Do Usability Professionals Think about User Experience in the Same Way as Users and Developers Do?
In this paper, we study how usability professionals’ thinking about system use relates to that of system developers and end users. We conducted 72 repertory-grid interviews to capture how usability professionals, developers, and users describe their system use. The participants in each stakeholder group were from China, Denmark, and India. Our results indicate that usability professionals focus on emotion-related aspects of system use, while users focus more on context in terms of utility and degree of usage. There are no interactions between stakeholder group and nationality, although both stakeholder group and nationality independently influence how participants think about usability and user experience. We recommend that to understand users’ concerns, researchers should study context more.
KeywordsUsability professionals UX professionals user experience stakeholder differences cultural differences
- 1.Bødker, S.: Through the Interface: A Human Activity Approach to User Interface Design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hills dale (1990)Google Scholar
- 2.Dray, S.M.: Engaged Scholars, Thoughtful Practitioners: The Interdependence of Academics and Practitioners in User-Centered Design and Usability. Journal of Usability Studies 5(1), 1–7 (2009)Google Scholar
- 3.Dumas, J.: The Great Leap Forward: The Birth of the Usability Profession (1988-1993). Journal of Usability Studies 2(2), 54–60 (2007)Google Scholar
- 7.Hassenzahl, M., Wessler, R.: Capturing Design Space from a User Perspective: The Repertory Grid Technique Revisited. In: International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 441–459 (2000)Google Scholar
- 8.Hertzum, M., Clemmensen, T.: How Do Usability Professionals Construe Usability? International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 70(1), 26–42 (2012)Google Scholar
- 9.Hertzum, M., Clemmensen, T., Hornbæk, K., Kumar, J., Shi, Q., Yammiyavar, P.: Personal Usability Constructs: How People Construe Usability across Nationalities and Stakeholder Groups. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 27(8), 729–761 (2011)Google Scholar
- 10.ISO 9241-210: Ergonomics of Human System Interaction-Part 210: Human-Centred Design for Interactive Systems (Formerly Known as 13407). International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Geneva, Switzerland (2009)Google Scholar
- 11.Kelly, G.A.: The Psychology of Personal Constructs. Theory and Personality, vol. 1. Norton, New York (1955)Google Scholar
- 13.Lazar, J., Feng, J.H., Hochheiser, H.: Research Methods in Human-Computer Interaction. Wiley, Chichester (2010)Google Scholar
- 18.Redish, G., Barnum, C.: Overlap, Influence, Intertwining: The Interplay of UX and Technical Communication. Journal of Usability Studies 6(3), 90–101 (2011)Google Scholar
- 22.Walsh, T., Nurkka, P., Walsh, R.: Cultural Differences in Smartphone User Experience Evaluation. In: MUM 2010, Limassol, Cyprus, (Article No. 24). ACM, New York (2010)Google Scholar