Integrating Safety Culture into OSH Risk Mitigation via Information Technologies

  • Dong Zhao
  • Yingbin Feng
  • Yincheng Ye
  • Min Jae Suh
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 241)


The occupational safety and health (OSH) risk management continues to be a key topic for worldwide industries, especially in the construction industry. Most of prior technologies were used to directly but passively impact safe working engineering in a technical way. However, technologies may also indirectly but actively influence workers’ safe performance in a managerial way. This research aimed to examine this severe safety problem in the construction industry, and taking which as an example, prevention measures for OSH risk mitigation are discussed. The analyses find that large portion of the OSH fatalities and injuries are related to workers’ unsafe acts and lack of awareness on the OSH hazards. The lack of effectiveness was ascribed the OSH training content as well as the one-off nature of construction industry. An innovative approach is proposed, which integrates the safety culture into the OSH risk mitigation via the application of cutting-edge information technologies. Particularly, a virtual reality-based pilot application which links the safety culture and risk mitigation is demonstrated.


Risk management Safety culture Construction Occupational safety and health 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Cawley JC, Homce GT (2008) Trends in electrical injury in the U.S., 1992-2002. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications 44:962–972Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Huang X, Hinze J (2003) Analysis of construction worker fall accidents. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 129:262–271Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ringen K, Stafford EJ (1996) Intervention research in occupational safety and health: Examples from construction. American Journal of Industrial Medicine 29:314–320Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Reason J (1998) Modelling the basic error tendencies of human operators. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 22:137–153Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Strauch B (2002) Investigating human error: Incidents, accidents and complex systems. Ashgate Pub Limited 344 D. Zhao & Y. Feng & et alGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dong XW, Men Y, Fujimoto A et al (2008) The construction chart book. USA, CPWR-The Center for Construction Research and TrainingGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Janicak CA 2008) Occupational fatalities due to electrocutions in the construction industry. Journal of Safety Research 39:617–621Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Garrett JW, Teizer J (2009) Human factors analysis classification system relating to human error awareness taxonomy in construction safety. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 135:754–763Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Rasmussen J (1997) Risk management in a dynamic society: A modelling problem. Safety Science 27:183–213Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reason J (1990) Human error. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK Read GJM, Lenn’e MG, Moss SA (2012) Associations between task, training and social environmental factors and error types involved in rail incidents and accidents. Accident AnalysisGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    & Prevention 48:416–422Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hobbs A, Kanki B G (2008) Patterns of error in confidential maintenance incident reports. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 18:5–16Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jaselskis EJ, Anderson SD, Russell JS (1996) Strategies for achieving excellence in construction safety performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management-Asce 122:61–70Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kamara JM, Augenbroe G, Anumba CJ et al (2002) Knowledge management in the architecture, engineering and construction industry. Construction Innovation (Sage Publications, Ltd.) 2:53Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhao D, Lucas J, Thabet W (2009) Using virtual enironments to support electrical safety awareness in construction. In: Proceedings of the 2009 Winter Simulation Conference, Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Goldenhar LM, Moran SK, Colligan M (2001) Health and safety training in a sample of open-shop construction companies. Journal of Safety Research 32:237–252Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Neville H (1998)Workplace accidents: They cost more than you might think. Industrial Management 40:7–9Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Toole T (1998) Uncertainty and home builders’ adoption of technological innovations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 124:323–332Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gann DM, Salter AJ (2000) Innovation in project-based, service-enhanced firms: The construction of complex products and systems. Research Policy 29:955–972Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    McCoy AP (2009) Towards Establishing an Innovativeness Index for Construction Sites. In: Construction Research Congress 91–100Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Yitmen I (2007) The challenge of change for innovation in construction: A North Cyprus perspective. Building and Environment 42:1319–1328Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Manseau A, Shields R (2005) Building tomorrow: Innovation in construction and engineering. Ashgate, Burlington, VTGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bourdieu P (2003) Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Haller M, Kurka G, Volkert J et al (1999) omVR-a safety training system for a virtual refinery. In: the ISMCR 99, Topical Workshop on Virtual Reality and Advanced Human-Robot Systems, Tokyo, JapanGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bowman DA, Kruijff E, Laviola JJ (2005) 3D user interfaces: Theory and practice. Pearson Education, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    McAlpine I, Stothard P (2003) Using multimedia technologies to support PBL for a course in 3D modeling for mining engineers. In: the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2003, Honolulu, Hawaii, USAGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Stanney K, Zyda M (2002) Virtual environments in the 21st Century. Mahwah. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Munro A, Breaux R, Patrey J et al (2002) Cognitive aspects of virtual evironments design. in Handbook of Virtual Environments: Design, Implementation, and Applications, In: Stanney K (ed.) Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ 415–434Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Trybus J (2008) Making safety second nature: Using simulation tools to practice safety. Process Safety Progress 54–55Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dong Zhao
    • 1
  • Yingbin Feng
    • 2
  • Yincheng Ye
    • 3
  • Min Jae Suh
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Building ConstructionVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA
  2. 2.School of Computing, Engineering and MathematicsUniversity of Western SydneySydneyAustralia
  3. 3.School of EducationVirginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA

Personalised recommendations