Skip to main content

Model Checking for Modal Dependence Logic: An Approach through Post’s Lattice

  • Conference paper
Logic, Language, Information, and Computation (WoLLIC 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8071))

Abstract

In this paper we investigate an extended version of modal dependence logic by allowing arbitrary Boolean connectives. Modal dependence logic was recently introduced by Jouko Väänänen by extending modal logic by a the dependence atom Dep(·). In this paper we study the computational complexity of the model checking problem. For a complete classification of arbitrary Boolean functions we are using a Lattice approach introduced by Emil Post. This classification is done for all fragments of the logical language allowing modalities \(\lozenge\) and □, the dependence atom, and logical symbols for arbitrary Boolean functions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bauland, M., Mundhenk, M., Schneider, T., Schnoor, H., Schnoor, I., Vollmer, H.: The tractability of model checking for LTL: The good, the bad, and the ugly fragments. ACM Trans. Comput. Log. 12(2), 26 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Böhler, E., Creignou, N., Reith, S., Vollmer, H.: Playing with Boolean blocks, part I: Post’s lattice with applications to complexity theory. SIGACT News 34(4), 38–52 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Buss, S.R.: The boolean formula value problem is in alogtime. In: Proceedings of the 19th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 123–131 (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ebbing, J., Lohmann, P.: Complexity of model checking for modal dependence logic. In: Bieliková, M., Friedrich, G., Gottlob, G., Katzenbeisser, S., Turán, G. (eds.) SOFSEM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7147, pp. 226–237. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Fischer, M.J., Ladner, R.E.: Propositional dynamic logic of regular programs. Journal of Computer and Systems Sciences 18(2), 194–211 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Hemaspaandra, E., Schnoor, H., Schnoor, I.: Generalized modal satisfiability. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 76(7), 561–578 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Ladner, R.E.: The computational complexity of provability in systems of modal propositional logic. SIAM J. Comput. 6(3), 467–480 (1977)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Lewis, H.R.: Satisfiability problems for propositional calculi. Mathematical Systems Theory 13, 45–53 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Lohmann, P., Vollmer, H.: Complexity results for modal dependence logic. In: Dawar, A., Veith, H. (eds.) CSL 2010. LNCS, vol. 6247, pp. 411–425. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Post, E.: The two-valued iterative systems of mathematical logic. Annals of Mathematical Studies 5, 1–122 (1941)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Sevenster, M.: Model-theoretic and computational properties of modal dependence logic. Journal of Logic and Computation 19(6), 1157–1173 (2009), http://logcom.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/exn102v1

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Thomas, M.: On the applicability of Post’s lattice. Inf. Process. Lett. 112(10), 386–391 (2012)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Väänänen, J.: Modal dependence logic. In: Apt, K.R., van Rooij, R. (eds.) New Perspectives on Games and Interaction, Texts in Logic and Games, vol. 4, pp. 237–254. Amsterdam University Press (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Müller, JS., Vollmer, H. (2013). Model Checking for Modal Dependence Logic: An Approach through Post’s Lattice. In: Libkin, L., Kohlenbach, U., de Queiroz, R. (eds) Logic, Language, Information, and Computation. WoLLIC 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8071. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39992-3_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39992-3_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39991-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39992-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics