IT Competence-Enabled Business Performance and Competitive Advantage

  • Maria N. Pérez-Aróstegui
  • Francisco J. Martínez-López
Chapter
Part of the Progress in IS book series (PROIS)

Abstract

Firms increasingly invest in Information Technology (IT) to achieve competitiveness to address turbulent and dynamic environment conditions. After an exhaustive literature review, this chapter aims at developing a framework to identify and analyze the relationships between a set of IT assets and IT capabilities, firm performance and the achievement of a sustainable competitive advantage. The findings suggest that IT investment by itself is unable to sustain a long-term competitive advantage, making it necessary to analyze the presence of resources that complement IT infrastructure to achieve better organizational performance. We thus stress the importance of studying the complementarity of IT resources in this relationship. This means that assessing both physical and managerial IT resources and other organizational resources in studying the relationship between IT and firm performance may provide better justification for IT spends.

Keywords

Information technology IT business value IT asets IT capabilities Resource-based view 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This article has had financial support from the Spanish Government (Ministry of Science and Innovation) and the European Union, research project ECO2010-15885.

References

  1. Albadvi, A., Keramati, A., & Razmi, J. (2007). Assessing the impact of information technology on firm performance considering the role of intervening variables: Organizational infrastructures and business processes reengineering. International Journal of Production Research, 45(12), 2697–2734.Google Scholar
  2. Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. (1993). Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 33–46.Google Scholar
  3. Armstrong, C. P., & Sambamurthy, And V. (1999). Information technology assimilation in firms: The influence of senior leaderships and IT infrastructures. Information Systems Research, 10(4), 304–327.Google Scholar
  4. Banker, R. D., Kalvenes, J., & Patterson, R. A. (2006). Information technology, contract completeness, and buyer-supplier relationships. Information Systems Research, 17(2), 180–193.Google Scholar
  5. Barney, J. B. (1986). Organizational culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 11(3), 656–665.Google Scholar
  6. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.Google Scholar
  7. Barney, J. B. (2001). Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Yes. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 41–59.Google Scholar
  8. Barua, A., Kriebel, C. H., & Mukhopadhyay, T. (1995). Information technologies and business value: An analytic and empirical investigation. Information Systems Research, 6(1), 3–23.Google Scholar
  9. Benítez-Amado, J., Lloréns-Montes, J., & Pérez-Aróstegui, M. N. (2010). Information technology-enabled entrepreneurship culture and firm performance. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 110(4), 550–566.Google Scholar
  10. Benjamin, R. I., & Levinson, E. (1993). A framework for managing IT-enabled change. Sloan Management Review, 34(4), 23–33.Google Scholar
  11. Bharadwaj, A. S., V. Sambamurthy, & Zmud. R.W. (1999). IT capabilities: Theoretical perspectives and empirical operationalization. In R. Hirschheim, M. Newman, J. I. Degross, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Information Systems (378–385) Helsinki, Finland.Google Scholar
  12. Bharadwaj, A. S. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169–196.Google Scholar
  13. Bharadwaj, A. S., Sambamurthy, V., & Zmud, R.W. (2002). Firmwide IT capability: An empirical examination of the construct and its links to performance. Working paper, Department of Decision and Information Analysis, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
  14. Bhatt, G. D., & Grover, V. (2005). Types of information technology capabilities and their role in competitive advantage: An empirical study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(2), 253–277.Google Scholar
  15. Black, J. A., & Boal, K. B. (1994). Strategic resources: Traits, configurations and paths to sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 131–148.Google Scholar
  16. Boar, B. (1994). Information technology and business alignment: A strategic assessment. In B. Voss & D. Willey (Eds.), Handbook of business strategy (pp. 173–188). New York: Faulkner and Gray.Google Scholar
  17. Boudreau, M., & Robey, D. (2005). Enacting integrated information technology: A human agency perspective. Organization Science, 16, 3–18.Google Scholar
  18. Broadbent, M., Weill, P., & Neo, B. S. (1999a). Strategic context and patterns of IT infrastructure capability. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 8(2), 157–187.Google Scholar
  19. Broadbent, M., Weill, P., & St.Clair, D. (1999b). The implications of information technology infrastructure for business process redesign. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 159–182.Google Scholar
  20. Brynjolfsson, E. (1993). The productivity paradox of IT. Communications of the ACM, 36(12), 66–67.Google Scholar
  21. Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. (1996). Paradox lost? Firm level evidence on the returns to information systems spending. Management Science, 42(4), 541–558.Google Scholar
  22. Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. (1998). Beyond the productivity paradox: Computers are the catalyst for bigger changes. Communications of the ACM, 41(8), 49–55.Google Scholar
  23. Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. (2000). Beyond computation: Information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 23–48.Google Scholar
  24. Brynjolfsson, E., Hitt, L., & Yang, S. (2002). Intangible assets: Computers and organizational capital. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Macroeconomics, 1, 137–199.Google Scholar
  25. Buday, R. (1986). Sabre gives the edge to American Airlines. Information Week (pp. 34–35).Google Scholar
  26. Byrd, T. A., & Turner, D. E. (2000). Measuring the flexibility of information technology infrastructure: Exploratory analysis of a construct. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(1), 167–208.Google Scholar
  27. Cagliano, R., & Spina, G. (2000). Advanced manufacturing technologies and strategically flexible production. Journal of Operations Management, 18(2), 169–190.Google Scholar
  28. Caldeira, M. M., & Ward, J. M. (2003). Using resource-based theory to interpret the successful adoption and use of information systems and technology in manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(2), 127–141.Google Scholar
  29. Clemons, E. K. (1986a). Information systems for sustainable competitive advantage. Information and Management, 11(3), 131–136.Google Scholar
  30. Clemons, E. K. & Kimbrough S.O. (1986, December). Information systems, telecommunications, and their effects on industrial organization. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference of Information Systems (99–108).Google Scholar
  31. Clemons, E. K. (1991). Corporate strategies for information technology: A resource-based approach. Computer, 24(11), 23–32.Google Scholar
  32. Clemons, E. K., & Row, M. C. (1987, December) Structural differences among firms: A potential source of competitive advantage in the application of information technology. In Proceedings VIII International Conference of Information Systems, (1–9).Google Scholar
  33. Clemons, E. K., & Row, M. C. (1991). Sustaining IT advantage: The role of structural differences. MIS Quarterly, 15(3), 275–292.Google Scholar
  34. Collis, D. J., & Montgomery, C. A. (1995). Competing on resources: Strategy in the 1990s. Harvard Business Review, 73(4), 118–128.Google Scholar
  35. Cooper, B. L., Watson, H. J., & Wimox, B. H. (2000). Data warehousing supports corporate strategy at first American corporation. MIS Quarterly, 24(2), 547–567.Google Scholar
  36. Crawford, J., Leonard, L. N. K., & Jones, K. (2011). The human resource’s influence in shaping IT competence. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 111(2), 164–183.Google Scholar
  37. Dehning, B., & Stratopoulos, T. (2003). Determinants of a sustainable competitive advantage due to an IT-enabled strategy. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 12(1), 7–28.Google Scholar
  38. Devaraj, S., & Kohli, R. (2003). Performance impacts of information technology: Is actual usage the missing link. Management Science, 49(3), 273–289.Google Scholar
  39. Dierickx, I., & Cool, K. (1989). Asset stock, accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage. Management Science, 35, 1504–1511.Google Scholar
  40. Dos Santos, B. L., Peffers, G. K., & Mauer, D. (1993). The impact of information technology investment announcements on the market value of the firm. Information Systems Research, 4(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
  41. Easterby-Smith, M., Crossban, M., & Nicolini, D. (2000). Organizational learning: Debates past, present and future. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 783–796.Google Scholar
  42. Feeny, D. F. (1988). Creating and sustaining competitive advantage with it, information management. In: The Strategic Dimension (pp. 98–117). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Feeny, D. F. (2001). Making business sense of the E-opportunity. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(2), 41–51.Google Scholar
  44. Feeny, D. F., & Ives, B. (1990). In search of sustainability: Reaping long-term advantage from investments in information technology. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(1), 24–46.Google Scholar
  45. Feeny, D. F., & Willcocks, L. P. (1998). Core IS capabilities for exploiting information technology. Sloan Management Review, 39(3), 9–21.Google Scholar
  46. Fernández Rodríguez, Z. (1993). La organización interna como ventaja competitiva para la empresa. Papeles de Economía Española, 56(1), 178–193.Google Scholar
  47. Freeman, C. (1991). The nature of innovation and the evolution of the productive system, en technology and productivity: The challenge for economic policy (pp. 303–314). Paris: OCDE.Google Scholar
  48. Gharajedaghi, J. (2006). Systems thinking: Managing chaos and complexity. San Diego: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  49. Grant, R. M. (1991). The resource-based theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation. California Management Review, 33(1), 114–135.Google Scholar
  50. Grant, R. M. (1992). Contemporary strategy analysis: Concepts, techniques, application. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  51. Grant, R.M. (1995). Dirección Estratégica: conceptos, técnicas y aplicaciones. Ed. Civitas, Madrid.Google Scholar
  52. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Jounal, 17, 109–122.Google Scholar
  53. Hall, R. (1992). The strategic analysis of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal, 13(2), 135–144.Google Scholar
  54. Hall, R. (1993). A framework linking intangible resources and capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 14(8), 607–618.Google Scholar
  55. Henderson, J., & Venkatraman, N. (1993). Strategic alignment: Leveraging information technology for transforming organizations. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 4–17.Google Scholar
  56. Hidding, G. (2001). Sustaining strategic IT advantage in the information age: How strategy paradigms differ by speed. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 10(September), 201–222.Google Scholar
  57. Hitt, L., & Brynjolfsson, E. (1996). Productivity, profit and consumer welfare: Three different measures of information technology’s value. MIS Quarterly, 4, 1–23.Google Scholar
  58. Itami, H. (1987). Mobilizing invisible assets. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  59. Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1998). An Information company in Mexico: Extending the resource-based view of the firm to a developing country context. Information Systems Research, 9(4), 342–361.Google Scholar
  60. Keen, P. G. W. (1993). Information technology and the management difference: A fusion map. IBM Systems Journal, 32(1), 17–39.Google Scholar
  61. Kettinger, W., Grover, V., Guha, S., & Segars, A. (1994). Strategic information systems revisited: A study in sustainability and performance. MIS Quarterly, 18(1), 31–58.Google Scholar
  62. Kohli, R., & Grover, V. (2008). Business value of IT: An essay on expanding research directions to keep up with the times. Journal of the AIS, 9(1), 23–37.Google Scholar
  63. Lee, S. M., Kim, K., Paulson, P., & Park, H. (2008). Developing a socio-technical framework for business-IT alignment. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 108(9), 1167–1181.Google Scholar
  64. Levy, Y., & Ellis, T. J. (2006). A systems approach to conduct an effective literature review in support of information systems research. Informing Science Journal, 9, 181–212.Google Scholar
  65. Li, M., & Ye, L. R. (1999). Information technology and firm performance: Linking with environmental. Strategic and managerial contexts. Information and Management, 35(1), 43–51.Google Scholar
  66. Lieberman, M. B., & Montgomery, D. B. (1988). First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, 9, 41–58.Google Scholar
  67. Lindbeck, A. (1991). Lessons from the conference, en technology and productivity: The challenge for economic policy (pp. 13–15). Paris: OCDE.Google Scholar
  68. Lippman, S., & Rumelt, R. (1982). Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. Bell Journal of Economics, 13, 418–438.Google Scholar
  69. Lucas, H. C. (1993). The business value of information technology: A historical perspective and thoughts for future research, en strategic information technology management: Perspectives on organizational growth and competitive advantage. In R. Banker, R. Kauffman, M.A. Mahmood, (Eds.), Idea Group Publishing, Harrisburg.Google Scholar
  70. Lucas, H. C. (1999). Information technology and the productivity paradox: Assessing the value of investing in IT. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  71. Mata, F. J., Fuerst, W. L., & Barney, J. B. (1995). Information technology and sustained competitive advantage: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 19(4), 487–505.Google Scholar
  72. McFarland, F. W. (1984). Information technology changes the way you compete. Harvard Business Review, 59(5), 98–103.Google Scholar
  73. Melville, N., Kraemer, K., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Review: Information technology and organizational performance: An integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 283–322.Google Scholar
  74. Mooney, J. G., V. Gurbaxani, & Kraemer, K. L. (1995). A process oriented framework for assessing the business value of information technology. In Degross, J. I., et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 17–27). Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  75. Navas, J.E. (1994). Organización de Empresas y Nuevas Tecnologías, Ed. Pirámide, Madrid.Google Scholar
  76. Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Nevo, S., & Wade, M. R. (2010). The formation and value of IT-enabled resources: Antecedents and consequences of synergistic relationships. MIS Quarterly, 34(1), 163–183.Google Scholar
  78. Oh, W., & Pinsonneault, A. (2007). On the assessment of the strategic value of information technologies: Conceptual and analytical approaches. MIS Quarterly, 31(2), 239–265.Google Scholar
  79. Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2006). From IT leveraging competence to competitive advantage in turbulent environments: The case of new product development. Information Systems Research, 17(3), 198–227.Google Scholar
  80. Pemberton, J. D., Stonehouse, G. H., & Barber, C. E. (2001). Competing with CRS-generated information in the airline industry. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 10(1), 59–75.Google Scholar
  81. Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  82. Pérez-Aróstegui, M. N., Benítez-Amado, J., & Tamayo-Torres, J. (2012). Information technology-enabled quality performance: An exploratory study. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 112(3), 502–518.Google Scholar
  83. Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3), 179–191.Google Scholar
  84. Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2005). Review: IT-dependent strategic initiatives and sustained competitive advantage: A review and synthesis of the literature. MIS Quarterly, 29(4), 747–776.Google Scholar
  85. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy: Techniques for analyzing industries and competitors. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  86. Powell, T. C., & Dent-Micallef, A. (1997). Information technology as competitive advantage: The role of human, business, and technology resources. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), 375–405.Google Scholar
  87. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 79–92.Google Scholar
  88. Ravichandran, T., Lertwongsatien, C. (2002). Impact of information systems resources and capabilities on firm performance: A resource-based perspective. In L. M. Applegate, R. Galliers, J.I. Degross, (Eds.), Proceedings of 23rd International Conference on Information Systems (pp. 577–582). Barcelona, Spain.Google Scholar
  89. Ravidhandran, T., & Lertwongsatien, C. (2005). Effect of information systems resources and capabilities on firm performance: A resource-based perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(4), 237–276.Google Scholar
  90. Ray, G., Muhanna, W., & Barney, J. B. (2005). Information technology and the performance of the customer service process: A resource-based analysis. MIS Quarterly, 29(4), 625–652.Google Scholar
  91. Reed, R., & DeFillipi, R. J. (1990). Casual ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 15, 88–102.Google Scholar
  92. Ross, J. W., & Beath, C. M. (2002). New approaches to IT investment. MIT Sloan Management Review, 43(2), 51–59.Google Scholar
  93. Ross, J. W., Beath, C. M., & Goodhue, D. L. (1996). Develop long-term competitiveness through IT assets. Sloan Management Review, 38(1), 31–42.Google Scholar
  94. Rumelt, R. P. (1984). Towards a strategic theory of the firm. In R. Lamb (Ed.), Competitive stratagic management (pp. 556–570). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  95. Sager, M. (1988). Competitive information systems in Australian Retail Banking. Information and Management, 15(1), 59–67.Google Scholar
  96. Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 237–263.Google Scholar
  97. Santhaman, R., & Hartono, E. (2003). Issues in linking information technology capability to firm performance. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 125–153.Google Scholar
  98. Sher, P. J., & Lee, V. C. (2004). Information technology as a facilitator for enhancing dynamic capabilities through knowledge management. Information and Management, 41(8), 933–945.Google Scholar
  99. Silverman, B. S. (1999). Technological resources and the direction of corporate diversification: Toward an integration of the resource-based view and transaction cost economics. Management Science, 45(8), 1109–1124.Google Scholar
  100. Tanriverdi, H. (2005). Information technology relatedness, knowledge management capability, and performance of multibusiness firms. MIS Quarterly, 29(2), 311–334.Google Scholar
  101. Tanriverdi, H. (2006). Performance effects on information technology synergies in multibusiness firms. MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 57–77.Google Scholar
  102. Teece, D. J. (1986). Firm boundaries, technological innovation and strategic planning. In G. L. Thomas (Ed.), The economics of strategic planning (pp. 187–199). Lexington: D. C. Heath.Google Scholar
  103. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533.Google Scholar
  104. Teo, T. S. H., & Ranganathan, C. (2003). Leveraging IT resources and capabilities at the housing and development board. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 12(3), 229–249.Google Scholar
  105. Tippins, M. J., & Sohi, R. S. (2003). IT competency and firm performance: Is organizational learning a missing link? Strategic Management Journal, 24(8), 745–761.Google Scholar
  106. Uhl-Bien, M., Marion, R., & McKelvey, B. (2007). Complexity leadership theory: Shifting leadership from the industrial age to the knowledge era. The Leadership Quarterly, 18(4), 298–318.Google Scholar
  107. Venkatraman, N., & Zaheer, A. (1990). Electronic integration and strategic advantage: Quasi-experimental study in the insurance industry. Information Systems Research, 1(4), 377–393.Google Scholar
  108. Wade, M., & Hulland, J. (2004). Review: The resource-based view and information systems research: Review, extension, and suggestions for future research. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 107–142.Google Scholar
  109. Warner, T. N. (1987). Information technology as a competitive burden. Sloan Management Review, 29(1), 55–61.Google Scholar
  110. Webster, J., & Watson, R. T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii.Google Scholar
  111. Weill, P. (1992). The relationship between investment in IT and firm performance: A study of the valve manufacturing sector. Information Systems Research, 3(4), 307–333.Google Scholar
  112. Weill, P., Broadbent, M., & Butler, C. (1996). Exploring how firms view IT infrastructure. Working Paper, The University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
  113. Weill, P., Subramani, M., & Broadbent, M. (2002). Building IT infrastructure for strategic agility. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(1), 57–65.Google Scholar
  114. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(2), 171–180.Google Scholar
  115. Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22, 233–261.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria N. Pérez-Aróstegui
    • 1
  • Francisco J. Martínez-López
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Business AdministrationUniversity of GranadaGranadaSpain
  2. 2.Department of Business AdministrationUniversity of Granada, Spain; and Marketing Group, Open University of CataloniaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations