WATTSBurning: Design and Evaluation of an Innovative Eco-Feedback System

  • Filipe Quintal
  • Lucas Pereira
  • Nuno Nunes
  • Valentina Nisi
  • Mary Barreto
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8117)

Abstract

This paper reports a 15 weeks study of artistic eco-feedback deployed in six houses with an innovative sensing infrastructure and visualization strategy. The paper builds on previous work that showed a significant decrease in user awareness after a short period with a relapse in consumption. In this study we aimed to investigate if new forms of feedback could overcome this issue, maintaining the users awareness for longer periods of time. The study presented here aims at understanding if people are more aware of their energy consumption after the installation of a new, art inspired eco-feedback. The research question was then: does artistic eco-feedback provide an increased awareness over normal informative feedback? And does that awareness last longer? To answer this questions participants were interviewed and their consumption patterns analyzed. The main contribution of the paper is to advance our knowledge about the effectiveness of eco-feedback and provide guidelines for implementation of novel eco-feedback visualizations that overcome the relapse behavior pattern.

Keywords

Sustainability Aesthetics Eco-feedback User Interfaces Prototyping 

References

  1. 1.
    Wilson, A., Yost, P.: Buildings and the environment: the numbers. Environmental Building News 10 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    European Environment Agency, http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/figures/final-energy-consumption-by-sector-5 (retrieved on January 2013)
  3. 3.
    Schipper, L.: Linking lifestyle and energy used: a matter of time? Annual Review of Energy 14, 273–320 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Froehlich, J., Findlater, L., Landay, J.: The Design of Eco-Feedback Technology. In: CHI 2010, Atlanta. ACM (2010)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Mankoff, J., et al.: Leveraging Social Networks To Motivate Individuals to Reduce their Ecological Footprints. In: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2007, p. 87. IEEE Computer Society (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mills, E.: Review and comparison of web- and disk-based tools for residential energy analysis. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, LBNL (2002)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yolande, A.: Designing eco-feedback systems for everyday life. In: 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2135–2144. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mills, E.: Review and comparison of web- and disk-based tools for residential energy analysis. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, LBNL (2002)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Consolvo, S., Everitt, K., Smith, I., Landay, J.A.: Design Requirements for Technologies that Encourage Physical Activity. In: CHI 2006, Montreal, pp. 457–466 (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pierce, J., Odom, W., Blevis, E.: Energy Aware Dweling: a critical survey for interaction design for eco-visualizations. In: OZCHI 2008. ACM Press, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Egan, C.: How customers interpret and use comparative displays of their home energy use. In: Proc. European Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Panel III, 19 (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dunlap, R.E.: Lay Perceptions of Global Risk. International Sociology 13(4), 473–498 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fischer, C.: Feedback on household electricity consumption: a tool for saving energy? Energy Efficiency 1, 79–104 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Consolvo, S., McDonald, D.W., Landay, J.A.: Theory-driven design strategies for technologies that support behaviour change in everyday life. In: CHI 2009, New York, NY, USA, pp. 405–414 (2009)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Holmes, T.G.: Eco-visualization: combining art and technology to reduce energy consumption. In: Proc. of the 6th ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity & Cognition, pp. 153–162. ACM Press (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Nuage Vert Nuage Vert Project (2008), http://www.pixelache.ac/nuage-blog/ (retrieved July 3, 2008)
  17. 17.
    Peschiera, G., Taylor, J.E., Siegel, J.A.: Response– relapse patterns of building ccupant electricity consumption following exposure to personal, contextualized and occupant peer network utilization data. Energy and Buildings 42, 1329–1336 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nunes, N., Pereira, L., Quintal, F., Berges, M.: Deploying and evaluating the effectiveness of energy eco-feedback through a low-cost NILM solution. In: Proc. The 6th International Conference on Persuasive Technology (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Pereira, L., Quintal, F., Barreto, M., Nunes, N.: Understanding the Limitations of Eco-feedback: A One Year Long-term Study. To appear at 1st SouthCHI (2013)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nisi, V., Nicoletti, D., Nisi, R., Nunes, N.: Beyond eco-feedback: using art and emotional attachment to express energy consumption. In: Proceedings of C&C, pp. 381–382. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pereira, L., Quintal, F., Nunes, N.J., Berges, M.: The Design of a Hardware-software Platform for Long-term Energy Eco-feedback Research. In: Proceedings of The ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Barreto, M., Karapanos, E., Nunes, N.: Social Translucence as a theoretical framework for sustainable HCI. In: Campos, P., Graham, N., Jorge, J., Nunes, N., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2011, Part IV. LNCS, vol. 6949, pp. 195–203. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Petersen, M.G., et al.: Aesthetic interaction: a pragmatist’s aesthetics of interactive systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques, pp. 269–276. ACM, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    He, H.A., Greenberg, S., Huang, M.E.: One size does not fit all: applying the Transtheoretical Model to Energy Feedback Technology Design. In: CHI 2010: Sense and Sustainability, pp. 927–936. ACM Press (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Filipe Quintal
    • 1
  • Lucas Pereira
    • 1
  • Nuno Nunes
    • 1
  • Valentina Nisi
    • 1
  • Mary Barreto
    • 1
  1. 1.Madeira Interactive Technologies InstituteUniversity of MadeiraFunchalPortugal

Personalised recommendations