Advertisement

Using Information Visualization and Text Mining to Facilitate the Conduction of Systematic Literature Reviews

  • Sandra Fabbri
  • Elis Hernandes
  • Andre Di Thommazo
  • Anderson Belgamo
  • Augusto Zamboni
  • Cleiton Silva
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 141)

Abstract

Systematic Literature Review (SLR or SR) and Systematic Mapping (SM) are scientific literature review techniques that follow well-defined stages, according to a protocol previously elaborated. Besides systematizing the search for relevant studies, the SR predicts the organization and the analysis of the obtained results. However, the SR application is laborious because there are many steps to be followed. Aiming to offer computational support to SR and SM, the StArt (State of the Art through Systematic Review) tool was developed. Besides helping the steps of SR or SM, the StArt tool has implemented visualization and text mining techniques to support the conduction and the reporting of the SR or SM. A comparative analysis was carried out in relation to StArt and other similar tools.

Keywords

Systematic literature review Systematic mapping Tool Visualization 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the students and researchers who have been used StArt and are giving constant feedback to development team and CNPq, CAPES and Observatório da Educação Project for financial support.

References

  1. 1.
    Pai, M., McCulloch, M., Gorman, J.D., Pai, N., Enanoria, W., Kennedy, G., Tharyan, P., Colford Jr, J.M.: Clinical research methods - systematic reviews and meta-analyses: an illustrated, step-by-step guide. Natl Med. J. India 17, 89–95 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kitchenham, B.A.: Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Software Engineering Group, Keele University, Keele, Tech. Rep. TR/SE 0401 (2004) Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Petersen, K., et al.: Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, Bari, Italy (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Montebelo, R.P., et al.: SRAT (Systematic Review Automatic Tool) Uma Ferramenta Computacional de Apoio à Revisão Sistemática. In: V Experimental Software Engineering Latin American Workshop, ICMC-São Carlos (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zamboni, A.B., Thommazo, A.D., Hernandes, E.C.M., Fabbri, S.C.P.F.: StArt Uma Ferramenta Computacional de Apoio à Revisão Sistemática. In: Brazilian Conference on Software: Theory and Practice - Tools session, UFBA (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hernandes, E.C.M., Zamboni, A.B., Thommazo, A.D., Fabbri, S.C.P.F.: Avaliação da ferramenta StArt utilizando o modelo TAM e o paradigma GQM. In: X Experimental Software Engineering Latin American Workshop, ICMC-São Carlos (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Burley, D.: Information visualization as a knowledge integration tool. J. Knowl. Manage. Pract. 11 (2010) Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kitchenham, B.A.: Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software. Software Engineering Group, Keele University, Keele, University of Durham, Durham, Tech. Rep. EBSE-2007-01 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gershon, N., Eick, S.G., Card, S.: Information visualization interactions. ACM Interact. 5, 9–15 (1998) (ACM Press)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dunne, C., Shneiderman, B., Gove, R., Klavans, J., Dorr, B.: Rapid understanding of scientific paper collections: integrating statistics, text analytics, and visualization. JASIST: J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 63, 2351–2369 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boell, S.K., Cezec-Kecmanovic, D.: Are systematic reviews better, less biased and of higher quality? In: Proceedings of the European Conference on Information Systems, Helsinki, Finland (2010)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Salton, G.: Automatic Text Processing: The Transformation, Analysis and Retrieval of Information by Computer. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1989)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Salton, G., Allan, J.: Text retrieval using the vector processing model. In: Symposium on Document Analysis and Information Retrieval. University of Nevada, Las Vegas (1994)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Malheiros, V., Höhn, E., Pinho, R., Mendonça, M., Maldonado, J.C.: A visual text mining approach for systematic reviews. In: International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM, pp. 245–254 (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Felizardo, K.R., et al.: Using visual text mining to support the study selection activity in systematic literature reviews. In: International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM, pp. 77–86 (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Fernández-Sáez, A.M., Genero, M., Romero, F.P.: SLR-Tool: a tool for performing systematic literature reviews. In: Proceedings of the JISBD, pp. 329–332 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sandra Fabbri
    • 1
  • Elis Hernandes
    • 1
  • Andre Di Thommazo
    • 1
    • 2
  • Anderson Belgamo
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Augusto Zamboni
    • 1
  • Cleiton Silva
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.LaPES-Software Engineering Research LabUniversidade Federal de São CarlosSão CarlosBrazil
  2. 2.Instituto Federal de EducaçãoCiência e Tecnologia de São PauloSão CarlosBrazil
  3. 3.Methodist University of PiracicabaPiracicabaBrazil

Personalised recommendations