Exploring Determinants of Knowledge Sharing in a Social Network of Practice

  • Jae Hwa Choi
  • Benjamin Lev
  • Hak-Lae Kim
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 241)

Abstract

Network of practice (NoP) operating on social media have been rapidly grown in recent years since the social media allows users not only to create contents, but also to interact with each other. A new type of NoP using social networking services (SNS) is defined as a social network of practice (sNoP). SNoP involves a collection of individuals who communicate, collaborate, and exchange knowledge openly with others sharing a common practice. Relatively little has been published focusing on the factors that influence the participation in knowledge sharing within the sNoP. This study focuses on the determinants of knowledge sharing in sNoP whose inquiry requires not only social theories, but also socio-technical views. Building on the social cognitive theory, the social capital theory, and the technology acceptance theory, this research-in-progress paper aims to explore how personal cognition, social capital, and technology acceptance attitude affect knowledge sharing in sNoP.

Keywords

Social network Network of practice Social network services Knowledge sharing 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Allen NJ, Meyer JP (1990) The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology 63(1):1–18Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Andrews DC (2002) Audience-specific online community design. Communications of the ACM 45(4):64–68Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bandura A (1989) Social cognitive theory. Annals of Child Development, JAI PressGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bross J, Sack H, Meinel C (2007) Encouraging participation in virtual communities: the “IT-summit-blog” case. In: Proceedings of IADIS E-Society2007, Lisbon, Portugal, July 5(2):113–129Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Butler B, Sproull L, Kiesler S et al (1989) Community effort in online groups: who does the work and why. Leadership at a Distance, Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers, Mahwah, NJGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen R (2013) Member use of social networking sites-an empirical examination. Decision Support Systems 54(3):1219–1227Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chen C, Hung S (2010) To give or to receive? Factors influencing members’ knowledge sharing and community promotion in professional virtual communities. Information & Management 47(4):226–236Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chiu C, Hsu M, Wang ETG (2006) Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision Support Systems 42(3):1872–1888Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Compeau D, Higgins C, Huff S (1999) Social cognitive theory and individual reactions to computing technology: a longitudinal study. MIS Quarterly 23(2):145–158Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 13(3):319–340Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Davis FD, Bagozzi RP,Warshaw PR (1992) Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 22(14):1111–1132Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gefen D (2000) E-commerce: the role of familiarity and trust. Omega: The International Journal of Management Science 28(6):725–737Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Heidemann J, Klier M, Probst F (2012) Online social networks: a survey of a global phenomenon. Computer Networks 56(18):3866–3878Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hsu CL, Lin JCC (2008) Acceptance of blog usage: the roles of technology acceptance, social influence and knowledge sharing motivation. Information & Management 45(1):65–74Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hu T, Kettinger WJ (2008) Why people continue to use social networking services: Developing a comprehensive model. In: Proceedings Of International Conference on Information SystemsGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jarvenpaa SL, Staples DD (2000) The use of collaborative electronic media for information sharing: an exploratory study of determinants. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems 9(2):129–154Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kankanhalli A, Tan BCY, Wei KK (2005) Contributing knowledge to electronic knowledge repositories: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly 29(1):113–143Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    King WR, Marks PV (2008) Motivating knowledge sharing through a knowledge management system. Omega: The International Journal of Management Science 36(1):131–146Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lu HP, Hsiao KL (2007) Understanding intention to continuously share information on weblogs. Internet Research 17(4):345–361Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mattson T (2012) Electronic NoP as Third Places: social embeddedness, membership longevity and contribution quality. In: Proceedings of AMCIS, JulyGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mayer RC, Davis JH, Schoorman FD (1995) An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review 20(3):709–734Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nahapiet J, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of management review 23(2):242–266Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Nov O (2007) What motivates wikipedians? Communications of the ACM 50(11):60–64Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Pajares F (2002) Overview of social cognitive theory and of self-efficacy. http://www.uky.edu/ eushe2/Pajares/eff.html
  25. 25.
    Papadopoulos T, Stamati T, Nopparuch P (2012) Exploring the determinants of knowledge sharing via employee weblogs. International Journal of Information Management 33(1):133–146Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Phang CW, Kankanhalli A, Sabherwal R (2009) Usability and sociability in online communities: a comparative study of knowledge seeking and contribution. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 10(10):721–747Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Richter D, Riemer K, vom Brocke J (2011) Internet social networking-research state of the art and implications for enterprise 2.0. Business and Information Systems Engineering 3(2):89–101Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Shen AXL, Cheung CMK, Lee MKO et al (2007) We-intention to use instant messaging for collaboration: a social influence model. In: 11th Pacific-Asia Conference on Information SystemsGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Teo TSH, Liu J (2007) Consumer trust in e-commerce in the United States, Singapore and China. Omega: The International Journal of Management Science 35(1):22–38Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tsai W, Ghoshal S (1998) Social capital and value creation: the role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal 41(4):464–476Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Teo TSH, Lim VKG, Lai RYC (1999) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage. Omega: The International Journal of Management Science 27(1):25–37Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wasko M, Faraj S, Teigland R (2004) Collective action and knowledge contribution in electronic NoP. Journal of Association for Information Systems 5(11/12):493Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Wasko M, Faraj S (2005) Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice. MIS Quarterly 29(1):35–57Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wang Y, Fesenmaier DR (1999) Understanding the motivation of contribution in online communities an empirical investigation of an online travel community. Electronic Markets 13(1):33–45Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wang S, Noe RA (2010) Knowledge sharing: a review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review 20(2):115–131Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Whelan E (2006) Exploring knowledge exchange in electronic networks of practice. Journal of Information Technology 22(1):5–12Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Wiertz C, de Ruyter K (2007) Beyond the call of duty: why customers contribute to firmhosted commercial online communities. Organization Studies 28(3):347–376Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Zhang H, Lv S (2013) Factors of successful relationship management: Guanxi in China. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Management Science and Engineering Management. Springer London 695–705Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Zhou T (2011) Understanding online community user participation: a social influence perspective. Internet Research 21(1):67–81Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jae Hwa Choi
    • 1
  • Benjamin Lev
    • 1
  • Hak-Lae Kim
    • 2
  1. 1.Decision Sciences Department, LeBow College of BusinessDrexel UniversityPhiladelphiaUSA
  2. 2.Samsung Electronics Co., LTD 416 Maetan-3dongYeongtong-gu Suwon-cityGyeonggi-doRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations