Impact of Human Resources Practices upon Turnover and Productivity in the Banking Sector of Pakistan

  • Nadeem A. Syed
  • Farooq A. Cheema
  • Asif Kamran
  • Hira Khalid
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 242)

Abstract

When we talk about the HR practices, we come to know that good HRM practices are instrumental in helping to achieve departmental objectives and en- hance productivity. A firm’s current and potential human resources are very im- portant for the development and execution of the successful implementation of its strategic business plan, and so in the banking sector, retaining the trustable and loyal workforce can manage to bring productivity for the firm and lower turnover among the employees. HR practices focus clearly on changes to employees’ jobs and career prospects. Situational factors such as commitment of employees change the process significantly influences over the quality and type of skills that the new employees possess. By providing them with the formal and informal training experiences, such as basic skills training, on-the-job experience, coaching, mentoring, and management development, can further influence employees’ and satisfaction with the change process make important contributions to withdrawal of employee commitment, loyalty, trust, pessimism and powerlessness. The result of effectively managing human resources is an enhanced ability to attract and retain qualified em- ployees who are motivated to perform. The results include greater profitability, low employee turnover, high product quality, lower production costs, and more rapid acceptance and implementation of corporate strategy.

Keywords

Human Resource Management (HRM) Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Arthur, J (1994) Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover. Academy of Management Journal 37(3):670–687Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gerhart B, Wright PM, Mahan GC et al (1996) Comment on measurement error in research on human resources and firm performance: How much error is there and how does it influence effect size estimates? Personnel Psychology 53(4):835–854Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berger AN, Mester LJ (1997) Inside the black box: What explains differences in the efficien- cies of financial institutions? Journal of Banking & Finance 21(7):895–947Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Becker BE, Huselid MA (1998) High performance work systems and financial performance: A synthesis of research and managerial implications. In: Ferris GR (ed.), Research in Person- nel and Human Resource Management 16:53–101Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Becker BE, Huselid MA, Pickus PS et al (2001) HR as a source of shareholder value: Re- search and recommendations. Human Resource Management 36(1):39–47Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brace N, Kemp R, Snelgar R (2000) Spss for psychologists: A guide to data analysis using Spss for windows. Psychology PressGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dess I, Hitt K (1990) Linking strategy and human resource practices: How employee and customer contracts are created. Human Resource Management 33(3):463–489Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dyer L, Reeves T (1995) HR strategies and firm performance: What do we know and where do we need to go. International Journal of Human Resource Management 6(3):656-670Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Frei FX, Harker PT, Hunter LW (2000) Inside the black box: What makes a bank efficient? In: Harkcr PT, Zenios SA (eds.), The Performance of Financial Institutions, Cambridge Uni- versity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guest D (2000) Human resource management, corporate performance and employee wellbe- ing: Building the worker into HRM. The Journal of Industrial Relations 44(3):335–358Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guthrie JP (2001) High-involvement work practices, turnover, and productivity: Evidence from New Zealand. Academy of Management Journal 44(1):180–191Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Huseild MA (1995) The impact of human resource management: An agenda for the 1990 s. International Journal of Human Resource Management 1(1):17–43Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sorohan EG (1994) When the ties that bind break. Training & Development 48(2):28–33Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Martocchio JJ (2009) Research in personnel and human resources management. EmeraldGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Koch MJ, Mcgrath R (1996) Improving labor productivity: Human resource management policies do matter. Strategic Management Journal 17(5):335–354Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kochan T, Osterman P (1994) The mutual gains enterprise. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lawler E (1992) The ultimate advantage: Creating the high-involvement organization. Jossey- Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lawler E (1996) From the ground up: Six principles for building the new logic corporation. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Levine D (1995) Reinventing the workplace: How business and employers can both win. Brookings Institution, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    MacDuffie JP (1995) Human resource bundles and manufacturing performance: Organiza- tional logic and flexible production systems in the world auto industry. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 48(2):197–221Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nadeem A. Syed
    • 1
  • Farooq A. Cheema
    • 2
  • Asif Kamran
    • 3
  • Hira Khalid
    • 1
  1. 1.Management Science DepartmentNational University (Fast)KarachiPakistan
  2. 2.Management Science DepartmentInstitute of Business TechnologyKarachiPakistan
  3. 3.School of Management & EconomicsUniversity of Electronic Science & Technology of ChinaChengduP. R. China

Personalised recommendations