Advertisement

Gender Opportunities in Psychosocial Oncology

Chapter
Part of the Recent Results in Cancer Research book series (RECENTCANCER, volume 197)

Abstract

Avoidance of discussions of sex and gender in medicine reflects the larger lingering societal discomfort with any discussion that links potential sex and gender differences with superiority. The data show that there is more intra-sexual then intersexual variation in men and women. When speaking about sex and gender the literature reflects that, on average, there are many differences, and although they are small, that when taken together, the impact may be quite robust. Sex and gender differences are relevant to how individuals, couples, and families experience and cope with serious illness; however, these important and obvious variables are seldom taken into account when counseling seriously ill patients and their families. Cancer is a complex disease that brings into sharp relief the potential alignments and misalignments in the sexes. In this chapter we have attempted to communicate the imperative for and importance of understanding people under stress within the context of sex and gender. Gender-specific medicine is a very young movement for scientific study but one that has great potential to maximize adaptation and mutual respect at a time when men and women are redefining themselves and adapting to new social realities and challenges.

Keywords

Autism Spectrum Disorder Anorexia Nervosa Sudden Infant Death Syndrome Natural Inclination Emotional Concern 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aliprantis D, Dunne T, Fee K (2011) The growing difference in college attainment between women and men. Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland. http://www.clevelandfed.org/research/commentary/2011/2011-21.cfm. Accessed 28 Sept 2012
  2. Baider L, Ever-Hadani P, Goldzweig G et al (2003) Is perceived family support a relevant variable in psychological distress? A sample of prostate and breast cancer couples. J Psychos Res 55:453–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Becker JB, Berkley KJ, Geary N et al (2008) Sex differences in the brain: from genes to behavior. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2011) Women in the labor force. Available at http://www.bls.gov/cps/wlf-table1-2011.pdf Accessed 1 Oct 2004
  5. Buss DM (1995) Psychological sex differences: Origins through sexual selection. The Am Psychol 50:164–168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buss DM (2011) Evolutionary psychology: the new science of the mind, 4th edn. Allyn and Bacon, Needham HeightsGoogle Scholar
  7. Buss DM, Schmitt DP (2011) Evolutionary psychology and feminism. Sex Roles 64:768–787CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calleja-Agius J, Mallia P, Sapiano K et al (2012) A review of the management of intersex Neonatal Netw 31:97–103Google Scholar
  9. Curry C, Cossich T, Matthews JP et al (2002) Uptake of psychosocial referrals in an outpatient cancer setting: improving service accessibility via the referral process. Support Care Cancer 10:549–555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ezer H, Rigol Chachamovich JL, Chachamovich E (2011) Do men and their wives see it the same way? Congruence within couples during the first year of prostate cancer. Psychooncology 20:155–164Google Scholar
  11. Fergus KD, Gray RE (2009) Relationship vulnerabilities during breast cancer: patient and partner perspectives. Psychooncology 18:1311–1322PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hagedoorn M, Sanderman R, Buunk BP et al (2002) Failing in spousal caregiving: the ‘identity-relevant stress’ hypothesis to explain sex differences in caregiver distress. Br J Health Psychol 7:481–494PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hagedoorn M, Sanderman R, Bolks HN et al (2008) Distress in couples coping with cancer: a meta-analysis and critical review of role and gender effects. Psychol Bull 134:1–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haier JR, Jung RE, Yeo RA et al (2005) The neuroanatomy of general intelligence: sex matters. NeuroImage 25:320–327PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Halpern DF (2000) Sex differences in cognitive abilities, 3rd edn. Erlbaum, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  16. Institute of Medicine (2001) Exploring the biological contributions of human health: does sex matter?. National Academy Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  17. Kahneman D (2011) Thinking fast and slow. Farrar, Straus and Giroux, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  18. Kim Y, Loscalzo M, Wellisch D et al (2006) Gender differences in caregiving stress among caregivers of cancer survivors. Psychooncology 15:1086–1092PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kim Y, Baker F, Spillers RL (2007) Cancer caregivers’ quality of life: effects of gender, relationship, and appraisal. J Pain Symp Manage 34:294–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lee PA, Houk CP, Ahmed FS et al (2006) Consensus statement on management of intersex disorders. Pediatrics 118:488–500CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Legato MJ (2008) Why men die first. Palgrave MacMillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Lewis MA, McBride CM, Pollak KI et al (2006) Understanding health behavior change amnion couples: an interdependence and communal coping approach. Soc Sci Med 62:1369–1380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Loscalzo MJ, Kim Y, Clark K (2010) Gender and Caregiving. In: Holland J (ed) Psycho-oncology 2nd edn. Oxford, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. Matthews BA (2003) Role and gender differences in cancer-related distress: a comparison of survivor and caregiver self-reports. Oncol Nurs Forum 30:493–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Merckaert I, Libert Y, Messin S et al (2010) Cancer patients’ desire for psychological support: prevalence and implications for screening patients’ psychological needs. Psychooncology 19:141–149PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States (2012) With Special Feature on Socioeconomic Status and Health. Hyattsville, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  27. Pistrang N, Barker C (1995) The partner relationship in psychological response to breast cancer. Soc Sci Med 40:789–797PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Resnick S, Driscoll I (2008) Sex differences in brain aging and Alzheimer’s disorders. In: Becker JB et al (ed) Sex differences in the brain: from genes to behavior. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Rosen TS, Bateman D (2004) The role of gender in neonatology. In: Legato M (ed) Gender-specific medicine. Elsevier Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  30. Silverman I, Choi J, Peters M (2007) The hunter-gatherer theory of sex differences in spatial abilities: data from 40 countries. Arch Sex Behav 36:261–268PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stanton AL (2010) Positive consequences of the experience of cancer: perceptions of growth and meaning. In: Holland J (ed) Psycho-oncology, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Taylor SE, Klein LC, Lewis BP et al (2000) Biobehavioral responses in stress in females: tend and-befriend, not fight-or-flight. Psychol Rev 107:411–429PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vandermassen G (2005) Whos afraid of charles darwin? Debating feminism and evolutionary theory. Rowman and Littlefield, MarylandGoogle Scholar
  34. World Health Organization (1998) Gender and Health: Technical Paper. GenevaGoogle Scholar
  35. Zabora J, Brintzenhofeszoc K, Curbow B et al (2001) The prevalence of psychological distress by cancer site. Psychooncology 10:19–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zaider TI, Kissane DW (2010) Psychosocial interventions for couples and families coping with cancer. In: Holland J (ed) Psycho-oncology, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.City of HopeDuarteUSA
  2. 2.City of HopeDurateUSA

Personalised recommendations