Rethinking Social CRM Design: A Service-Dominant Logic Perspective

Chapter
Part of the Progress in IS book series (PROIS)

Abstract

The rapid rise of powerful social customers has drastically changed the e-business landscape. Social CRM (SCRM) emerged in late 2009 as an e-business strategy for companies to enable customer relationship management (with social customers) utilizing social technology. Despite the many applications that are labeled as SCRM, there is a dearth of guidelines for SCRM design and development. Many companies are trapped using social media as just another communication channel, and have naively applied traditional Electronic CRM (ECRM) practices on social platforms based on a model of exchange that centers on goods (e.g., goods-dominant logic or G-D logic), with value created by the firm and relationship implying multiple transactions of value-laden output. G-D logic might have served companies in the pre-Web 2.0 environment in which the interaction with customers could be contained in one-to-one, closed, well-defined channels. However, in a collaborative open, social environment in which interactions cannot be contained and are often unpredictable, this firm-centric, transaction-oriented approach is at odds with how social customers behave and expect, and therefore becomes inadequate in fostering true relationships that cultivate devoted advocates and brand co-creators. In this chapter, we offer an alternative logic called service-dominant (S-D) logic for SCRM design to meet new challenges. S-D logic is based on the reciprocal application of applied competences (service), which sees relationship in terms of co-creation of value. We argue that the S-D logic perspective for SCRM is appropriate, if not essential. We offer S-D logic-informed strategies for SCRM and next-generation CRM system design.

Keywords

Social CRM Service-dominant logic Electronic customer relationship management CRM ECRM Web 2.0 Crowd sourcing Resource integration 

References

  1. Berry, L. L. (1983). Relationship marketing. In L. L. Berry, G. L. Shostack, & G. D. Upah (Eds.), Emerging perspectives in services marketing (pp. 25–38). Chicago: American Marketing Association.Google Scholar
  2. Chen, H. -M. (2008). Towards service engineering: Service orientation and business-IT alignment. Proceedings of IEEE Hawaii International Conference on System Science (HICSS-41), Hawaii, January 7–10.Google Scholar
  3. Chen, Q., & Chen, H.-M. (2004). Exploring the success factors of eCRM strategies in practice. Journal of Database Marketing and Customer Strategy Management, 11(4), 333–343.Google Scholar
  4. Forrester Report. (2010, January). Topic overview: Social CRM goes mainstream.Google Scholar
  5. Chen, H.-M., & Vargo, S. L. (2008). Toward an alternate logic for electronic customer relationship management. International Journal of Business Environment, 2(2), 116–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Greenberg, P. (2010). Social CRM? Really? REALLY?. MyCustomer.com. Retrieved February 2012, http://www.mycustomer.com/topic/social-crm/paul-greenberg-social-crm-really–really/115290
  7. Gummesson, E. (2006). Many-to-many marketing as grand theory. In R. F. Lush, & S. L. Vargo (Eds.), The service-dominant logic of marketing. New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc. (Chapter 27).Google Scholar
  8. Huffington Post. (2011). ‘United Breaks Guitars’: Did it really cost the airline $180 million? Retrieved November 12, 2012, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/07/24/united-breaks-guitars-did_n_244357.html
  9. Huffington Post. (2012). #McDStories, McDonald’s Twitter hashtag promotion, goes horribly wrong. Retrieved November 12, 2012, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/23/mcdstories-twitter-hashtag_n_1223678.html
  10. Hunt, S. D. (2004). A general theory of competition: resources, competences, productivity, and economic growth. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  11. Jaworski, B., & Kohli, A. (2006). Co-creating the voice of the customer. In R. F. Lush, & S. L. Vargo (Eds), The service-dominant logic of marketing. New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc. (Chapter 8).Google Scholar
  12. Kale, S. H. (2004, September–October). CRM failure and the seven deadly sins. Marketing Management, 13, 42–46.Google Scholar
  13. Kazman, R., & Chen, H.-M. (2009). The metropolis model: A new logic for the development of crowdsourced systems. Communications of the ACM, 52(7), 76–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lusch, R. L. & Vargo, S. L. (2014), Service-dominant logic: Premises, prospects, possibilities, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. MicroStrategy, Inc. (2001). The power of eCRM. www.microstrategy.com/ecrmwhitepaper
  16. Mitussis, D., O’Malley, L., & Patterson, M. (2006). Mapping the re-engagement of CRM with relationship marketing. European Journal of Marketing, 40(5/6), 572–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Newell, F. (2003). Why CRM doesn't work: How to win by letting customers manage the relationship. Bloomberg Press.Google Scholar
  18. Normann, R. (2001). Reframing business: when the map changes the landscape. Chichester, New Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. O’Malley, L., & Mitussis, D. (2002). Relationships and technology: Strategic implications. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 10(3), 225–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Peppers, D., & Rogers, M. (2004). Managing customer relationship: A strategic framework. Hoboken, New Jersey: Wiley.Google Scholar
  21. Rust, R. T., Lemon, K. N., & Zeithaml, V. A. (2004). Return on marketing: Using customer equity to focus marketing strategy. Journal of Marketing, 68, 109–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ryals, L., & Payne, A. (2001). Customer relationship management in financial services: Towards information-enabled relationship marketing. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 9, 1–25.Google Scholar
  23. Smith, S., & Wheeler, J. (2002). Managing the customer experience: Turning customers into advocates. FT Press.Google Scholar
  24. Vargo, S. L. (2009). Toward a transcending conceptualization of relationship: A service-dominant logic perspective. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 24(5/6), 373–379.Google Scholar
  25. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004, January). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68, 1–17.Google Scholar
  26. Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2006). Service-dominant logic: What it is, what it is not, what it might be. In R. F. Lusch & S. L. Vargo (Eds.), The service-dominant logic of marketing: Dialog, debate and directions (pp. 43–56). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.Google Scholar
  27. Vargo, S. L. & Lusch, R. F. (2008). Service-dominant logic: Continuing the evolution. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. Google Scholar
  28. Vargo, S. L., Lusch, R. F., Akaka, M. A., & He, Y. (2008). The service-dominant logic of marketing: Progress and prospects. Review of Marketing Research.Google Scholar
  29. Webster, F. J. (1992). The Changing Role of Marketing in the Corporation. Journal of Marketing, 56, 1–17.Google Scholar
  30. Woodruff, R. B., & Flint, D. F. (2006). Marketing’s service dominant logic and customer value. In R. F. Lush & S. L. Vargo (Eds.), The service-dominant logic of marketing. New York: M.E. Sharpe, Inc. (Chapter 14).Google Scholar
  31. Zuboff, S., & Maxmin, J. (2002). The support economy. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Information Technology ManagementShidler College of Business, University of Hawaii at ManoaHonoluluUSA
  2. 2.MarketingShidler College of Business, University of Hawaii at ManoaHonoluluUSA

Personalised recommendations