On the Duality of E-Participation – Towards a Foundation for Citizen-Led Participation

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8061)


What remains unclear after a decade of e-Participation research and practice is the extent to which the social web and informal channels have empowered citizens in government-citizen interactions where government determines what, where and how to discuss. Lately, attention has shifted to how these informal channels could be better harnessed as part of a holistic e-Participation solution. However, this implicit notion of duality of e-Participation is yet to be explored or conceptualized. This paper provides a first step towards understanding the duality of Government-led and Citizen-led e-Participation based on structuration and dynamic capabilities theories. We employ structuration theory to understand how dynamics of power between government and citizen in deciding what is important for the society and the solutions to adopt could tilt towards the side of citizens through citizen-led deliberations. Through the dynamic capabilities theory, we determine additional capabilities required by governments to meaningfully exploit and sustain citizen-led e-participation as a part or a holistic e-participation framework. We show through a case study how our resulting analytical tool could be employed in identifying salient technical, organisational and political issues in an on-going Irish e-Participation initiative planning to adopt citizen-led deliberation.


e-Participation citizen-led e-Participation e-Participation framework 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Sæbø, O., Rose, J., Skiftenesflak, L.: The shape of eParticipation: Characterizing an emerging research area. Government Information Quarterly 25, 400–428 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chadwick, A.: Bringing E-Democracy Back In: Why it Matters for Future Research on E-Governance. Social Science Computer Review 21, 443–455 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Van Dijk, J.A.G.M.: Models of Democracy Ken Hacker & Jan van Dijk. Sage Publications Copyright (2000) Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Macintosh, A., Coleman, S., Schneeberger, A.: eParticipation: The Research Gaps. In: Macintosh, A., Tambouris, E. (eds.) ePart 2009. LNCS, vol. 5694, pp. 1–11. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chitnis, K.: The duality of development: recasting participatory communication for development using structuration theory 13, 228–249 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Paddon, R.W.: e-Participation in Canada: Probing Online Public Policy Development By (2009) Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Giddens, A.: The Constitution of Society Elements of the Theory of Structuration (1984)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang, C.L.: Dynamic Capabilities: A Review and Research Agenda Dynamic Capabilities: A Review and Research Agenda 9, 31–51 (2007) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Teece, D.J., Pisano, G., Shuen, A., Shuen, A.M.Y.: Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management 18, 509–533 (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cepeda, G., Vera, D.: Dynamic capabilities and operational capabilities: A knowledge management perspective. Journal of Business Research 60, 426–437 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Connor, G.C.O.: Major Innovation as a Dynamic Capability: A Systems Approach, 313–330 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    OECD: Engaging Citizens in Policy-making (2001) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Macintosh, A.: Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. In: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 10 p. (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    DESA: UN Global E-government Readiness Report 2005 From E-government to E-inclusion (2005) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rose, J., Sæbø, Ø.: Designing Deliberation Systems. The Information Society 26, 228–240 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tambouris, E., Liotas, N., Kaliviotis, D., Tarabanis, K.: A Framework for Scoping eParticipation. In: 8th Annual International Digital Govenment Research Conference, pp. 288–289 (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lee, D., Loutas, N., Sánchez-nielsen, E., Mogulkoc, E.: A Three-tiered Approach to eParticipation (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lane, M., Coleman, P.: Technology ease of use through social networking media. Technology, 1–12Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Digital Enterprise Research InstituteNational University of IrelandGalwayIreland

Personalised recommendations