Evaluation and Calculation of Dynamics in Environmental Impact Assessment

Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 397)


In ten years customers will select products not only based on price and quality but also with strong regard to the product value environmental footprint, including for example the energy consumed. Customers expect transparency in the product realization process, where most products are labeled with their environmental footprint. Vigorous companies see this new product value as an opportunity to be more competitive. In order to effectively label the environmental impact of a product, it is pertinent for companies to request the environmental footprint of each component from their suppliers. Hence, companies along the product lifecycle require a tool, not only to facilitate the computing of the environmental footprint, but also help reduce/balance the environmental impact during the lifecycle of the product. This paper proposes to develop a procedure that companies will use to evaluate, improve and externally advertise their product’s environmental footprint to customers.


Discrete event simulation sustainable production product lifecycle environmental analysis sustainable manufacturing 


  1. 1.
    MAX Annual Climate Report (2008), (accessed January 16, 2010)
  2. 2.
    Interview with Pär Larshans, HR and Sustainability Manager, MAX Hamburgerrestauranger ABGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Finnveden, G., Hauschild, M.Z., Ekvall, T., Guinée, J., Heijungs, R., Hellweg, S., Koehler, A., Pennington, D., Suh, S.: Recent Developments in Life Cycle Assessment. Journal of Environmental Management 91, 1–21 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reap, J., Bras, B., Newcomb, P.J., Carmichael, C.: Improving Life Cycle Assessment by Including Spatial, Dynamic and Place-Based Modeling. In: Proceedings of DETC 2003 ASME (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Andersson, J., Johansson, B., Berglund, J., Skoogh, A.: Framework for Ecolabeling using Discrete Event Simulation. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Spring Simulation Multiconference, Orlando, FL, USA (2012)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ball, P.D., Evans, S., Levers, A., Ellison, D.: Zero carbon manufacturing facility – towards integrating material, energy, and waste process flows. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part B: Journal of Engi-neering Manufacture 223(9), 1085–1096 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maurice, B., Frischknecht, R., Coelho-Schwirtz, V., Hungerbühler, K.: Uncertainty analysis in life cycle inventory. Application to the production of electricity with French coal power plants. Journal of Cleaner Production 8, 95–108 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heilala, J., Saija, V., Tonteri, H., Montonen, J., Johansson, B., Stahre, J., Lind, S.: Simulation-Based Sustainable Manufacturing System Design. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 1922–1930 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cao, H., Chou, Y.-C.: Mobile Agent Based Integration Framework for Flexible Dynamic Job Shop Scheduling. In: Proceedings of the 2009 ASME Design for Manufacturing and the Life Cycle Conference, San Diego, California, USA, August 30- September 2 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nagel, C., Meyer, P.: Caught between ecology and economy: end-of-life aspects of environmentally conscious manufacturing. Computers & Industrial Engineering 36, 781–792 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Feifel, S., Walk, W., Wursthorn, S.: LCA, how are you doing today? A snapshot from the 5th German LCA workshop. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 15, 139–142 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Skoogh, A., Johansson, B.: Time-consumption analysis of input data activities in discrete event simulation projects. In: Proceedings of the 2007 Swedish Production Symposium (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Robertson, N., Perera, T.: Automated data collection for simulation? Simulation Practice and Theory 9, 349–364 (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Skoogh, A., Johansson, B., Stahre, J.: Automated Input Data Management: Evaluation of a Concept for Reduced Time-Consumption in Discrete Event Simulation. Simulation: Transactions of the Society for Modeling and Simulation International 88(11), 1279–1293 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    SISO – Simulation Interoperability Standards Organization, CMSD Product Development Group. Standard for: Core Manufacturing Simulation Data - UML Model (May 11, 2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rabe, M., Spieckermann, S., Wenzel, S.: A New Procedure Model for Verification and Validation in Production and Logistics Simulation. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Winter Simulation Conference, pp. 1717–1726 (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Herrmann, C., Thiede, S., Kara, S., Hesselbach, J.: Energy oriented simulation of manufacturing systems - Concept and application. CIRP Annals Manufacturing Technology 60(1), 45–48 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thiede, S., Herrmann, C., Kara, S.: State of Research and an innovative Approach for simulating Energy Flows of Manufacturing Systems. In: Glocalized Solutions for Sustainability in Manufacturing CIRP Braunschweig (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hesselbach, J., Herrmann, C., Detzer, R., Martin, L., Thiede, S., Lüdemann, B.: Energy Efficiency through optimized coordination of production and technical building services. In: Proceeding of the 15th Conference on Life Cycle Engineering, Sydney (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dietmair, A., Verl, A.: A generic energy consumption model for decision making and energy efficiency optimisation in manufacturing. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering 2(2), 123 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Heilala, J., Vatanen, S., Tonteri, H., Montonen, J., Lind, S., Johansson, B., Stahre, J.: Simulation-based sustainable manufacturing system design. In: Mason, S.J. (Hg.) 2008 Winter Simuation Conference (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hornberger, M.: Total Energy Efficiency Management. Vom Energiemanagementsystem zur Simulation der Energieverbrauchswerte auf Prozessebene. In: Elektronik Ecodesign Congress, München (2009)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Johansson, B., Mani, M., Skoogh, A., Leong, S.: Discrete Event Simulation to generate Requirements Specification for Sustainable Manufacturing Systems Design (2009)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Junge, M.: Simulationsgestützte Entwicklung und Optimierung einer energieeffizienten Produktionssteuerung. Dissertation, Univ. Kassel (2007)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Löfgren, B.: Capturing the life cycle environmental performance of a company’s manufacturing system. Göteborg. Chalmers University of Technology (2009)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Rahimifard, S., Seow, Y., Childs, T.: Minimising Embodied Product Energy to support energy efficient manufacturing. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 59, 25–28 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Solding, P., Petku, D., Mardan, N.: Using simulation for more sustainable production systems – methodologies and case studies. Journal of Sustainable Engineering 2(2), 111–122 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Weinert, N., Chiotellis, S., Seliger, G.: Concept for Energy-Aware Production Planning based on Energy Blocks. In: GCSM 2009: Proceedings of the 7th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing, pp. 75–80 (2009)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wohlgemuth, V., Page, B., Kreutzer, W.: Combining discrete event simulation and material flow analysis in a component-based approach to industrial environmental protection. Environmental Modelling & Software, Jg. 21(H. 11), 1607–1617 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Production SystemsChalmers University of TechnologyGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations