Advertisement

Using Narrative Research and Portraiture to Inform Design Research

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8119)

Abstract

Employing an interdisciplinary perspective, this paper addresses how narrative research and portraiture - methods originating from, and commonly used in social sciences - can be beneficial for HCI and design research communities. Narrative research takes stories as a basis for data collection and analysis, while portraiture can be used to create written narratives about interview participants. Drawing on this knowledge, we show how a focus on narrative data, and analysis of such data through portraiture, can be adopted for the specific purpose of enhancing design processes. We hope to encourage design and HCI researchers to consider adopting these methods. By drawing on an illustrative example, we show how these methods served to inform design ideas for digital crafting. Based on our experiences, we present guidelines for using narrative research and portraiture for design research, as well as discussing opportunities and strengths, and limitations and risks.

Keywords

Qualitative research methods narratives story-telling narrative research portraiture design research interaction design craft 
Download to read the full conference paper text

References

  1. 1.
    Dourish, P.: Implications for design. In: Proc. CHI 2006, pp. 541–550. ACM Press (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S., DiSalvo, C., Gaver, W., Sengers, P.: The humanities and/in HCI. In: Ext. Abstracts CHI 2012. ACM Press (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bruner, J.: Life as a narrative. Social Research 54(1), 11–32 (1987)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hollway, W., Jefferson, T.: Doing qualitative research differently. SAGE, London (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sinclair Bell, J.: Narrative Inquiry: More than just telling stories. TESOL Quarterly 36(2), 207–213 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Williams, G.: The genesis of chronic illness: narrative re-construction. Sociology of Health and Illness 6(2), 175–200 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Presser, L.: Collecting and analyzing the stories of offenders. Journal of Criminal Justice Education 21(4), 431–446 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Van Maanen, J.: Tales of the field: on writing ethnography, 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, Bristol. University Presses Marketing, Chicago, Ill (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bhömer, M.T., Helmes, J., O’Hara, K., Hoven, E.V.D.: 4Photos: a collaborative photo sharing experience. In: Proc. NordiCHI 2010. ACM Press (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cao, X., Lindley, S.E., Helmes, J., Sellen, A.: Telling the whole story: anticipation, inspiration and reputation in a field deployment of TellTable. In: Proc. CSCW 2010. ACM Press (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Golsteijn, C., den Hoven, E.: Facilitating parent-teenager communication through interactive photo cubes. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 17(2), 273–286 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Clarke, R., Wright, P., McCarthy, J.: Sharing narrative and experience: digital stories and portraits at a women’s centre. In: Ext. Abstract CHI 2012. ACM Press (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    McCarthy, J., Wright, P.: Technology as experience. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wright, P.C., McCarthy, J.C.: Experience-centered design: designers, users, and communities in dialogue. Synthesis lectures on human-centered informatics. Morgan & Claypool Publishers, San Rafael (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jung, H., Bardzell, S., Blevis, E., Pierce, J., Stolterman, E.: How Deep Is Your Love: Deep Narratives of Ensoulment and Heirloom Status. International Journal of Design 5(1), 59–71 (2011)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Blythe, M., Monk, A., Park, J.: Technology biographies: field study techinques for home use product development. In: Ext. Abstracts CHI 2002. ACM Press (2002)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wixon, D., Holtzblatt, K., Knox, S.: Contextual design: an emergent view of system design. In: Proc. CHI 1990. ACM (1990)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Millen, D.R.: Rapid ethnography: time deepening strategies for HCI field research. In: Proc. DIS 2000, pp. 280–286. ACM Press (2000)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lawrence-Lightfoot, S.: Reflections on portraiture: a dialogue between art and science. Qualitative Inquiry 11(1), 3–15 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Riessman, C.K.: Narrative methods for the human sciences. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Lawrence-Lightfoot, S., Davis, J.H.: The art and science of portraiture. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1997)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chapman, T.K.: Expressions of ‘voice’ in portraiture. Qualitative Inquiry 11(1), 27–51 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Davis, J.H.: Balancing the whole: Portraiture as methodology, in Qualitative research as psychology: Expanding perspectives in methodology and design. In: Camic, P.M., Rhodes, J.E., Yardley, L. (eds.), pp. 199–217. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC (2003)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wright, P., McCarthy, J.: Empathy and experience in HCI. In: Proc. CHI 2008. ACM Press (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Orr, J.E.: Talking about machines: an ethnography of a modern job. Collection on technology and work. ILR Press, Ithaca (1996)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nielsen, L.: From user to character: an investigation into user-descriptions in scenarios. In: Proc. DIS 2002. ACM Press (2002)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cooper, A.: The inmates are running the asylum. Sams, Indianapolis (1999)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Blythe, M.: Pastiche scenarios. Interactions 11(5), 51–53 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Djajadiningrat, J.P., Gaver, W.W., Frens, J.W.: Interaction relabelling and extreme characters: methods for exploring aesthetic interactions. In: Proc. DIS 2000. ACM Press (2000)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Triantafyllakos, G., Palaigeorgiou, G., Tsoukalas, I.A.: Design alter egos: constructing and employing fictional characters in collaborative design sessions. In: Proc. BCS HCI 2009. British Computer Society (2009)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Blomquist, Ǻ, Arvola, M.: Personas in action: ethnography in an interaction design team. In: Proc. NordiCHI 2002. ACM Press (2002)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chang, Y.-N., Lim, Y.-K., Stolterman, E.: Personas: from theory to practices. In: Proc. NordiCHI 2008. ACM Press (2008)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Csikszentmihalyi, M.: Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. Harper, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Gauntlett, D.: Making is connecting: the social meaning of creativity from DIY and knitting to YouTube and Web 2.0. Polity Press, Cambridge (2011)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sennett, R.: The craftsman. Yale University Press, New Haven (2008)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Harling Stalker, L.L.: A tale of two narratives: Ontological and epistemological narratives. Narrative Inquiry 19(2), 219–232 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Hackmann, D.G.: Using portraiture in educational leadership research. International Journal of Leadership in Education: Theory and Practice 5(1), 51–60 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hill, D.A.: The poetry in portraiture: Seeing subjects, hearing voices, and feeling contexts. Qualitative Inquiry 11(1), 95–105 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Elliot, J.: Using narrative in social Research: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Sage Publications, London (2005)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Cotterill, P., Letherby, G.: Weaving Stories: personal auto/biographies in feminist research. Sociology 27(14), 227–237 (1993)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Smythe, W.E., Murray, M.J.: Owning the story: Ethical considerations in narrative research. Ethics and Behavior 10(4), 311–336 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Atkinson, P., Delamont, S.: Rescuing narrative from qualitative research. Narrative Inquiry 16(1), 164–172 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Digital World Research CentreUniversity of SurreyGuildfordUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.Department of Industrial DesignEindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Institute of CriminologyUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations

Cite paper