On the Key Factors for Firms’ Sustainable Growth: A Perspective Based on “Industrial Strategic Inflection Point” and Resource-Based View

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 242)

Abstract

With resource-based view as the theoretical support, against the research background of “industrial strategic inflection point”, this paper selects from theoretical plane four key resource factors influencing enterprise performance i.e. innovative ability, human capital, physical capital and slack resources, and discusses their relations with sustainable growth of enterprises, laying a theoretical foundation for further empirical research.

Keywords

Industrial strategic inflection point Sustainable growth of enterprises Resources Performance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Larry B, Ram C (2005) Transformation. CITIC Publishing HouseGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chris Z, James A (2002) Profit from the core: A return to growth in turbulent times. CITIC Publishing House, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhao C (2007) Break through the bottleneck: Establishing corporate strategic inflection point management system. Gansu Social Science Magazine 2:142–144 (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Zhao C, Yang B, Jie X (2007) Win at the inflection point — A strategy-based perspective. Scientific Progress and Countermeasures 4:44–47 (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zhao C (2008) Corporate strategic inflection point: Exploration and analysis of connotation and design of identification tool. Science and Technology Management Research 2:140–142 (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17:99–120Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barney J, Wright M, Ketchen D (2001) The resource-based view of the firm: ten years after 1991. Journal of Management 27(6):625–41Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barney JB (2001) Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: A ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management 6:643–650Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Porter ME (1980) Competitive strategy. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ricardo D (1817) Principles of political economy and taxation. John Murray publisher, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MassGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schulze W (1994) Two schools of thought in resource-based view. In: Shrivastiva P et al (eds.), Advances in strategic management. JAI Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Conner K (1991) An historical comparison of resource-based logic and five schools of thought within industrial organization economies: Do we have a new theory of the firm here? Journal of Management 17:121–154Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Peteraf M (1993) The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal 14:179–191Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hansen GS, Wernerfelt B (1989) Determinants of firm performance: The relative importance of economic and organizational factors. Strategic Management Journal 10:399–411Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rumelt RP (1991) How much does industry matter? Strategic Management Journal 12:167–185Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    McGahan AM, Porter ME (1997) How much does industry matter, really? Strategic Management Journal 18:15–30Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dierickx I, Cool K (1989) Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science 35:1504–1511Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Barney JB (1986) Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage? Academy of Management Review 11(3):656–665Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Makadok R (1999) Interfirm differences in scale economies and the evolution of market shares. Strategic Management Journal 20(10):935–952Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal 18(7):509–533Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Karim S, Mitchell W (2000) Path-dependent and path-breaking change: Reconfiguring business resources following acquisitions in the US. Strategic Management Journal 21(10):1061–1081Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Drucker PF (1954) The practice of management. Harper & Row Publisher Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Calantone RJ, Cavusgil ST, Zhao Y (2002) Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management 31(6):515–524Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Xue Q, Kong D (2004) Sustainable corporate competitive advantage — In innovation perspective. Economic Theory and Business Management (3):51–54 (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Prahalad CK, Hamel G (1990) The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review 90(3):79–91Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fuchs PH, Mifflin KE, Miller D et al (2000) Strategic integration: Competing in the age of capabilities. California Management Review 42(3):118–147Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lawson B, Samson D (2001) Developing innovation capability in organizations: A dynamic capabilities approach. International Journal of Innovation Management 5:377–400Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Verona G (1999) A resource-based view of product development. Academy of Management Review 24(1):132–141Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schultz TW (1961) Investment in human capital. American Economic Review 51:1–17Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Rosenkopf L, Nerkar A (2001) Beyond local search: Boundary spanning, exploration, and impact in the optical disc industry. Strategic Management Journal 22:287–306Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Hill CWL, Rothaermel FT (2003) The performance of incumbent firms in the face of radical technological innovation. Academy of Management Review 28:257–274Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Goode RB (1959) Adding to the stock Of physical and human capital. American Economic Review 49(2):147–155Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Yuan J, Liu T (2007) Enterprise innovation based on matching human capital and physical capital. Contemporary Economic Research 8:34–36 (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wiseman R, Bromiley P (1996) Towards a model of risk in declining organizations: An empirical examination of risk, performance and decline. Organization Science 7:524–543Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Nohria N, Gulati R (1996) Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal 39:1245–1264Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    George G (2005) Slack resources and the performance of privately held firms. Academy of Management Journal 48:661–676Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Petty W (1690) PoLiti arithmetic. Lord Shelborne 260–261Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business SchoolSichuan UniversityChengduPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations