Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Modeling of Land-Use and Ecological Dynamics

Part of the book series: Cities and Nature ((CITIES))

Abstract

The driving ideas at the backdrop of the current discussion of urbanization, sprawl and sustainability is the notion that urbanization is associated with low-density sprawl (Duany and Talen 2002; Sushinsky et al. 2013) and that sprawl reduces the amount of open spaces, fragments open spaces (Forman 1995, p. 418) and as a result adversely affects biodiversity (Fahrig 2001; Fahrig 2003; Alberti 2005; Donnelly and Marzluff 2006; Groom et al. 2006; Theobald et al. 2012). It is far from certain that these notions describe precisely the extant reality. While sprawl does reduce the amount of open space within boundaries of cities and does cause fragmentation, it does not necessarily reduce biodiversity. In some cities, the fragmented patches of open spaces remain interconnected allowing living spaces for plants and animals. Indeed, some view polycentric urban expansion as an opportunity to possible amelioration of declining biodiversity (Czamanski et al. 2008; Olson et al. 2011).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Richard Thaler (2010), the father of behavioral economics is conducting a research project to illustrate and explain this phenomenon. See http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/thaler10/thaler10_index.html.

  2. 2.

    Noted early exception is the Cadillac model of Krugman in Fujita, Krugman and Venables (1999).

References

  • Alberti, M. (2005). The effects of urban patterns on ecosystem function. International Regional Science Review, 28(2), 168–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alonso, W. (1964). Location and land use. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benguigui, L., & Czamanski, D. (2004). Simulation analysis of the fractality of cities. Geographical Analysis, 36(1), 69–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benguigui, L., Czamanski, D., Marinov, M., & Portugali, Y. (2000). When and where is a city fractal? Environment & Planning B, 27, 507–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, J., Strumsky, D., & West, G. B. (2010). Urban scaling and its deviations: Revealing the structure of wealth, innovation and crime across cities. PLoS One, 5, e13541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolund, P., & Hunhammar, S. (1999). Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecological Economics, 29, 293–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. E. (2003). Human population: The next half century. Science, 302(5648), 1172–1175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czamanski, D., Benenson, I., Malkinson, D., Marinov, M., Roth, R., & Wittenberg, L. (2008). Urban dynamics and ecosystems. International Review of Environmental and Resource Economics, 2, 1–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, R., & Marzluff, J. M. (2006). Relative importance of habitat quantity, structure, and spatial pattern to birds in urbanizing environments. Urban Ecosystems, 9(2), 99–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duany, A., & Talen, E. (2002). Transect planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(3), 245–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig, L. (2001). How much habitat is enough? Biological Conservation, 100, 65–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig, L. (2003). Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics, 34, 487–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, J. D., Cleeton, S. H., Lyons, T. P., & Miller, J. R. (2012). Urbanization and the predation paradox: The role of trophic dynamics in structuring vertebrate communities. BioScience, 62, 809–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman, R. T. (1995). Land mosaics: The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita, M., Krugman, P., & Venables, A. J. (1999). The spatial economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groom, M. J., Meffe, G. K., & Carroll, C. R. (2006). Principles of conservation biology. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isard, W. (1956). Location and space-economy; a general theory relating to industrial location, market areas, land use, trade, and urban structure. Cambridge: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiviat, E., & Johnson, E. A. (2013). Biodiversity assessment handbook for New York City. American Museum of Natural History, Center for Biodiversity and Conservation, New York and Hudsonia Ltd., Annandale.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreuzpointner, J. B. (1876). Notizen zur Flora Munchens. Flora, 59, 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. Journal of Political Economy, 99(3), 483–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, M. L. (2008). Effects of urbanization on species richness: A review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosystems, 11, 161–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandström, U. G., Angelstam, P., & MikusiÅ„ski, G. (2006). Ecological diversity of birds in relation to the structure of urban green space. Landscape and Urban Planning, 77(1), 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sushinsky, J. R., Rhodes, J. R., Possingham, H. P., Gill, T. K., & Fuller, F. R. (2013). How should we grow cities to minimize their biodiversity impacts? Global Change Biology, 19(2), 401–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thaler, R. (2010). The father of behavioral economics is conducting a research project to illustrate and explain this phenomenon. http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/thaler10/thaler10_index.html

  • Theobald, D. M., Reed, S. E., Fields, K., & Soule, M. (2012). Connecting natural landscapes using a landscape permeability model to prioritize conservation activities in the United States. Conservation Letters 0, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thünen, J. H. (1826). Der Isolierte Staat in Beziehung Auf Landwirtschaft Und Nationalökonomie. Hamburg: Perthes. German: Wartenberg, C.M. (1966) Von Thünen’s Isolated State (trans: Wartenberg, C.M.). Oxford: Pergamon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Population Division. (2002). World urbanization prospects: The 2001 revision. ESA/P/WP.173. New York: United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, J. B. L. (1871). The flora of Hyde Park and Kensington Gardens. London: Taylor and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, C., et al. (2009). Urban landscape ecology and its evaluation: A review. In A. Dupont & H. Jacobs (Eds.), Landscape ecology research trends (pp. 45–69). New York: Nova Science.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Danny Czamanski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Czamanski, D., Benenson, I., Malkinson, D. (2013). Introduction. In: Malkinson, D., Czamanski, D., Benenson, I. (eds) Modeling of Land-Use and Ecological Dynamics. Cities and Nature. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40199-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics