Formal Models for Digital Archives: NESTOR and the 5S

  • Nicola Ferro
  • Gianmaria Silvello
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8092)

Abstract

Archives are a valuable part of our cultural heritage but despite their importance, the models and technologies that have been developed over the past two decades in the DL field have not been specifically tailored to them. This is especially true when it comes to formal and foundational frameworks, as the 5S model is.

Therefore, we propose an innovative formal model, called NESTOR, for archives, explicitly built around the concepts of context and hierarchy which play a central role in the archival realm. We then use NESTOR to extend the 5S model offering the possibility of opening up the full wealth of DL methods to archives. We provide account for this by presenting two concrete applications.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bell, J., Lewis, S.: Using OAI-PMH and METS for exporting metadata and digital objects between repositories. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems 40(3), 268–276 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cook, T.: Archival Science and Postmodernism: New Formulations For Old Concepts. Archival Science 1(1), 3–24 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Discovery, E., Shaw, S., Reynolds, P.: Creating the Next Generation of Archival Finding Aids. D-Lib Magazine 13(5/6) (May/June 2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duranti, L.: The Archival Bond. Archives and Museum Informatics 11(3–4), 213–218 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ferro, N., Silvello, G.: Modeling Archives by means of OAI-ORE. In: Agosti, M., Esposito, F., Ferilli, S., Ferro, N. (eds.) IRCDL 2012. CCIS, vol. 354, pp. 216–227. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ferro, N., Silvello, G.: NESTOR: A Formal Model for Digital Archives. Information Processing & Management (in print, 2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2013.05.001
  7. 7.
    Fox, E.A., Gonçalves, M.A., Shen, R.: Theoretical Foundations for Digital Libraries: The 5S (Societies, Scenarios, Spaces, Structures, Streams) Approach. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, USA (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gilliland-Swetland, A.J.: Enduring Paradigm, New Opportunities: The Value of the Archival Perspective in the Digital Environment. Council on Library and Information Resources (2000)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gonçalves, M.A., Fox, E.A., Watson, L.T., Kipp, N.A.: Streams, Structures, Spaces, Scenarios, Societies (5S): A Formal Model for Digital Libraries. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 22(2), 270–312 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heath, T., Bizer, C.: Linked Data: Evolving the Web into a Global Data Space. In: Synthesis Lectures on the Semantic Web: Theory and Technology. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, USA (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    International Council on Archives. In: ISAD(G): General International Standard Archival Description, 2nd edn., International Council on Archives, Ottawa (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kaplan, D., Sauer, A., Wilczek, E.: Archival description in OAI-ORE. Journal of Digital Information 12(2) (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kozievitch, N.P., da S. Torres, R.: Describing OAI-ORE from the 5S Framework Perspective. In: Chowdhury, G., Koo, C., Hunter, J. (eds.) ICADL 2010. LNCS, vol. 6102, pp. 260–261. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lagoze, C., Van De Sompel, H., Nelson, M., Warner, S.: The Open Archives Initiative Protocol for Metadata Harvesting – Version 2.0 (December 2008), http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/openarchivesprotocol.html
  15. 15.
    University of California. California Digital Library. CDL Guidelines for Digital Objects. Version 2.0. Technical report, 34 pages (January 2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Prom, C.J., Habing, T.G.: Using the Open Archives Initiative Protocols with EAD. In: Hersh, W., Marchionini, G. (eds.) Proc. 2nd ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL 2002), pp. 171–180. ACM Press, New York (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ridener, J.: From Polders to Postmodernism: A Concise History of Archival Theory. Litwin Books (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ross, S.: Digital Preservation, Archival Science and Methodological Foundations for Digital Libraries. New Rev. Inf. Netw. 17(1), 43–68 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Society of American Archivists. Encoded Archival Description: Tag Library, ver. 2002. Society of American Archivists (2003), http://www.loc.gov/ead/tglib/
  20. 20.
    Van de Sompel, H., Lagoze, C.: Interoperability for the Discovery, Use, and Re-Use of Units of Scholarly Communication. CTWatch Quarterly 3(3) (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yako, S.: It Complicated: Barriers to EAD Implementation. American Archivist 71(2), 456–475 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicola Ferro
    • 1
  • Gianmaria Silvello
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Information EngineeringUniversity of PaduaItaly

Personalised recommendations