Advertisement

An Empirical Study of the Technological Innovation Cooperation Performance Between the Resource-based Enterprises

  • Guichuan Zhou
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 242)

Abstract

This paper will discuss the impact of cooperative technological innovation motivation and cooperation in technology innovation model of relationship-oriented cooperation between enterprises of technological innovation, and thus cooperation between enterprises of technological innovation based on the resource-based enterprises to technology innovation motivation and cooperation in technology innovation model to classify. And analysis of variance to verify its impact on the performance of the cooperation between the resource-based enterprises technological innovation. On this basis, the use of stepwise regression equation to discuss the market structure factors, natural environmental factors, technical capacity factors, government policy factors, firm size and type of business ownership on the performance of the cooperation between the resource-based enterprises technological innovation. In order to explore the cooperation between the resource-based enterprises that affect technological innovation performance influencing factors and role of law, to provide a theoretical basis and practical guidance to improve and enhance the performance of cooperative technology innovation in China’s resource-based enterprises.

Keywords

Resource-based enterprises Technological cooperation innovation Cooperation performance 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lyles MA, Baird IS (1994) Performance of international joint ventures in two Eastern European countries: The case of hungary and poland. Management Intenational Review 34(4):13–29Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mohr J, Sepkman R (1994) Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques. Strategic Management Journal 15(2):135–152Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lambe C, Sepkman R, Hunt S (2002) Alliance competence, resources, and alliance success: Conceptualization, measurement, and initial test. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science 30(2):141–157Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mitsuhashi H (2003) Effects of the social origins of alliances on alliance performance. Organization Studies 24(2):321–339Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wu Z, Mao N, Chen Y (2005) An empirical study of influence mechanism of the technological innovation cooperation performance between enterprises. Management World (9):99–106 (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    PanW(2006) Effect on cooperation performance by supply chain partners’ trust and promise. Psychological Science 29(6):1502–1506 (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ingham M, Mothe C (1998) How to learn in R&D partnerships? R&D Management 24(2):249–261Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Branstetter L, Sakakibara M (1998) Japanese research consortia: A microeconometric analysis of industrial policy. Journal of Industrial Economics 46(2):207–233Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bourche M (1999) Technology exchange in the information age—A guide to successful cooperative R&D partnerships. Journal Society of Research Administrators 31:37–40Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kumar P, Ghadially R (1989) Organizational politics and its effects on members of organizations. Human Relations 42(4):305–314Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Peteraf MA (1993) The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal 14(3):170–181Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Thomas M, Teece D (1990) Innovation and cooperation: Implications for competition and antitrust. The Journal of Economic perspectives 4(3):75–79Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wang F, Mao J (2010) Study on industrial technology chains and industrial upgrading. Journal of China University of Geosciences (Social Sciences Edition) 10(6):96–99 (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bonaceorsi A, Piccalugadu A (1994) A theoretical framework for the evaluation of universityindustry relationships. R&D Management 24(3):229–247Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cohen W, Levinthal D (1990) Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 35(1):128–152Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barclay I, Poolton J, Dann Z (1996) Improving competitive responsiveness via the virtual environment. Engineering and Technology Management 96:52–62Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hagedoom J (2002) Inter-firm R&D partnerships: An overview of major trends and patterns since 1960. Research Policy 31(4):477–492Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Luo W, Tang Y (2001) How to choose the organizational mode of cooperotive innovation. Studies In Science of Science 19(4):103–108 (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Williamson OE (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism firms markets relational contracting. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nonaka I, AbenM(2001) Making the most of your company’s knowledge: A strategic framework. Long Range Planning 34(4):421–439Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Xi Y (2000) Management Study. Machinery Industry Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Zhang Y, Liu Y, Li Y (2003) An analyse of value creation and distribution in the strategic alliance. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management 17(2):20–23Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Li Y (2010) A study on evaluation of sustainable growth capacity of resource-based firms. Doctoral Dissertation of China University of Geosciences (In Chinese)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Xie Y, Mei S, Zhong W (2011) An empirical study on influencing factors of industryuniversity-institute cooperation behavior and its mode selection. Science of Science and Management of S&T 3(32):35–43 (In Chinese)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business SchoolSichuan UniversityChengduPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations