Advertisement

Considering Communities, Diversity and the Production of Locality in the Design of Networked Urban Screens

  • Wallis Motta
  • Ava Fatah gen Schieck
  • Holger Schnädelbach
  • Efstathia Kostopoulou
  • Moritz Behrens
  • Steve North
  • Lei Ye
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8117)

Abstract

Highly diverse settings such as London (with people from ~179 countries speaking ~300 languages) are unique in that ethnic or socio-cultural backgrounds are no longer sufficient to generate a sense of place, belonging and community. Instead, residents actively perform place building activities on an ongoing basis, which we believe is of great importance when deploying interactive situated technologies in public spaces.

This paper investigates community and place building within a complex multicultural context. We approached this using ethnography, complemented with workshops in the wild. By studying the relationships arising between different segments of the community and two networked screen nodes, we examine the place building activities of residents, and how screen nodes are incorporated into them. Our research suggests that urban screens will be framed (and eventually used) as part of this continuing process of social, spatial and cultural construction. This highlights the importance of enabling socially meaningful relations between the people mediated by these technologies.

Keywords

Diversity communities ethnography workshops in the wild urban screens 

References

  1. 1.
    Appadurai, A.: Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minnesota Press, USA (1996)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Behrens, M., et al.: Exploring the Effect of Spatial Layout on Mediated Urban Interactions. In: Proc. of the ACM Int. Symp. On Pervasive Displays, PerDis (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Belk, R.W.: Possessions and the extended self. Jrnl. of Consumer Res., 139–168 (1988)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dant, T., Deacon, A.: Hostels to homes: The rehousing of single homeless people. Avebury/Gower, Aldershot (1989)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dourish, P.: Re-space-ing place: ’place’ and ’space’ ten years on. In: Proc. of CSCW, November 4-8 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gen, F., Schieck, A., et al.: Research in the Wild: Exploring the potential of Networked Urban Screens for Communities and Culture. In: DIS Workshop: Research in the Wild, Newcastle, UK (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Giddens, A.: The Construction of Society. Polity, Cambridge (1984)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Greenfield, P.: A Theory of the Teacher in the Learning Activities of Everyday Life. In Everyday Cognition, pp. 117–138. Harvard University Press (1984)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kapchan, D.: Performance. Journal of American Folklore 108, 479 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Memarovic, N., et al.: Using public displays to stimulate passive engagement, active engagement, and discovery in public spaces. In: Proc. of MAB (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Miller, D.: Tales from Facebook. Polity (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    North, S., et al.: Tension Space Analysis: Exploring Community Requirements for Networked Urban Screens. In: Proceedings of IFIP INTERACT. LNCS. Springer (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    O’Hara, K., et al.: Understanding collective play in an urban screen game. . In: Proc. CSCW 2008, San Diego, CA, USA (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Redhead, F., et al.: NNUB: the neighbourhood nub digital noticeboard system. In: Proc. of ACM OzCHI, pp. 418–419 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Peltonen, P., et al.: It’s Mine, Don’t Touch!: interactions at a large multi-touch display in a city centre. In: Proc. of ACM SIGGHI (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Satchell, C., et al.: Suburban nostalgia: the community building potential of urban screens. In: Proc. of ACM OzCHI (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Taylor, K.: Programming video art for urban screens in public space. First Monday, Special Issue #4: Urban Screens (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Taylor, N., et al.: Social interaction around a rural community photo display. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 67(12), 1037–1047 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Vertovec, S.: Towards post-multiculturalism? Changing communities, conditions and contexts of diversity. International Social Science Journal 61(199), 83–95 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Warnier, J.P.: A praxeological approach to subjectivation in a material world. Journal of Material Culture 6(1), 5–24 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Williams, R.: The Long Revolution. Pelican, Harmondsworth (1961, 1984)Google Scholar
  22. 22.

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wallis Motta
    • 1
  • Ava Fatah gen Schieck
    • 1
  • Holger Schnädelbach
    • 2
  • Efstathia Kostopoulou
    • 1
  • Moritz Behrens
    • 1
  • Steve North
    • 2
  • Lei Ye
    • 2
  1. 1.The BartlettUniversity College LondonUK
  2. 2.Mixed Reality Laboratory (MRL)University of NottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations