A Framework to Explore Energy Saving Measures During Construction Phase

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 242)

Abstract

There has been a significant increase in interest and research in energy efficient buildings in recent years. In the construction phase of a building’s life cycle, contractors provide resources and select the means and methods of construction. To make the construction phase less energy intensive, the contractor has to purchase the required resources from the jobsite proximity and select less energy-intensive resources to minimize the energy consumption. Sometimes, it might not be possible to analyze and practice energy-saving measures for the whole project due to time and budget constraints. Therefore, it would be helpful for a contractor to focus on the most energy-consuming activities and deploy energy-efficient procurement to reduce energy consumption of a particular project. This requires a tool to estimate energy required for procurement and installation of the building elements and to identify the most energy-intensive activities. This research focuses on developing a spreadsheet-based tool to estimate energy consumption during construction of a project. The proposed framework uses the project’s bill of quantity, data related to materials transportation, and energy data for the required resources to estimate the probable energy consumption during construction. A case study was performed to demonstrate the application of the tool.

Keywords

Energy efficiency Energy information system Embodied energy Materials transportation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Horvath A (2004) Construction materials and the environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 29(1):181–204Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sharrard AL, Matthews HS, Roth M (2007) Environmental implications of construction site energy use and electricity generation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 133(11):846–854Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Samaneh Z, Mehdi N, Javier I et al (2013) Environmental impact assessment on construction sites. Construction Research Congress, available at: http://rebar.ecn.purdue.edu/crc2012/papers/pdfs/-21.pdf
  4. 4.
    Cole RJ (1998) Energy and greenhouse gas emissions associated with the construction of alternative structural systems. Building and Environment 34:335–348Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Khasreen MM, Banfill PFG, Menzies GF (2009) Life-cycle assessment and the environmental impact of buildings: A review. Sustainability 1(3):674–701Google Scholar
  6. 6.
  7. 7.
    MITEI (2013)Innovative buildings: Prudent use of energy and materials, available at: http://mitei.mit.edu/news/innovative-buildings-prudent-use-energy-and-materials
  8. 8.
    Bilec M, Ries R, Matthews HS et al (2006) Example of a hybrid life-cycle assessment of construction processes. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 12(4):207–215Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arnold AG (2008) Development of a method for recording energy costs and uses during the construction process. PhD Dissertation, A&M University, Texas, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Rinker School of Building ConstructionUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Civil EngineeringMalaviya National Institute of TechnologyJaipurIndia

Personalised recommendations