Skip to main content

The Pervasive Influence of Electronic Word of Mouth (eWOM) on Today’s Social Consumer

Part of the Progress in IS book series (PROIS)

Abstract

Social networking sites (SNSs) are a booming worldwide phenomenon with enormous business potential for companies to communicate with their target-audience consumers and spread their brand-related messages. One of the notable distinguishing characteristics of SNSs, when compared to previous Web 1.0-based communication tools, is the active role that consumers play in the communication process with companies and, even more importantly, with other consumers. SNSs provide a setting where commentaries, analyses and recommendations about brands, products and services are communicated. EWOM is a unique and powerful consequence of SNSs. In this chapter, we perform a conceptual analysis of eWOM, of the motivations for engaging in it and of its effects on consumers’ behavior, paying special attention to the type of eWOM that takes place in SNSs. Finally, some relevant managerial implications and research opportunities are discussed.

Keywords

  • WOM
  • eWOM
  • Motivations
  • Effects in consumers’ behavior
  • Social networks

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-39747-9_34
  • Chapter length: 19 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-642-39747-9
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   349.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)

References

  • Andersen, P. H. (2005). Relationship marketing and brand involvement of professionals through web-enhanced brand communities: The case of Coloplast. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(1), 39–51.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bagherjeiran, A., Bhatt, R. P., Parekh, R., & Chaoji, V. (2010). Online advertising in social networks. Springer Science+Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balasubramanian, S., & Mahajan, V. (2001). The economic leverage of the virtual community. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5, 103–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, R. D., Miniard, P. W., & Engel, J. F. (2005). Word-of-Mouth Influence. Consumer Behavior (010 ed., pp. 728–730). South-Western College Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonds-Raacke, J., & Raacke, J. (2010). MySpace and Facebook: Identifying dimensions of uses and gratifications for friend networking sites. Individual Differences Research, 8(1), 27–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1). Retrieved September 30, 2011, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html#references

  • Brown, J. J., & Reingen, P. H. (1987a). Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 350–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. J., Barry, T. E., Dacin, P. A., & Gunst, R. F. (2005). Spreading the word: Investigating antecedents of consumers’ positive word-of-mouth intentions and behaviors in a retailing context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(2), 123–138.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, W. (2009). The moderating effects of perceived risk and product involvement towards satisfaction and online Word-of-Mouth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, X., & Zhou, M. (2010). Study on effect of ewom: A literature review and suggestions for future research. Management and Service Science (MASS), International Conference on 2010 (pp. 1–4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, C.M.K., & Thadani, D. R. (2010). The effectiveness of electronic Word-of-Mouth communication: A literature analysis. 23rd Bled eConference eTrust: Implications for the individual, enterprises and society, Bled, Slovenia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, C. M. K., & Thadani, D. R. (2012). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth communication: A literature analysis and integrative model. Decision Support Systems, 54(1), 461–470.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, C. M. K., Lee, M., & Thadani, D. (2009). The impact of positive electronic word-of-mouth on consumer online purchasing decision. Visioning and engineering the knowledge society. A Web Science Perspective, 501–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier, J. A., & Mayzlin, D. (2006). The effect of word of mouth on sales: Online book reviews. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(3), 345–354.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chien-Huang, L., Ya-Chung, S., Yueh-Chiang, L., and Shih-Chia, W. (2007). How instant messaging affects the satisfaction of virtual interpersonal behavior of taiwan junior high school students. Adolescence, 42(166), 417–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chu, S.-C., & Choi, S. M. (2011). Electronic Word-of-Mouth in social networking sites: A cross-cultural study of the United States and China. Journal of Global Marketing, 24(3), 263–281.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, S.-C., & Kim, Y. (2011). Determinants of consumer engagement in electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites. International Journal of Advertising, 30(1), 47–75.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • De Matos, C. A., & Rossi, C. A. V. (2008). Word-of-mouth communications in marketing: a meta-analytic review of the antecedents and moderators. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 36(4), 578–596.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dellarocas, C., Zhang, X (Michael), & Awad, N. F. (2007). Exploring the value of online product reviews in forecasting sales: The case of motion pictures. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(4), 23–45.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dichter, E. (1966). How word-of-mouth advertising works. Harvard Business Review, 44(6), 147–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doh, S.-J., & Hwang, J.-S. (2009). How consumers evaluate eWOM (electronic Word-of-Mouth) messages. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 12(2), 193–197.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, P. (2007). Measuring the value of electronic word of mouth and its impact in consumer communities. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 21(2), 63–79.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Garrigos-Simon, F. J., Alcamí, R. L., and Ribera, T. B. (2012). Social networks and Web 3.0: Their impact on the management and marketing of organizations. Management Decision, 50(10), 1880–1890.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gathright, G., & Wignall, C. D. (2009). Word-of-Mouth learning in social networks. Landscape (pp. 1–25). Presented at the ASREC09. Retrieved from http://www.thearda.com/asrec/archive/papers/Gathright-Wignall%20-%20Social%20Networks%20-%20ASREC09.pdf

  • Gilly, M. C., Graham, J. L., Wolfinbarger, M. F., & Yale, L. J. (1998). A dyadic study of interpersonal information search. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26(2), 83–100.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Goldsmith, R. E., & Horowitz, D. (2006). Measuring motivations for online opinion seeking. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 6(2), 1–16.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gruen, T. W., Osmonbekov, T., & Czaplewski, A. J. (2006). eWOM: The impact of customer-to-customer online know-how exchange on customer value and loyalty. Journal of Business Research, 59(4), 449–456.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Guadagno, R. E., & Cialdini, R. B. (2005). Online persuasion and compliance: Social influence on the Internet and beyond. New York: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/summary?doi=10.1.1.2.6571

  • Gupta, P., & Harris, J. (2010). How e-WOM recommendations influence product consideration and quality of choice: A motivation to process information perspective. Journal of Business Research, 63(9), 1041–1049.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Heitmann, M., Lehmann, D. R., & Herrmann, A. (2007). Choice goal attainment and decision and consumption satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 234–250.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (1995). Economic growth and social capital in Italy. Eastern Economic Journal, 21(3), 295–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig-Thurau, T., Walsh, G., & Walsh, G. (2003). Electronic word-of-mouth: Motives for and consequences of reading customer articulations on the Internet. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 8(2), 51–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennig-Thurau, T., Gwinner, K. P., Walsh, G., & Gremler, D. D. (2004). Electronic word-of-mouth via consumer-opinion platforms: What motivates consumers to articulate themselves on the Internet? Journal of interactive marketing, 18(1), 38–52.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, J. K., Hsieh, Y. C., & Tang, Y. C. (2012). Exploring the disseminating behaviors of eWOM marketing: persuasion in online video. Electronic Commerce Research, 17 March 2012, 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, K. H., & Li, S. Y. (2010). The influence of eWOM on virtual consumer communities: Social capital, consumer learning, and behavioral outcomes. Journal of Advertising Research, 47(4), 485.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, B. J., Zhang, M., Sobel, K., & Chowdury, A. (2009). Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(11), 2169–2188.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., & Lee, J.-N. (2009). Understanding the product information inference process in electronic word-of-mouth: An objectivity-subjectivity dichotomy perspective. Information and Management, 46(5), 302–311.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M., & Youn, S. (2009). Electronic word of mouth (eWOM). International Journal of Advertising, 28(3), 473–499.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J., Park, D.-H., & Han, I. (2008). The effect of negative online consumer reviews on product attitude: An information processing view. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(3), 341–352.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M., Rodgers, S., & Kima, M. (2009). Effects of valence and extremity of eWOM on attitude toward the Brand and Website. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 31(2), 1–11.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D., Kim, H. S., & Kim, J. K. (2012). The role of self-construal in consumers’ electronic word of mouth (eWOM) in social networking sites: A social cognitive approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(3), 1054–1062.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Leivadiotou, E., & Markopoulos, D. (2010). Cyber communities and electronic Word-of-Mouth: The use of facebook in the promotion of hospitality services. MIBES Transactions, 4(1), 138–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangold, W. G., & Faulds, D. J. (2009). Social media: The new hybrid element of the promotion mix. Business Horizons, 52(4), 357–365.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mittal, V., Huppertz, J. W., & Khare, A. (2008). Customer complaining: The role of tie strength and information control. Journal of Retailing, 84(2), 195–204.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, C., Zaltman, G., & Deshpande, R. (1992). Relationships between providers and users of market research: the dynamics of trust within and between organizations. Journal of Marketing Research, 29(3), 314–328.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, C., Deshpande, R., & Zaltman, G. (1993). Factors affecting trust in market research relationships. The Journal of Marketing, 57(1), 81–101.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Park, D. H., & Kim, S. (2008). The effects of consumer knowledge on message processing of electronic word-of-mouth via online consumer reviews. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(4), 399–410.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C., & Lee, T. M. (2009). Information direction, website reputation and eWOM effect: A moderating role of product type. Journal of Business Research, 62(1), 61–67.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps, J. E., Lewis, R., Mobilio, L., Perry, D., & Raman, N. (2004). Viral marketing or electronic word-of-mouth advertising: examining consumer responses and motivations to pass along email. Journal of Advertising Research, 44(4), 333–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pigg, K. E., & Crank, L. D. (2004). Building community social capital: The potential and promise of information and communications technologies. The Journal of Community Informatics, 1(1), 58–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Probst, F. (2011). Predicting users’ future level of communication activity in online social networks: A first step towards more advertising effectiveness. AMCIS (p. 39). Presented at the Proceedings of the 17th Americas Conference on Information Systems, Detroit, Michigan: University of Augsburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raacke, J., & Bonds-Raacke, J. (2008). MySpace and Facebook: Applying the uses and gratifications theory to exploring friend-networking sites. Cyberpsychology and Behavior, 11(2), 169–174.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Riegner, C. (2007). Word of mouth on the web: The impact of Web 2.0 on consumer purchase decisions. Journal of Advertising Research, 47(4), 436–447.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M., & Bhowmik, D. K. (1970). Homophily-heterophily: Relational concepts for communication research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34(4), 523–538.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, S. S. (2011). Exploring the propensity to share product information on social networks, University of Minnesota. Retrieved from http://purl.umn.edu/117151

  • Sen, S. (2008). Determinants of consumer trust of virtual Word-of-Mouth: An observation study from a retail website. Journal of American Academy of Business, 14(1), 30. Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, R. S., & Pandey, T. (2011). The impact of electronic word-of-mouth in the distribution of digital goods. Webology, 8(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, D. H. (2008). Understanding purchasing behaviors in a virtual economy: Consumer behavior involving virtual currency in Web 2.0 communities. Interacting with Computers, 20(4–5), 433–446.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. B., & Bristor, J. M. (1994). Uncertainty orientation: Expalaining diffeerences in purchase involvement and external search. Psychology and Marketing, 11(6), 587–607.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T., Coyle, J. R., Lightfoot, E., & Scott, A. (2007). Reconsidering models of influence: The relationship between consumer social networks and Word-of-Mouth effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research, 47(4), 387–397.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Stockman, S. (2010). Advertising in online social networks: A comprehensive overview. Honors scholar theses. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.uconn.edu/srhonors_theses/168

  • Strutton, D., Taylor, D. G., & Thompson, K. (2011). Investigating generational differences in e-WOM behaviours. International Journal of Advertising, 30(4), 559–586.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, T., Youn, S., Wu, G., & Kuntaraporn, M. (2006). Online Word-of-Mouth (or Mouse): An exploration of its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(4), 1104–1127.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Sundaram, D. S., Mitra, K., & Webster, C. (1998). Word-of-mouth communications: A motivational analysis. Advances in Consumer Research, 25(1), 527–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Susarla, A., Oh, J., and Tan, Y. (2010). Word of mouth dynamics in online social networks: Investigating social influence cascades on YouTube. WISE 2010, (Work in Progress).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney, J. C., Soutar, G. N., & Mazzarol, T. (2008). Factors influencing word of mouth effectiveness: receiver perspectives. European Journal of Marketing, 42(3/4), 344–364.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Thelwall, M., Wilkinson, D., & Uppal, S. (2010). Data mining emotion in social network communication: Gender differences in MySpace. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 190–199.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tong, W. U., & Yang, X. (2010). Electronic word of mouth in online social networks. Second International Conference on Communication Systems Networks and Applications, 2010, 249–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trusov, M., Bucklin, R. E., & Pauwels, K. (2009). Effects of Word-of-Mouth versus traditional marketing: findings from an internet social networking site. Journal of Marketing, 73(5), 90–102.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Urbany, J. E., Dickson, P. R., & Wilkie, W. L. (1989). Buyer uncertainty and information search. Journal of Consumer Research, 208–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollmer, C., & Precourt, G. (2008). Always on: Advertising, marketing and media in an era of consumer control. McGraw-Hill Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, K.-Y., Thongpapanl, N., Wu, H.-J., & Ting, I.-H. (2011). Identifying structural heterogeneities between online social networks for effective word-of-mouth marketing. International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining, 2011, 418–422.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wangenheim, F. V. (2005). Postswitching negative word of mouth. Journal of Service Research, 8(1), 67–78.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wixom, B.H., Todd, P.A. (2005), "A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance". Information Systems Research, 16(1), 85–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • WOMMA. (2012). WOM definition. http://www.wommapedia.org/ Retrieved from http://www.wommapedia.org/

  • Wu, P. C. S., & Wang, Y.-C. (2011). The influences of electronic word-of-mouth message appeal and message source credibility on brand attitude. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 23(4), 448–472.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Xingyuan, W., Li, F., & Wei, Y. (2010). How do they really help? An empirical study of the role of different information sources in building brand trust. Journal of Global Marketing, 23(3), 243–252.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M., Jansen, B. J., & Chowdhury, A. (2011). Business engagement on Twitter: a path analysis. Electronic Markets, 21(3), 161–175.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, F., & Zhang, X. (Michael) (2010). Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: The moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 133–148.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Research Project ECO2012-31712 under Subprogram for Non-Oriented Fundamental Research Projects, Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Spain for their financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francisco Rejón-Guardia .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rejón-Guardia, F., Martínez-López, F.J. (2014). The Pervasive Influence of Electronic Word of Mouth (eWOM) on Today’s Social Consumer. In: Martínez-López, F. (eds) Handbook of Strategic e-Business Management. Progress in IS. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39747-9_34

Download citation