Advertisement

Who Would Pay for Facebook? Self Esteem as a Predictor of User Behavior, Identity Construction and Valuation of Virtual Possessions

  • Jiaqi Nie
  • S. Shyam Sundar
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8119)

Abstract

Self-presentation is a major preoccupation in Facebook. Users carefully construct their online profile and assiduously edit postings on their wall in order to strategically shape their online persona. This study examines some psychological antecedents and consequences of such actions. In particular, we propose that users’ self-esteem affects their sense of agency and self-monitoring tendencies, with the former leading to a fuller description of their profile and the latter contributing to more frequent customization of their wall. In turn, these behaviors are hypothesized to contribute to users’ personal and social identity respectively, en route to affecting their valuation of Facebook as a virtual possession. Structural equation modeling analysis of survey data (N=221) largely supports this model and reveals that the personal identity reflected in one’s Facebook account is a major predictor of the degree to which one values it as a possession. We discuss the implications of “I” vs. “Me” in self-esteem with regard to virtual possessions in social networking environments.

Keywords

self-esteem Facebook activity online identity construction virtual possession survey quantitative methods structural equation modeling (SEM) 

References

  1. 1.
    Greenhow, C., Robelia, B.: Informal Learning and Identity Formation in Online Social Networks. Learning Media And Technology 34, 119–140 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sundar, S.S.: Self as Source: Agency and Customization in Interactive Media. In: Konijn, E.A., Sonja, U., Martin, T. (eds.) Mediated Interpersonal Communication, pp. 58–74. Routledge, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Turkle, S.: Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. Simon & Schuster, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Turkle, S.: The Second Self: Computers and the Human Spirit. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1985)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Odom, W., Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J.: Virtual possessions. In: Proc. of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, pp. 368–371. ACM, New York (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mead, G.H.: Mind, self, and society: From the Standpoint of a Social Behaviorist. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kolb, W.L.: A Critical Evaluation of Mead’s “I” and “Me” Concepts. Social Forces 22(3), 291–296 (1944)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pelham, B.W., Swann, W.B.: From Self-conceptions to Self-worth: on the Sources and Structure of Global Self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57, 672–680 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Crocker, J., Wolfe, C.T.: Contingencies of Self-worth. Psychological Review 108, 593–623 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Campbell, J.D., Trapnell, P.D., Heine, S.J., Katz, I.M., Lavallee, L.F., Lehman, D.R.: Self-concept Clarity: Measurement, Personality Correlates, and Cultural Boundaries. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70(1), 141–156 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baumeister, R.F., Campbell, J.D., Krueger, J.I., Vohs, K.D.: Does High Self-Esteem Cause Better Performance, Interpersonal Success, Happiness, or Healthier Lifestyles? Psychological Science in the Public Interest 4, 1–44 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bem, D.J.: Self-perception Theory. In: Berkowitz, L. (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, pp. 1–62. Academic Press (1972)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tice, D.M.: Self-concept Change and Self-presentation: the Looking Glass Self is also a Magnifying Glass. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63, 435–451 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Judge, T.A., Erez, A., Bono, J.E., Thoresen, C.J.: Are Measures of Self-esteem, Neuroticism, Locus of Control, and Generalized Self-efficacy Indicators of a Common Core Construct? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83, 693–710 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gallagher, I.: Philosophical Conceptions of the Self: Implications for Cognitive Science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4, 14–21 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zarghooni, S.: A Study of Self-Presentation in Light of Facebook. Institute of Psychology, University of Oslo (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Steinfield, C., Ellison, N.B., Lampe, C.: Social Capital, Self-esteem, and Use of Online Social Network Sites: a Longitudinal Analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 29, 434–445 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Manis, J.G., Meltzer, B.N.: Symbolic Interaction: a Reader in Social Psychology, 3rd edn. Allyn and Bacon, Inc., Boston (1978)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Goffman, E.: The Presentation of Self to Others. In: Manis, J.G., Meltzer, B.N. (eds.) Symbolic Interaction: A Reader in Social Psychology, pp. 171–178. Allyn and Bacon, Inc., Boston (1978)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ellison, N.: Facebook Use on Campus: A Social Capital Perspective on Social Network Sites. In: ECAR Symposium, Boca Raton, FL (2007)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gonzales, A.L., Hancock, J.T.: Mirror, Mirror on My Facebook Wall: Effects of Exposure to Facebook on Self-esteem. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 14, 79–83 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Bong, M., Clark, R.: Comparison between Self-concept and Self-efficacy in Academic Motivation Research. Educational Psychologist 34, 139–153 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Byrne, B.M.: The General/Academic Self-concept Nomological Network: A Review of Construct Validation Research. Review of Educational Research 54, 427–456 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Reynolds, K.J., Turner, J.C., Branscombe, N.R.: Interactionism in Personality and Social Psychology: An Integrated Approach to Understanding the Mind and Behaviour. European Journal of Personality 482, 458–482 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gecas, V., Burke, P.J.: Self and Identity. Social Psychology: Sociological Perspectives on Social Psychology, pp. 41–67 (1995)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hogg, M.A., Reid, S.A.: Social Identity, Self-Categorization, and the Communication of Group Norms. Communication Theory 16, 7–30 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    DiMicco, J.M., Millen, D.R.: Identity Management: Multiple Presentations of Self in Facebook. In: The 2007 International ACM Conference on Supporting Group Work, pp. 383–386. ACM Press, New York (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C., Lampe, C.: The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 12(4), 1143–1168 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Turkle, S.: Alone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each Other. Basic Books (AZ), New York (2012)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Odom, W., Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J.: Teenagers and their Virtual Possessions: Design Opportunities and Issues. In: Proc. of the 2011 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2011), pp. 1491–1500. ACM, New York (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M., Halton, E.: The Meaning of Things: Domestic Symbols and the Self. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Kleine, S.S., Baker, S.M.: An Integrative Review of Material Possession Attachment. Academy of Marketing Science Review 1(1), 1–39 (2004)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Belk, R.W.: Possessions and the Extended Self. Journal of Consumer Research 15(2), 139–168 (1988)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Rosenberg, M.: Society and the Adolescent Self-image, revised edn. Wesleyan University Press, Middletown CT (1989)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kim, Y., Sundar, S.S.: Can Your Avatar Improve Your Health? The Impact of Avatar Attractiveness and Avatar Creation. In: Proc. of the 61st Annual Conference of the International Communication Association, Boston, MA (2011)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Berinsky, A.J.: Can We Talk? Self-Presentation and the Survey Response. Political Psychology 25(4), 643–659 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Briggs, S.R., Cheek, J.M., Buss, A.H.: An Analysis of the Self-monitoring Scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38, 679–686 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ball, A.D., Tasaki, L.H.: The Role and Measurement of Attachment in Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology 1, 155–172 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ferraro, R., Escalas, J.E., Bettman, J.R.: Our Possessions, Our Selves: Domains of Self-worth and the Possession–self Link. Journal of Consumer Psychology 21, 169–177 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Bentler, P.M.: Comparative Fit Indexes in Structural Models. Psychological Bulletin 107, 238–246 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kline, R.B.: Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. The Guilford Press (2010)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Bollen, K.A.: Structural Equation Models. In: Armitage, P., Colton, T. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Biostatistics, vol. 7, pp. 4363–4372. Wiley Online Library, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Lee, S.: Psychological Effects of Culture on Aesthetic Motivation for Cosmetic Customization of Mobile Phones. PhD dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University (2011)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Snyder, M., Copeland, J., Giacalone, R.A., Rosenfeld, P.: Self-monitoring Processes in Organizational Settings. In: Giacalone, R.A., Rosenfeld, P. (eds.) Impression Management in the Organization, pp. 7–19. Erlbaum (1989)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Orehovački, T.: Development of a Methodology for Evaluating the Quality in Use of Web 2.0 Applications. In: Campos, P., Graham, N., Jorge, J., Nunes, N., Palanque, P., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2011, Part IV. LNCS, vol. 6949, pp. 382–385. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Bargh, J.A., McKenna, K.Y.A.: The Internet and Social Life. Annual Review of Psychology 55, 573–590 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jiaqi Nie
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. Shyam Sundar
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Keio-NUS CUTE Center, Interactive & Digital Media InstituteNational University of SingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.Department of Interaction ScienceSungkyunkwan UniversitySeoulKorea
  3. 3.Media Effects Research LaboratoryPenn State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Personalised recommendations