Advertisement

Idiosyncratic Behavior of Globally Distributed Manufacturing

  • Stanislaw Strzelczak
Conference paper
  • 3k Downloads
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 398)

Abstract

The paper presents results of empirical research, which explores systemic background of increasing turbulences and disruptions within globally distributed manufacturing networks. Among the identified factors three have biggest impact: (1) the level of completeness and connectivity of the networks, i.e. topological characteristics of the manufacturing network (2) the herd behavior of clients and decision makers, which enhances or tames the demand due to occasional asymmetry of their perception of the demand (3) the diversity of operational environments within the network, which itself may be a dominant factor of turbulences or even disruptions of the operational processes. It means that in some circumstances, the internal resources of companies may have limited value as a countermeasure against the unlikely effects of turbulences and disruptions. The research has also identified some other factors of idiosyncratic behavior of globally distributed manufacturing, which are rooted in some particular operational policies.

Keywords

Supply Chain Bullwhip Effect Herd Behavior Manufacturing Network Process Phase Transition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Bhattacharya, R., Bandyopadhyay, S.: A review of the causes of bullwhip effect in a supply chain. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 54(9-12), 1245–1261 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G., Rabin, M. (eds.): Advances in behavioral economics, pp. 689–723. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chopra, S., Sodhi, M.S.: Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. Sloan Management Review 46(1), 53–62 (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Christopher, M., Holweg, M.: “Supply Chain 2.0”: managing supply chains in the era of turbulence. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management 41(1), 63–82 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Croson, R., Donohue, K.: Behavioral causes of the bullwhip effect and the observed value of inventory information. Management Science 52(3), 323–336 (2006)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dowell, A.: Effects of Triple Disaster Will Reverberate for Months. The Wall Street Journal (March 28, 2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Emery, F.E., Trist, E.L.: The causal texture of organizational environments. Human Relations 18(1), 21–32 (1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fransoo, J., Wouters, M.: Measuring the bullwhip effect in the supply chain. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 5 5(2), 78–89 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jüttner, U.: Supply chain risk management. Understanding the business requirements from a practitioner perspective. International Journal of Logistics Management 16(1), 120–141 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kleindorfer, P.R., Saad, G.H.: Managing disruption risks in supply chains. Production and Operations Management 14(1), 53–68 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pfohl, H.-C., Köhler, H., Thomas, D.: State of the art in supply chain risk management research: empirical and conceptual findings and a roadmap for the implementation in practice. Logistics Research 2(1), 33–44 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schäfer, D.: Lack of parts hits VW production. Financial Times (January 20, 2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sterman, J.D.: Misperceptions of feedback in dynamic decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 43(3), 301–335 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sterman, J.D.: Business dynamics. McGraw-Hill (2000)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Strzelczak, S.: Reducing turbulences in industrial supply chains. In: Koch, T. (ed.) Learn Business System and Beyond. LNBIP, vol. 257, pp. 393–402. Springer, Boston (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wagner, S.M., Bode, C.: An empirical investigation of supply chain performance along several dimensions of risk. Journal of Business Logistics 29(1), 307–325 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stanislaw Strzelczak
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Production EngineeringWarsaw University of TechnologyWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations