Abstract
Propositional model counting (#SAT), i.e., counting the number of satisfying assignments of a propositional formula, is a problem of significant theoretical and practical interest. Due to the inherent complexity of the problem, approximate model counting, which counts the number of satisfying assignments to within given tolerance and confidence level, was proposed as a practical alternative to exact model counting. Yet, approximate model counting has been studied essentially only theoretically. The only reported implementation of approximate model counting, due to Karp and Luby, worked only for DNF formulas. A few existing tools for CNF formulas are bounding model counters; they can handle realistic problem sizes, but fall short of providing counts within given tolerance and confidence, and, thus, are not approximate model counters.
We present here a novel algorithm, as well as a reference implementation, that is the first scalable approximate model counter for CNF formulas. The algorithm works by issuing a polynomial number of calls to a SAT solver. Our tool, ApproxMC, scales to formulas with tens of thousands of variables. Careful experimental comparisons show that ApproxMC reports, with high confidence, bounds that are close to the exact count, and also succeeds in reporting bounds with small tolerance and high confidence in cases that are too large for computing exact model counts.
Authors would like to thank Henry Kautz and Ashish Sabhrawal for their valuable help in experiments, and Tracy Volz for valuable comments on the earlier drafts. Work supported in part by NSF grants CNS 1049862 and CCF-1139011, by NSF Expeditions in Computing project “ExCAPE: Expeditions in Computer Augmented Program Engineering,” by BSF grant 9800096, by a gift from Intel, by a grant from Board of Research in Nuclear Sciences, India, and by the Shared University Grid at Rice funded by NSF under Grant EIA-0216467, and a partnership between Rice University, Sun Microsystems, and Sigma Solutions, Inc.
A longer version of this paper is available at http://www.cs.rice.edu/CS/ Verification/Projects/ApproxMC/
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
CryptoMiniSAT, http://www.msoos.org/cryptominisat2/
HotBits, http://www.fourmilab.ch/hotbits
Angluin, D.: On counting problems and the polynomial-time hierarchy. Theoretical Computer Science 12(2), 161–173 (1980)
Bacchus, F., Dalmao, S., Pitassi, T.: Algorithms and complexity results for #SAT and bayesian inference. In: Proc. of FOCS, pp. 340–351 (2004)
Bellare, M., Goldreich, O., Petrank, E.: Uniform generation of NP-witnesses using an NP-oracle. Information and Computation 163(2), 510–526 (1998)
Birnbaum, E., Lozinskii, E.L.: The good old Davis-Putnam procedure helps counting models. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 10(1), 457–477 (1999)
Chakraborty, S., Meel, K.S., Vardi, M.Y.: A scalable and nearly uniform generator of SAT witnesses. In: Sharygina, N., Veith, H. (eds.) CAV 2013. LNCS, vol. 8044, pp. 608–623. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Darwiche, A.: New advances in compiling CNF to decomposable negation normal form. In: Proc. of ECAI, pp. 328–332. Citeseer (2004)
Domshlak, C., Hoffmann, J.: Probabilistic planning via heuristic forward search and weighted model counting. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 30(1), 565–620 (2007)
Ermon, S., Gomes, C.P., Selman, B.: Uniform solution sampling using a constraint solver as an oracle. In: Proc. of UAI (2012)
Gogate, V., Dechter, R.: Samplesearch: Importance sampling in presence of determinism. Artificial Intelligence 175(2), 694–729 (2011)
Gomes, C.P., Sabharwal, A., Selman, B.: Model counting: A new strategy for obtaining good bounds. In: Proc. of AAAI, pp. 54–61 (2006)
Gomes, C.P., Sabharwal, A., Selman, B.: Model counting. In: Biere, A., Heule, M., Maaren, H.V., Walsh, T. (eds.) Handbook of Satisfiability. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 185, pp. 633–654. IOS Press (2009)
Gomes, C.P., Hoffmann, J., Sabharwal, A., Selman, B.: From sampling to model counting. In: Proc. of IJCAI, pp. 2293–2299 (2007)
Gomes, C.P., Sabharwal, A., Selman, B.: Near-uniform sampling of combinatorial spaces using XOR constraints. In: Proc. of NIPS, pp. 670–676 (2007)
Jerrum, M.R., Valiant, L.G., Vazirani, V.V.: Random generation of combinatorial structures from a uniform distribution. Theoretical Computer Science 43(2-3), 169–188 (1986)
Bayardo Jr., R.J., Schrag, R.: Using CSP look-back techniques to solve real-world SAT instances. In: Proc. of AAAI, pp. 203–208 (1997)
Karp, R.M., Luby, M., Madras, N.: Monte-Carlo approximation algorithms for enumeration problems. Journal of Algorithms 10(3), 429–448 (1989)
Kitchen, N., Kuehlmann, A.: Stimulus generation for constrained random simulation. In: Proc. of ICCAD, pp. 258–265 (2007)
Kroc, L., Sabharwal, A., Selman, B.: Leveraging belief propagation, backtrack search, and statistics for model counting. In: Trick, M.A. (ed.) CPAIOR 2008. LNCS, vol. 5015, pp. 127–141. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Löbbing, M., Wegener, I.: The number of knight’s tours equals 33,439,123,484,294 – counting with binary decision diagrams. The Electronic Journal of Combinatorics 3(1), R5 (1996)
Luby, M.G.: Monte-Carlo Methods for Estimating System Reliability. PhD thesis, EECS Department, University of California, Berkeley (June 1983)
Minato, S.: Zero-suppressed bdds for set manipulation in combinatorial problems. In: Proc. of Design Automation Conference, pp. 272–277 (1993)
Roth, D.: On the hardness of approximate reasoning. Artificial Intelligence 82(1), 273–302 (1996)
Rubinstein, R.: Stochastic enumeration method for counting np-hard problems. In: Methodology and Computing in Applied Probability, pp. 1–43 (2012)
Sang, T., Bacchus, F., Beame, P., Kautz, H., Pitassi, T.: Combining component caching and clause learning for effective model counting. In: Proc. of SAT (2004)
Sang, T., Bearne, P., Kautz, H.: Performing bayesian inference by weighted model counting. In: Prof. of AAAI, pp. 475–481 (2005)
Schmidt, J.P., Siegel, A., Srinivasan, A.: Chernoff-Hoeffding bounds for applications with limited independence. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 8, 223–250 (1995)
Simon, J.: On the difference between one and many. In: Salomaa, A., Steinby, M. (eds.) ICALP 1977. LNCS, vol. 52, pp. 480–491. Springer, Heidelberg (1977)
Sipser, M.: A complexity theoretic approach to randomness. In: Proc. of STOC, pp. 330–335 (1983)
Stockmeyer, L.: The complexity of approximate counting. In: Proc. of STOC, pp. 118–126 (1983)
Thurley, M.: sharpSAT – counting models with advanced component caching and implicit BCP. In: Biere, A., Gomes, C.P. (eds.) SAT 2006. LNCS, vol. 4121, pp. 424–429. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Toda, S.: On the computational power of PP and (+)P. In: Proc. of FOCS, pp. 514–519. IEEE (1989)
Trevisan, L.: Lecture notes on computational complexity. Notes written in Fall (2002), http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.71.9877&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Valiant, L.G.: The complexity of enumeration and reliability problems. SIAM Journal on Computing 8(3), 410–421 (1979)
Wei, W., Selman, B.: A new approach to model counting. In: Bacchus, F., Walsh, T. (eds.) SAT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3569, pp. 324–339. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Yuan, J., Aziz, A., Pixley, C., Albin, K.: Simplifying boolean constraint solving for random simulation-vector generation. IEEE Trans. on CAD of Integrated Circuits and Systems 23(3), 412–420 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Chakraborty, S., Meel, K.S., Vardi, M.Y. (2013). A Scalable Approximate Model Counter. In: Schulte, C. (eds) Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming. CP 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8124. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40627-0_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40627-0_18
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40626-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40627-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)