Advertisement

Energy Efficient Process Planning System – The ENEPLAN Project

Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 397)

Abstract

The key factor to success, towards a competitive energy consumption reduction, is the effective involvement of SMEs both in the use of more efficient machines and in the Design of an Environment for new products. A specific product can be manufactured in different ways, based on cost optimization rather than on production flexibility and energy efficiency with the involvement of different suppliers. The ENEPLAN project aims at the development of a digital and real, energy-efficient, multi-process, networked, manufacturing system, adapted to the functional specifications of metal formed or machined parts for automotive, aeronautic and domestic appliances. Seventeen partners, coming from seven European countries and the participation of OEMs, SMEs, RTD and technology providers, who work jointly to deliver through ENEPLAN a manufacturing planning decision support tool (meta-CAM tool), for the optimization of the plant operation. This tool will be used from the conceptual phase of the product (final blueprints) to its final dispatch to the customer. This paper will provide a short overview of the ENEPLAN project and its ongoing developments, while the existing results will be presented and discussed and the next steps will be described.

Keywords

Energy efficiency process planning Meta-CAM tool process optimization 

References

  1. 1.
    CECIMO Statistical Toolbox, September 2010 Edition (2010), http://www.cecimo.eu
  2. 2.
    EUROSTAT 2012 (Key figures on European business) (2010) ISSN 1830-9720Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Draft Working Plan of the Ecodesign Directive (2009-2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Directive of the European Parliament on Energy using Products (2005/32/EC)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dietmair, A., Verl, A.: Energy consumption forecasting and optimization for tool machines. In: Institute for Control Engineering of Machine Tools and Manufacturing Units (ISW), Universität Stuttgart, www.mmscience.eu/archives/MM_Science_20090305.pdf
  6. 6.
    Papakostas, N., Efthymiou, K., Georgoulias, K., Chryssolouris, G.: On the configuration and planning of dynamic manufacturing networks. Logistics Research 5(3-4), 105–111 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    ENEPLAN site, http://www.eneplan.eu/
  8. 8.
    Jebaraj, S., Iniyan, S.: A review of energy models. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 10, 281–311 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bhatt, M.S.: Energy audit case studies I – steam systems. Applied Thermal Engineering 20, 285–296 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Trygg, L.: Swedish Industrial and Energy Supply Measures in a European System Perspective. PhD Thesis, Division of Energy Systems, Linköping University, Sweden (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    NSF Blue Ribbon Panel: Simulation Based Engineering Science, NSF Report (2006), http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/reports/sbes_final_report.pdf
  12. 12.
    Fu, M.C., Andradóttir, S., Carson, J.S., Glover, F., Harell, C.R., Ho, Y.-C., Kelly, J.P., Robinson, S.M.: Integrating Optimisation and Simulation: Research and Practice. In: Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference, Arlington, VA, December 9-12. IEEE (2000)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tempelmeier, H.: Practical considerations in the optimization of flow production systems. International Journal of Production Research 41(1), 149–170 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chryssolouris, G., Chan, S., Cobb, W.: Decision Making on the Factory Floor: An Integrated Approach to Process Planning and Scheduling. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing 1(3/4), 315–319 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chryssolouris, G.: Manufacturing Systems: Theory and Practice, 2nd edn. Springer, New York (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chryssolouris, G., Mavrikios, D., Papakostas, N., Mourtzis, D., Michalos, G., Georgoulias, K.: Digital manufacturing: history, perspectives, and outlook. Proceedings of the I MECH E Part B Journal of Engineering Manufacture 222, 451–462 (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Chryssolouris, G., Papakostas, N., Mavrikios, D.: A perspective on manufacturing strategy: Produce more with less. CIRP Journal of Manufacturing Science and Technology 1, 45–52 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.PRIMA INDUSTRIE S.p.A.Collegno (TO)Italy
  2. 2.Laboratory for Manufacturing Systems and AutomationUniversity of PatrasPatrasGreece

Personalised recommendations