Introducing New Technology in Educational Contexts: Schools as Organizations

  • Elaine C. S. Hayashi
  • M. Cecília Martins
  • M. Cecília C. Baranauskas
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 141)

Abstract

The school context offers many opportunities to explore the use of digital technologies. When designing for schools, systems designers usually tend to consider only the students or, at most, teachers and students. However, schools are complex social organizations that are composed by many other interested parties. When aiming at solutions that make sense to the users, the entire school, as an organization, should be considered. This paper, presents the activities we conducted at an elementary public school in Brazil, facing the challenge of constructing meaning for a new digital artifact. For the analysis of organization and context we used adapted practices from Organizational Semiotics (OS) and Participatory Design (PD). Our results suggest that both OS and PD are suitable for educational projects and they can anticipate problems and propose solutions for prospective use of technology in such contexts.

Keywords

Human-computer interaction Participatory design Organizational semiotics Educational technology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank CNpQ (processes# 143487/2011, 475105/2010-9 and 560044/2010-0) for financial support; and our colleagues from UNICAMP and EMEF Padre Emílio Miotti for inspiring discussions and support.

References

  1. 1.
    Amiel, T., Arantes, F., Miranda, L., Martins, M.C., Baranauskas, M.C.: A Participatory Approach to Scenario Development for XO Laptops in Brazil. Paper presented at the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, Lisbon, Portugal (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Baranauskas, M.C.C., Schimiguel, J., Simoni, C.A.C., Medeiros, C.M.B.: Guiding the process of requirements elicitation with a semiotic approach In: Proceedings of HCI International, vol. 3, pp.100–111 (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Baranauskas, M.C.C.: Socially aware computing. In: Proceedings of ICECE 2009, pp. 1–5 (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bonacin, R., Baranauskas, M.C.C.: Semiotic conference: work signs and participatory design. In: 10th HCI International, pp. 38–43 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cervantes, R., Warschauer, M., Nardi, B., Sambasivan, N.: Infrastructures for low-cost laptop use in Mexican schools. In: Proceedings of CHI’11, pp. 945–954 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    CGI ICT Education 2010: Survey on the use of information and communication technologies in Brazilian Schools. http://www.cetic.br/tic/provedores/index.htm Accessed Feb 2012
  7. 7.
    Corrêa, A.G.D., Assis, G.A., Ficheman, I.K., Venâncio, V., Lopes, R.D.: Avaliação de Aceitabilidade de um Computador Portátil de Baixo Custo por Criança. In: Proceedings of SBIE (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Escalona, M.J., Torres-Zenteno, A., Gutierrez, J., Martins, E., Torres, R.S., Baranauskas, M.C.C.: A Development Process for Web Geographic Information System. In: ICEIS 2008, pp. 112–117 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Flores, P., Hourcade, J.P.: One year of experiences with XO laptops in Uruguay. Interactions 16(4), 52–55 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Furtado, M.E.S., Kampf, T., Piccolo, L.S.G., Baranauskas, M.C.C.: Prospecting the appropriation of the digital TV in a Brazilian Project. Comput. Entertain. 7, 10–32 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guimarães, M.S., Baranauskas, M.C.C., Martins, E.: Communication-based modeling and inspection in critical systems. In: ICEIS 2008, v. HCI, pp. 215–220 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hayashi, E.C.S., Baranauskas, M.C.C.: The affectibility concept in systems for learning contexts. Int. J. e-Learning Secur. (IJeLS) (IJeLS), 1(1/2), 10–18 (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kolkman, M.: Problem articulation methodology. Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands (1993)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lim, C.P.: A theoretical framework for the study of ICT in schools: a proposal. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 33(4), 411–421 (2002)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu, K.: Semiotics in Information Systems and Engineering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Liu, X.: Employing MEASUR methods for business process reengineering in China. Ph.D. thesis, University of Twente, The Netherlands (2001)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Liu, K., Sun, L., Tan, S.: Using problem articulation method to assist planning and management of complex projects. In: Project Management and Risk Management in Complex Projects , Part 1, pp. 3–13 (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Maike, V.R.L.M., Miranda, L.C., Baranauskas, M.C.C.: Investigando sobre Requisitos para um Jogo de RPG com Professores de uma Escola Pública de Ensino Fundamental. In: SBIE 2011 XXII Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação, 2011, Aracaju. Anais do XXII SBIE - XVII WIE. Aracaju (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Melo, A.M., Baranauskas, M.C.C., Soares, S.C.de M.: Design com Crianças: da Prática a um Modelo de Processo. In: Revista Brasileira de Informática na Educação, vol. 16(1), pp. 43–55 (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    MEC/INEP. Resumo técnico - censo escolar 2010. http://portal.mec.gov.br/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=7277&Itemid. Accessed Feb 2012
  21. 21.
    Miranda, L.C., Hayashi, E.C.S., Assis, R., Martins, M.C., Baranauskas, M.C.C.: Laptop XO Dentro e Fora da Sala de Aula: Expressão, Diversão e Alfabetização. In: XXII Simpósio Brasileiro de Informática na Educação (SBIE) & XVII Workshop de Informática na Escola (WIE), pp. 1352–1361 (2011)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Moody, L., Schimidt, G.: Going wireless: the emergence of wireless networks in education. J. Comput. Sci. Coll. 19(4), pp.151–158 (2004)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Muller, J.M.: Participatory design. Commun. ACM 36(6), 26–28 (1993)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Neris, V.P.A., Almeida, L.D., Miranda, L.C., Hayashi, E.C.S., Baranauskas, M.C.C.: Collective construction of meaning and system for an inclusive social network. In: IJISSC, vol. 2(2), p.20 (2011)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    OLPC: http://one.laptop.org/ Accessed in January 2012
  26. 26.
    Papert, S.: The Children’s Machine: Rethinking School. In: The Age Of The Computer. HarperCollins (1993)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Schimiguel, J., Melo, A.M., Baranauskas, M.C.C., Medeiros, C.M.B.: Accessibility as a quality requirement: Geographic information systems on the web. In: Proceedings of CLIHC’05, pp. 8–19 (2005)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schuler, D., Namioka, A.: Participatory design: Principles and practices. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ (1993)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Silva, B.F., Romani, R., Baranauskas, M.C.C.: SOO Brasileiro: Aprendizagem e Diversão no XO. In: RBIE, vol. 16(3), pp. 29–41 (2008)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stamper, R.K.: In Requirements Engineering, Technical and Social Aspects. Academic Press, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stamper, R.K.: A semiotic theory of information and information systems/applied semiotics. In: Invited Papers for the ICL/University of Newcastle Seminar on “Information”, pp. 6–10 (1993b)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stamper, R., Liu, K., Hafkamp, M., Ades, Y.: Understanding the roles of signs and norms in organisations: a semiotic approach to information systems design. J. Behav. Inf. Technol. 19(1), 15–27 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    XO Project (2010) XO na Escola e Fora Dela: Uma Proposta Semio-Participativa para Tecnologia, Educação e Sociedade. CNPq, 475105/2010-9 (http://www.nied.unicamp.br/xounicamp/) Accessed 20 Sept 2012

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elaine C. S. Hayashi
    • 1
  • M. Cecília Martins
    • 2
  • M. Cecília C. Baranauskas
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute of ComputingUniversity of CampinasCampinasBrazil
  2. 2.NIEDUniversity of CampinasCampinasBrazil

Personalised recommendations