. (eds.) Approaches to Emotion, pp. 293–317. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1984)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cristescu, I.: Emotions in human-computer interaction: the role of nonverbal behavior in interactive systems. Revista Informática Econômica 2(46), 110–116 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lim, Y.-K., Donaldson, J., Jung, H., Kunz, B., Royer, D., Ramalingam, S., Thirumaran, S., Stolterman, E.: Emotional experience and interaction design. In: Peter, C., Beale, R. (eds.) Affect and Emotion in Human-Computer Interaction,LNCS, vol. 4868, pp. 116–129. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mahlke, S., Minge, M.: Consideration of multiple components of emotions in human-technology interaction. In: Peter, C., Beale, R. (eds.) Affect and Emotion in Human-Computer Interaction, LNCS, vol. 4868, pp. 51–62. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Scherer, K.R.: What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Soc. Sci. Inf. 44(4), 695–729 (2005) (SAGE Publications)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Beale, R., Peter, C.: The role of affect and emotion in HCI. In: Peter, C., Beale, R. (eds.) Affect and Emotion in Human-Computer Interaction. LNCS, vol. 4868, pp. 1–11. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Norman, D.A.: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Piccolo, L.S.G., Hayashi, E.C.S., Baranauskas, M.C.C.: The evaluation of affective quality in social software: preliminary thoughts. In: II WAIHCWS, IHC2010, pp. 29–38 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hayashi, E., Neris, V., Baranauskas, C., Martins, M.C., Piccolo, L., Costa, R.: Avaliando a qualidade afetiva de sistemas computacionais interativos no cenário brasileiro. In: Usabilidade, Acessibilidade e Inteligibilidade Aplicadas em Interfaces para Analfabetos, Idosos e Pessoas com Deficiência: Resultados do Workshop. Campinas: CPqD, pp. 55–62 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lera, E., Domingo, M.G.: Ten emotion heuristics: guidelines for assessing the user’s affective dimension easily and cost-effectively. In: BCSHCI ‘07 Proceedings of the 21st British HCI Group Annual Conference on People and Computers: HCI…but not as we know it, 2, pp. 163–166. British Computer Society, Swinton (2007)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Russell, J.A.: Affect grid: a single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 57(3), 493–502 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yusoff, N.M., Salim, S.S.: SCOUT and affective interaction design: evaluating physiological signals for usability in emotional processing. In: Second International Conference on Computer Engineering and Technology (ICCET), 2010, pp. 201–205 (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Picard, R.W.: Emotion reserach by the people, for the people. Emot. Rev. 2(3), 250–254 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ortony, A., Clore, G.L., Collins, A.: The cognitive structure of emotions. Press Syndicate of University of Cambridge, Cambridge (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Osgood, C.E., May, W.H., Miron, M.S.: Cross-Cultural Universals of Affective Meaning, 1st edn. University of Illinois Press, Urbana (1975)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Russell, J.A.: Pancultural aspects of the human conceptual organization of emotions. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 45(6), 1281–1288 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Desmet, P.M.A.: A multilayered model of product emotions. Des. J. 6(2), 4–11 (2003)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Russel, J.A.: A circumplex model of affect. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 8(6), 1161–1178 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shami, N.S., et. al.: Measuring affect in HCI: going beyond the individual. In: CHI EA ‘08 CHI ‘08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Longhi, M.T., Reategui, E.B., Bercht, M., Behar, P.A.: Um estudo sobre os Fenômenos Afetivos e Cognitivos em Interfaces para Softwares Educativos. In: Ciclo de Palestras Novas Tecnologias na Educação, vol. 9 (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Scherer, K.R.: Emotion. In: Introduction to Social Psychology: A European Perspective, vol. 3, pp. 151–191. Blackwell, Oxford (2000)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Palen, L., Bödker, S.: Don’t get emotional. In: Peter, C., Beale, R. (eds.) Affect and Emotion in Human-Computer Interaction. LNCS, vol. 4868, pp. 12–22. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Demir, E., Desmet, P.M.A., Hekkert, P.: Appraisal patterns of emotions in human-product interaction. Int. J. Des. 3(2), 41–51 (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Laurans, G., Desmet, P.M.A., Hekkert, P.P.M.: Assessing emotion in interaction: some problems and a new approach. In: International Conference on Designing Pleasurable products and Interfaces, pp. 13–16 (2009)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Desmet, P.M.A.: Measuring emotions: development and application of an instrument to measure emotional responses to products. In: Blythe, M.A., Monk, A.F., Overbeeke, K., Wright, P.C. (eds.) Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment, pp. 111–125. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2003)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Geneva Appraisal Questionnaire Format, Development, and Utilization. http://www.affective-sciences.org/system/files/page/2636/GAQ_English.PDF
  27. 27.
    Someren, M.W., Barnard, Y.F., Sandberg, J.A.C.: The Think Aloud Method: A practical Guide to Modeling Cognitive Processes. Academic Press, London (1994)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lefèvre, F., Lefèvre, A.M.C.: Discurso do sujeito coletivo - Um novo enfoque em pesquisa qualitativa (Desdobramentos). Livraria Resposta (2005)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Lang, P.J.: The cognitive psychophysiology of emotion: Fear and anxiety, pp. 131–170. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1985)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Reijneveld, K., Looze, M., Krause, F., Desmet, P.: Measuring the emotions elicited by office chairs. In: DPPI ‘03 Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interface, pp. 6–10 (2003)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Izard, C.E.: The Psychology of Emotions. Plenum Press, New York (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mehrabian, A., Russell, J.A.: An Approach to Environmental Psychology. MIT, Cambridge (1974)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Russell, J.A., Mehrabian, A.: Evidence for a Three-Factor Theory of Emotions. J. Res. Pers. 11, 273–294 (1977)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Watson, D., Clark, L.A., Tellegen, A.: Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54(6), 1063–1070 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Watson, D., Clark, A.: The PANAS-X: Manual for the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule - Expanded Form. Psychology Publications, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Cahour, B., Salembier, P., Brassac, C., Bouraoui, J.L., Pachoud, B., Vermersch, P., Zouinar, M.: Methodologies for evaluating the affective experience of a mediated interaction. In: Workshop on Innovative Approaches to Evaluating Affective Interfaces, CHI 2005, April 2–7, Portland, Oregon (2006)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ekman, P., Friesen, W.V., Hager, J.C.: The Facial Action Coding Systems, 2nd edn, Salt Lake City: Research Nexus eBook. Weidenfeld & Nicolson, London (world) (2002)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zaman, B., Smith, T.S.: The FaceReader: Measuring instant fun of use. In: NordiCHI 2006, pp. 14–18 (2006)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Axelrod, L., Hone, K.: Measuring affect: differentiating positive affect and politeness. In: CHI 2008 Workshop (2008)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Lichtenstein, A., Oehme, A., Kupschick, S., Jürgensohn, T.: Comparing two emotion models for deriving affective states from physiological data. In: Peter, C., Beale, R. (eds.) Affect and Emotion in Human-Computer Interaction. LNCS, vol. 4868, pp. 35–50. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rogério Aparecido Campanari Xavier
    • 1
  • Vânia Paula de Almeida Neris
    • 1
  1. 1.Sustainable and Flexible Interaction Laboratory, Department of ComputingFederal University of São CarlosSão CarlosBrazil

Personalised recommendations