A Dog Tail for Utility Robots: Exploring Affective Properties of Tail Movement

  • Ashish Singh
  • James E. Young
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8118)

Abstract

We present a dog-tail interface for utility robots, as a means of communicating high-level robotic state through affect. This interface leverages people’s general knowledge of dogs and their tails (e.g., wagging means happy) to communicate robotic state in an easy to understand way. In this paper, we present the details of our tail construction, and the results of a study which explored a base case of people’s reactions to the tail: how various parameters of tail movements and configuration influence perception of the robot’s zoomorphized affective state. Our study indicated that people were able to interpret a range of affective states from various tail configurations and gestures, and in summary, we present a set of guidelines for mapping tail parameters to intended perceived affective robotic state.

Keywords

human-robot interaction animal-inspired interfaces affective computing 

References

  1. 1.
    Breazeal, C.: Emotion and Sociable Humanoid Robots. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59(1-2), 119–155 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Breazeal, C., Hoffman, G., Lockerd, A.: Teaching and Working with Robots as a Collaboration. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - AAMAS 2004, pp. 1030–1037 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Van Breemen, A., Yan, X., Meerbeek, B.: iCat. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - AAMAS 2005, p. 143 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Brown, S.E.: Self Psychology and the Human–Animal Bond: An Overview. The Human-Animal Bond and Self Psychology: Toward a New Understanding 12(1), 67–86 (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chang, A., Resner, B., Koerner, B., Wang, X.: Ishii. H.: LumiTouch. In: Proceedings of the International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2001, p. 313 (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Duffy, B.R.: Anthropomorphism and the Social Robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42(3-4), 177–190 (2003)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Forlizzi, J., DiSalvo, C.: Service Robots in the Domestic Environment. In: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - HRI 2006, p. 258 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Friedman, B., Kahn, P., Hagman, J.: Hardware companions?: What Online AIBO Discussion Forums Reveal About the Human-Robotic Relationship. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2003, p. 273 (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Galac, S., Knol, B.W.: Fear-Motivated Aggression in Dogs: Patient Characteristics, Diagnosis and Therapy. Animal Welfare 6(1), 9–15 (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hamill, L., Harper, R.: Talking Intelligence: a Historical and Conceptual Exploration of Speech-Based Human-Machine Interaction in Smart Homes. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Intelligent Environments, pp. 121–128 (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hyunsoo, S., Young-Min, K., Jong-Chan, P., Chong, H.K., Dong-Soo, K.: Design of a Robot Head for Emotional Expression: EEEX. In: International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication. RO-MAN, pp. 207–212 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kang, S., Jaehong, K., Joochan, S.: A Robot Platform for Children and Its Action Control. In: International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems, pp. 2095–2098 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kleiman, D.G.: Social Behavior of the Maned Wolf (Chrysocyon brachyurus) and Bush Dog (Speothos venaticus): A Study in Contrast. Journal of Mammalogy 53(4), 791–806 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kriglstein, S., Wallner, G.: HOMIE. In: Proceedings of the International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI 2005, p. 2094 (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lang, P., Bradley, B., Cuthbert, B.: International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective Ratings of Pictures and Instruction Manual. Technical Report A-8 (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lee, M.K., Makatchev, M.: How do People Talk with a Robot. In: Proceedings of the International Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI EA 2009. p. 3769 (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mehrabian, A.: Pleasure-Arousal-Dominance: A General Framework for Describing and Measuring Individual Differences in Temperament. Current Psychology 14(4), 261–292 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Michalowski, M.P., Šabanović, S., DiSalvo, C., Busquets, D., Hiatt, L.M., Melchior, N.A., Simmons, R.: Socially Distributed Perception: GRACE plays social tag at AAAI 2005. Autonomous Robots 22(4), 385–397 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Morris, J.D.: Observations: SAM: The Self-Assessment Manikin an Efficient Cross-Cultural Measurement of Emotional Response. Journal of Advertising Research 0021-8499, 63–68 (1995)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Norman, D.A.: Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Picard, R.W.: Affective computing. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pollick, F.E., Paterson, H.M., Bruderlin, A., Sanford, A.J.: Perceiving Affect from Arm Movement. Cognition 82(2), B51–B61 (2001)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Reeder, S., Kelly, L., Kechavarzi, B., Šabanović, S.: Breakbot. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems - DIS 2010, p. 61 (2010)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Russell, J.A.: A Circumplex Model of Affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39(6), 1161–1178 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Saerbeck, M., Bartneck, C.: Perception of Affect Elicited by Robot Motion. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - HRI 2010, pp. 53–60 (2010)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schreiner, K.: Retail Robots on the Move. Intelligent Systems 16(2), 4–7 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shibata, T., Yoshida, M., Yamato, J.: Artificial Emotional Creature for Human-Machine Interaction. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Computational Cybernetics and Simulation, vol. 3, pp. 2269–2274 (1997)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Singh, A., Young, J.E.: Animal-Inspired Human-Robot Interaction: A Robotic Tail for Communicating State. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - HRI 2012, pp. 237–238 (2012)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Staudte, M., Crocker, M.W.: The Utility of Gaze in Human-Robot Interaction. Metrics for Human-Robot Interaction (2008)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
  31. 31.
    Young, J.E., Sung, J., Voida, A., Sharlin, E., Igarashi, T., Christensen, H.I., Grinter, R.E.: Evaluating Human-Robot Interaction. International Journal of Social Robotics 3(1), 53–67 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Young, J.E., Xin, E., Sharlin, E.: Robot Expressionism Through Cartooning. In: Proceedings of the ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction - HRI 2007, p. 309 (2007)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Young, J.E., Hawkins, E., Sharlin, E., Igarashi, T.: Toward Acceptable Domestic Robots: Applying Insights from Social Psychology. International Journal of Social Robotics 1(1), 95–108 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Young, J.E., Kamiyama, Y., Reichenbach, J., Igarashi, T., Sharlin, E.: How to Walk a Robot: A Dog-Leash Human-Robot Interface. In: International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN, pp. 376–382 (2011)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Zecca, M., Endo, N., Momoki, S., Itoh, K., Takanishi, A.: Design of the Humanoid Robot KOBIAN - Preliminary Analysis of Facial and Whole Body Emotion Expression capabilities. In: International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp. 487–492 (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ashish Singh
    • 1
  • James E. Young
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations