Advertisement

Innovation as the Fuel of Commercial Success

  • Marcus Hacke
  • Stefan Diefenbach
  • Dirk Wellershaus
Chapter
Part of the Management for Professionals book series (MANAGPROF)

Abstract

Innovation is an essential part of lasting growth and profitability in business. Bringing new ideas to market requires companies to be innovative, a quality that has become a challenging proposition due to the pressing need for lower investment risk and shorter product lifecycles, as well as the untrammelled globalization of the economy. Cooperating with partners along an interactive value chain is becoming an increasingly important response to this challenge. Working as communities across the boundaries of disciplines on the (further) development of products and solutions or on shared business models allows companies to spread risks and use synergies in their ecosystems. For each actor to become more agile in that ecosystem, companies need to open up their in-house innovation processes (open innovation), turning the ecosystem around them into a shared frame of reference for their innovation activities along the value chain (e.g. with suppliers, technology partners, clients, or academic research institutions). It is usually up to their IT service organizations to coordinate this complex interplay of different actors and to aggregate the results of this shared work, so as to turn them into scalable and successful innovations that can be brought to market.

References

  1. Andersson, H., Kaplan, J., & Smolinski, B. (2012). Capturing value from IT infrastructure innovation. McKinsey on Business Technology, 27, 14–23.Google Scholar
  2. Arnold, H., Erner, M., Möckel, P., & Schläffer, C. (Eds.). (2012). Applied technology and innovation management. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  3. Bughin, J., Chui, M., & Johnson, B. (2008). The next step in open innovation. Brussels: McKinsey Technology Initiative Perspective.Google Scholar
  4. Dapp, T. F. (2011). Die digitale Gesellschaft – Neue Wege zu mehr Transparenz, Beteiligung und Innovation (DB Research – Trendforschung – Aktuelle Themen 517). Frankfurt: Deutsche Bank Research.Google Scholar
  5. Goldman, S. L., Nagel, R. N., & Preiss, K. (1995). Agile competitors and virtual organisations. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
  6. Hauschild, J. (1997). Innovationsmanagement. Munich: Vahlen.Google Scholar
  7. Hischke, S., Mühlner, J., Salwinczek, C., Wolf, M., & Engel B. (2009). Zukunft der Dienste und Netze: Mit Marktwissen zum Erfolg digitaler Innovationen (Einleitung). In S. Hischke, J. Mühlner, C. Salwinczek, M. Wolf, & B. Engel (Eds.), Nationaler IT Gipfel – Arbeitsgruppe 2 – Konvergenz der Medien, 7–12.Google Scholar
  8. Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of Groupthink. New York: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  9. Kidd, P. T. (2012). Agile manufacturing: A strategy for the 21st century (Agility Forum - online publication). Retrieved December 21, 2012, from www.cheshirehenbury.com/agility/index.html 2012
  10. Liehr, T., & Wolf, M. (2009). Innovationsmanagement: Balance zwischen Kreativität und Disziplin – Der Prozess der Neuprodukt-Entwicklung auf Basis voridentifizierter Bedürfnislücken im Markt. In S. Hischke, J. Mühlner, C. Salwinczek, M. Wolf, & B. Engel (Eds.), Nationaler IT Gipfel – Arbeitsgruppe 2 – Konvergenz der Medien – Zukunft der Dienste und Netze: Mit Marktwissen zum Erfolg digitaler Innovationen, 103–127.Google Scholar
  11. Reichwald, R., & Piller, F. (2009). Interaktive Wertschöpfung – Open Innovation, Individualisierung und neue Formen der Arbeitsteilung. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.Google Scholar
  12. Rickmann, H., Diefenbach, S., & Brüning, K. T. (2012). IT-Outsourcing – Neue Herausforderungen im Zeitalter von Cloud Computing. Berlin: Springer Gabler.Google Scholar
  13. Specht, G., Beckmann, C., & Amelingmeyer, J. (2002). F&E Management – Kompetenzen im Innovationsmanagement. Stuttgart: Schäffer-Poeschel.Google Scholar
  14. Velu, C., Barrett, M., Kohli, R., & Salge T. (2010). Thriving in open innovation ecosystems: Toward a collaborative market orientation (Working Paper Series 4/2010). Cambridge: Cambridge Judge Business School.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marcus Hacke
    • 1
  • Stefan Diefenbach
    • 2
  • Dirk Wellershaus
    • 2
  1. 1.T-Systems International GmbHFrankfurt am MainGermany
  2. 2.T-Systems International GmbHBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations