Participatory Policy Making in Practice: Simulating Boundary Work in Water Governance
Concerted and participative management has emerged in recent years in the French water policy to respond to the current projections of climate change, and an increasing demand for water in response to population growth. Therefore water management needs to move towards more sustainable practices.
In France decentralization caused legislative changes. The Water Act of 1992 and the establishment of SAGE (Local Water Management Plan) and river contracts have generated the need for people facilitating them. We consider here a new category of people named boundary worker which will be part of what some authors call intermediary people (Mauz, Granjou, Billaud, Moss, and Medd).
This new approach to public policies is not completely stabilized. Its implementations on the ground are very diverse. Little is known on their efficiency. Our work aims at providing means to improve the assessment of this aspect of participatory governance for public policies.
In this paper we propose a model to represent consequences of the involvement of a boundary worker in river basin governance, taking in account the context (social, institutional, physical) of this involvement. To achieve this we will particularly relate and articulate an analysis of several interviews with the boundaries worker.
Final aim of this model is exploration of various conditions of involvement of boundary workers and consequences on the evolution of socio-hydrosystems they are attached to.
KeywordsAgent-based modeling qualitative data boundary worker
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.Serra, R., Villani, M., Lane, D.: Modeling Innovation. Complexity Perspectives in Innovation and Social Change, 361–388 (2009)Google Scholar
- 2.Stringer, L.C., Dougill, A.J., Fraser, E., Hubacek, K., Prell, C., Reed, M.S.: Unpacking “participation” in the adaptive management of social–ecological systems: a critical review. Ecology and Society 11, 39 (2006)Google Scholar
- 3.Janssen, M.: Complexity and ecosystem management: the theory and practice of multi-agent systems. Edward Elgar Publishing (2002)Google Scholar
- 6.Lansing, J.S.: Anti-chaos, common property and the emergence of cooperation. In: Kohler, T., Gumerman, G. (eds.) Dynamics in Human and Primate Societies, pp. 207–223. Oxford University Press (1999)Google Scholar
- 10.Le Bars, M., Le Grusse, P.: Participative modelling of agricultural water demand at regional scale: an example in central Tunisia (2008)Google Scholar
- 11.Hoanh, C., Le Page, C., Barreteau, O., Trébuil, G., Bousquet, F., Cernesson, F., Barnaud, C., Gurung, T., Promburom, P., Naivinit, W.: Agent-based modeling to facilitate resilient water management in Southeast and South Asia. In: International Forum on Water and Food, pp. 10–14 (2008)Google Scholar
- 12.Moss, T., Medd, W., Guy, S., Marvin, S.: Organising water: The hidden role of intermediary work. Water Alternatives 2, 16–33 (2009)Google Scholar
- 14.Billaud, J.-P.: Ce que faciliter veut dire. A propos d’un retour d’expérience de chargés de mission Natura 2000. In: Remy, J., Brives, H., Lemery, B. (eds.) Conseillers en Agriculture. Educagri/INRA (2006)Google Scholar
- 16.Bousquet, F., Barreteau, O., Le Page, C., Mullon, C., Weber, J.: An environmental modelling approach: the use of multi-agent simulations. Advances in Environmental and Ecological Modelling 113, 122 (1999)Google Scholar
- 17.Étienne, M.: Companion modelling: a participatory approach to support sustainable development. La modélisation d’accompagnement: une démarche participative en appui au développement durable (2010)Google Scholar
- 18.Gilbert, N.: Quality, quantity and the third way. In: Holland, J., Campbell, J. (eds.) Methods in Development Research: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. ITDG Publications, London (2004)Google Scholar
- 19.Richard-Ferroudji, A.: Limites du modèle délibératif: composer avec différents formats de participation. Politix, 161–181 (2012)Google Scholar