Skip to main content

Extracting Reputation with Knock-Out Tournament-Based Pairwise Elicitation in Complex Social Networks

  • Conference paper
Agreement Technologies

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8068))

Abstract

Complex social networks are typically used in order to represent and structure social relationships that do not follow a predictable pattern of behaviour. Due to their openness and dynamics, participants in these networks have to constantly deal with uncertainty prior to commencing in any type of interaction. Reputation appears as a key concept helping users to mitigate such uncertainty. However, most of the reputation mechanisms proposed in the literature suffer from problems such as the subjectivity in the opinions and their inaccurate aggregation. With these problems in mind, this paper presents a decentralized reputation mechanism based on the concepts of pairwise elicitation processes and knock-out tournaments. The main objective of this mechanism is to build reputation rankings from qualitative opinions, so getting rid of the subjectivity problems associated with the aggregation of quantitative opinions. The proposed approach is evaluated in a real environment by using a dataset extracted from MovieLens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Altman, A., Tennenholtz, M.: Ranking systems: the pagerank axioms. In: Proceedings of the 6th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, EC 2005, pp. 1–8. ACM, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Balakrishnan, S., Chopra, S.: Two of a kind or the ratings game? adaptive pairwise preferences and latent factor models. In: Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, ICDM 2010, pp. 725–730. IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Brams, S.J., Fishburn, P.C.: Voting procedures. In: Arrow, K.J., Sen, A.K., Suzumura, K. (eds.) Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 1, ch.4, pp. 173–236. Elsevier (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Conitzer, V.: Eliciting single-peaked preferences using comparison queries. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, AAMAS 2007, pp. 65:1–65:8. ACM, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Conitzer, V., Rognlie, M., Xia, L.: Preference functions that score rankings and maximum likelihood estimation. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Joint Conference on Artifical Intelligence, IJCAI 2009, pp. 109–115. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fu, F., Hauert, C., Nowak, M.A., Wang, L.: Reputation-based partner choice promotes cooperation in social networks. Phys. Rev. E 78, 026117 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fullam, K.K., Barber, K.S.: Dynamically learning sources of trust information: experience vs. reputation. In: Proceedings of AAMAS 2007, pp. 1055–1062. ACM, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Järvelin, K., Kekäläinen, J.: Cumulated gain-based evaluation of ir techniques. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 20(4), 422–446 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Negahban, S., Oh, S., Shah, D.: Iterative ranking from pair-wise comparisons. CoRR, abs/1209.1688 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Pujol, J.M., Sangüesa, R., Delgado, J.: Extracting reputation in multi agent systems by means of social network topology. In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: Part 1, AAMAS 2002, pp. 467–474. ACM, New York (2002), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/544741.544853

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Raub, W., Weesie, J.: Reputation and efficiency in social interactions: An example of network effects. American Journal of Sociology 96, 626–654 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Resnick, P., Kuwabara, K., Zeckhauser, R., Friedman, E.: Reputation systems. Commun. ACM 43(12), 45–48 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vega-Redondo, F.: Complex Social Networks. Cambridge University Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Vu, T., Altman, A., Shoham, Y.: On the complexity of schedule control problems for knockout tournaments. In: Proceedings of AAMAS 2009, vol. 1, pp. 225–232. IFAAMAS, Richland (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vu, T., Shoham, Y.: Fair seeding in knockout tournaments. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 3(1), 9:1–9:17 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Centeno, R., Hermoso, R., Fasli, M. (2013). Extracting Reputation with Knock-Out Tournament-Based Pairwise Elicitation in Complex Social Networks. In: Chesñevar, C.I., Onaindia, E., Ossowski, S., Vouros, G. (eds) Agreement Technologies. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8068. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39860-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39860-5_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39859-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39860-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics