Advertisement

Conflict Types and Innovative Work Behavior: Exploring a New Path

  • Rabia Imran
  • Arshad Zaheer
  • Afsheen Fatima
  • Muhammad Asif Khan
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 242)

Abstract

The research was aimed at conceptualizing and empirically testing a path to highlight the interrelationships of conflict types and innovative work behavior. A random sample of 320 managers of telecommunication sector of Pakistan was selected for the study. The conceptual model was empirically tested using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The findings reveal positive and significant impact of task conflict on innovative work behavior. Further, it shows the significant positive impact of innovative work behavior on process conflict. There is also a significant and positive impact of process conflict on relationship conflict. This study presents a role model for the strategic managers and practitioners as a guideline to stimulate innovative work behavior through better conflict management.

Keywords

Innovative work behavior Task conflict Process conflict Relationship conflict 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Brahnam SD, Margavio TM, Hignite MA et al (2005) A bender-based categorization for conflict resolution. Journal of Management Development 24(3):197–208Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Vokic NP, Sontor S (2005) Conflict management styles in croatian enterprises-the relationship between individual characteristics and conflict handling styles. Working Paper SeriesGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Darling JR, Walker WE (2001) Effective conflict management: use of the behavioral style model. Leadership and Organization Development Journal 22(5):230–242Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Rahim MA (1983) A measure of styles of handling interpersonal conflict. Academy of Management Journal 26(2):368–376Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    West MA (2000) Reflexivity, revolution, and innovation in work teams. Advances in Interdisciplinary Studies of Work Teams 5:1–29Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Klijn M, Tomic W (2010) A review of creativity within organizations from a psychological perspective. Journal of Management Development 29(4):322–343Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Janssen O (2000) Job demand, perception of effort reward fairness and innovative work behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 73(3):287–302Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cetin MO, Hacifazlioglu O (2004) Conflict management styles: a comparative study of university academics and high school teachers. Journal of American Academy of Business 5(1/2):325–332Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Banner DK (1995) Conflict resolution: a recontextualization. Leadership and Organization Development Journal 16(1):31–34Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Voki’c NP, Sontor S (2005) Conflict management styles in croatian enterprises-the relationship between individual characteristics and conflict handling styles. Working Paper SeriesGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Anwar N, Maitlo Q, Soomro MB et al (2012) Task conflicts and its relationship with employee’s performance. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business 3(9):1338–1343Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jehn KA, Greer L, Levine S et al (2008) The effects of conflict types, dimensions, and emergent states on group outcomes. Group Decision and Negotiation 17(6):465–495Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jehn KA (1995) A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly 40(2):256–282Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Parker SK, Williams HM, Turner N (2006) Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology 91(3):636–652Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Crant J (2000) Proactive behavior in organizations. Journal of Management 26(3):435–462Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    De Jong JPJ (2006) Individual innovation: the connection between leadership and employees’ innovative work behavior. Paper provided by EIM business and policy research in its series scales research reports with number R200604. Available at: http://www.entrepreneurship-sme.eu/pdf-ez/R200604.pdf
  17. 17.
    Drucker PF (1985) Innovation and entrepreneurship: practice and principles. Heinemann, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kanter R (1988) When a thousand flowers bloom: structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. In: Staw BM, Cummings LL (eds) Research in Organizational Behavior 10:169–211Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lu L, Zhou F, Leung K (2011) Effects of task and relationship conflicts on individual work behaviors. International Journal of Conflict Management 22(2):131–150Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Van de Ven AA, Poole MS (1988) Paradoxical requirements for a theory of organizational change. In Quinn RE, Cameron KS (eds), Paradoxes and transformation: Toward a theory of change in organization and management, pp 19–63Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Scott GS, Bruce AR (1994) Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of innovation in the workplace. The Academy of Management Journal 37:580–607Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jones ML (1993) Role conflict: cause of burnout or energizer? Social work 38(2):136–141Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Seiber SD (1974) Toward a theory of role accumulation. American Sociological Review 39(4):567–578Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Amabile TM (1996) Creativity in context: update to the social psychology of creativity. Westview Press, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    West MA, Anderson NR (1996) Innovation in top management teams. Journal of Applied Psychology 81(6):680–693Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jehn KA, Northcraft G, Neale M (1999) Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly 44(4):741–763Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Amason AC (1996) Distinguishing the effect of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal 39(1):123–148Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Turner M, Pratkanis A (1997) Mitigating groupthink by stimulating constructive conflict. In: De Dreu CKW, Van de Vliert E (eds.), Using conflict in organizations 39–52Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Jehn KA (1997) A aualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly 42(3):530–557Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Shah PP, Jehn KA (1993) Do friends perform better that acquaintances: The interaction of friendship, conflict and task. Group Decision and Negotiation 2(2):149–166Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Zaman S (2006) Determinants of Innovative work behavior: Organizational and individual characteristics. Unpublished M.Phil Dissertation, National Institute of Psychology, Quaid-i- Azam University, IslamabadGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Arbuckle JL (2005) Amos 6.0 User’s Guide, SPSS Inc., Chicago, ILGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Joreskog KG, Sorbom D (1993) LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Manoux A, Clarke P, Marmot M (2002) Multiple measures of socioeconomic position and psychosocial health: Proximal and distal measures. International Journal of Epidemiology 31(6):1192–1199Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Schumacker RE, Lomax RG (2004) A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling, 2nd edn, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Sacker A, Bartley M, Firth D et al (2001) Dimensions of social inequality in the health of women in England: Occupational, material and behavioral pathways. Social Science and Medicine 52(5):763–781Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rabia Imran
    • 1
  • Arshad Zaheer
    • 2
  • Afsheen Fatima
    • 1
  • Muhammad Asif Khan
    • 3
  1. 1.University Institute of Management SciencesPMAS Arid Agriculture UniversityRawalpindiPakistan
  2. 2.Department of Management SciencesAIR UniversityIslamabadPakistan
  3. 3.Department of Management SciencesInstitute of Business and TechnologyKarachiPakistan

Personalised recommendations