Online Advertising Intrusiveness and Consumers’ Avoidance Behaviors

  • Francisco Rejón-GuardiaEmail author
  • Francisco J. Martínez-López
Part of the Progress in IS book series (PROIS)


The proliferation of advertising in all communication media causes consumers to perceive a significant amount of competitiveness between advertised products, as well as to feel overwhelmed by the intrusiveness of their advertisements. When taken together, these dimensions form the concept “advertising clutter.” A review of the literature shows that perceived intrusiveness is the main component of the perception of clutter. Advertising clutter can prompt undesired behaviors (e.g., advertising avoidance) as well as attitudes contrary to those that companies’ advertising campaigns hope to achieve. It also leads to diminished advertising efficacy in terms of consumer memory, a decrease in positive attitudes towards the message and brand, as well as declined purchasing intention and, therefore, sales. In this article, the main consequences of advertising clutter for consumers in online media are reviewed and discussed. To that end, a theoretical review of this concept and its main dimensions is performed; special attention is paid to the online context. Finally, some practical recommendations and research opportunities are pointed out.


Intrusiveness Online advertising clutter Irritation Avoidance 



The authors would like to thank the Research Project ECO2012-31712 under Subprogram for Non-Oriented Fundamental Research Projects, Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Spain for their financial support.


  1. Aaker, D. A., & Bruzzone, D. E. (1985). Causes of irritation in advertising. Journal of Marketing, 49(2), 47–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abernethy, A. M. (1991). Physical and mechanical avoidance ot television commercials: an exploratory study of zipping, zapping and leaving. Proceedings presented at the proceedings of the American academy of advertising.Google Scholar
  3. Batra, R., & Ray, M. L. (1986). Affective responses mediating acceptance of advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(2), 234–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bellamy, R. V., Walker, J. R. (1996). Television and the remote control: Grazing on a vast wasteland. NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  5. Benway, J. P. (1998). Banner blindness: The irony of attention grabbing on the world wide web. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 42(5), 463–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Benway, J. P. (1999). Banner blindness: What searching users notice and do not notice on the World Wide Web. Ph.D. Thesis, Rice University, Texas, USA.Google Scholar
  7. Bhattacharjee, A. (2010). Constraints and consequences: Psychological reactance in consumption contexts. Advances in Consumer Research—North American Conference Proceedings, 37, 53–56.Google Scholar
  8. Bonds-Raacke, J., & Raacke, J. (2010). MySpace and Facebook: Identifying dimensions of uses and gratifications for friend networking sites. Individual Differences Research, 8(1), 27–33.Google Scholar
  9. Brehm, S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, S. P., & Stayman, D. M. (1992). Antecedents and consequences of attitude toward the ad: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 19(1), 34–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown, T. J., Rothschild, M. L. (1993). Reassessing the impact of television advertising clutter. Journal of Consumer Research, 138–146.Google Scholar
  12. Burke, R. R., & Srull, T. K. (1988). Competitive interference and consumer memory for advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(1), 55–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chatterjee, P. (2007). Forced vs. voluntary exposure web ads: Immediate and long-term impact of ad avoidance on communication outcomes. Advances in Consumer Research, 34, 304.Google Scholar
  14. Cho, C.-H., & Cheon, H. J. (2004). Why do people avoid advertising on the internet? Journal of Advertising, 33(4), 89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cotte, J., Chowdhury, T. G., Ratneshwar, S., & Ricci, L. M. (2006). Pleasure or utility? Time planning style and web usage behaviors. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 20(1), 45–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cronin, J. J., & Menelly, N. E. (1992). Discrimination vs. Avoidance: “Zipping” of television commercials. Journal of Advertising, 21(2), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ducoffe, R. H. (1996). Advertising value and advertising on the web. Journal of Advertising Research, 36(5), 21–35.Google Scholar
  18. Duff, B. R. L., Faber, R. J. (2008). Ignored ads = liked brands? Advertising avoidance and the affective devaluation of brands. American Academy of Advertising Conference Proceedings, 261.Google Scholar
  19. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Orlando: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers.Google Scholar
  20. Edwards, S. M., Li, H., & Lee, J.-H. (2002). Forced exposure and psychological reactance: Antecedents and consequences of the perceived intrusiveness of pop-up ads. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 83–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Elliott, M. T., & Speck, P. S. (1998). Consumer perceptions of advertising clutter and its impact across various media. Journal of Advertising Research, 38(1), 29–41.Google Scholar
  22. Fuxi, Z., Changsheng, G., & Zhiyi, Y. (2009). Research on intrusiveness model of online advertising based on neural network. Asia-Pacific Conference on Computational Intelligence and Industrial Applications, (PACIIA 2009), 2, 100–103.Google Scholar
  23. Goldfarb, A., & Tucker, C. (2011). Online display advertising: Targeting and obtrusiveness. Marketing Science, 30(3), 389–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ha, L., & Litman, B. R. (1997). Does advertising clutter have diminishing and negative returns? Journal of Advertising, 26(1), 31–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ha, L., & McCann, K. (2008a). An integrated model of advertising clutter in offline and online media. International Journal of Advertising, 27(4), 569–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ha, L. (1996). Observations: Advertising clutter in consumer magazines: Dimensions and effects. Journal of Advertising Research, 36(4), 76–84.Google Scholar
  27. Ha L. (2003). Crossing offline and online media: A comparison of online advertising on TV web sites and online portals. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 3(2). Available at:
  28. Ha, L., & McCann, K. (2008b). An integrated model of advertising clutter in offline and online media. International Journal of Advertising, 27(4), 569–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hammer, P., Riebe, E., & Kennedy, R. (2009). How clutter affects advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research, 49(2), 159–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heeter, C., & Greenberg, B. S. (1985). Profiling the zappers. Journal of Advertising Research, 25(2), 215–219.Google Scholar
  31. Hong, C. P. (2006). An experimental study of persuasion on the internet: A functional approach to attitudes toward internet advertising. Ph.D. Thesis, Florida State University, USA.Google Scholar
  32. Li, H., Edwards, S. M., & Joo-Hyun, L. (2002). Measuring the intrusiveness of advertisements: Scale development and validation. Journal of Advertising, 31(2), 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Li, C., & Meeds, R. (2007). Factors affecting information processing of Internet dvertisements: A test on exposure condition, psychological reactance, and advertising frequency. American Academy of Advertising Conference Proceedings, 93–101.Google Scholar
  34. MacKenzie, S. B., Lutz, R. J., & Belch, G. E. (1986). The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research, 23(May), 130–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. MacKenzie, S. B., & Lutz, R. J. (1989). Am empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 48–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maclnnis, D. J., & Jaworski, B. J. (1989). Information processing from advertisements: Toward an integrative framework. The Journal of Marketing, 53(4), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McCoy, S., Everard, A., Galletta, D., Moody G. (2012). A rational choice theory approach towards a causal model of online advertising intrusiveness and irritation. ECIS 2012 Proceedings.Google Scholar
  38. McCoy, S., Everard, A., Polak, P., & Galletta, D. F. (2007). The effects of online advertising. Communications of the ACM, 50(3), 84–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. McCoy, S., Everard, A., Polak, P., & Galletta, D. F. (2008). An experimental study of antecedents and consequences of online ad intrusiveness. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 24(7), 672–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. McCoy, S., Fernández Robin, C., Cortés, J. L. (2011). Investigating online advertising in chile. In J. A. Jacko (Ed.), Human-computer interaction. users and applications (pp. 255–256). LNCS 6764, Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  41. Milne, G. R., Rohm, A. J., & Bahl, S. (2004). Consumers’ protection of online privacy and identity. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 38(2), 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Moe, W. W. (2006). A field experiment to assess the interruption effect of pop-up promotions. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 20(1), 34–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Morimoto, M., & Chang, S. (2006). Consumers’ attitudes toward unsolicited commercial e-mail and postal direct mail marketing methods: intrusiveness, perceived loss of control, and irritation. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 7(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
  44. Morimoto, M., & Chang, S. (2009). Psychological factors affecting perceptions of unsolicited commercial e-mail. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 31(1), 63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Morimoto, M., & Macias, W. (2009). A conceptual framework for unsolicited commercial e-mail: Perceived intrusiveness and privacy concerns. Journal of Internet Commerce, 8(3–4), 137–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nelson, H. L., & Teeter, D. L. (2001). Law of mass communications: Freedom and control of print and broadcast media (10th ed.). NY: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
  47. Nielsen. (2012). Nielsen global adview Q3. Nielsen Company. Available at:
  48. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasionclassic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque: W.C. Brown Co. Publishers.Google Scholar
  49. Pollay, R. W., & Mittal, B. (1993). Here’s the beef: Factors, determinants, and segments in consumer criticism of advertising. Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 99–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Ray, M. L., & Webb, P. H. (1986). Three prescriptions for clutter. Journal of Advertising Research, 26(1), 69–77.Google Scholar
  51. Riebe, E., & Dawes, J. (2006). Recall of radio advertising in low and high advertising clutter formats. International Journal of Advertising, 25(1), 71–86.Google Scholar
  52. Rotzoll, K. B., Haefner, J. E., & Hall, S. R. (1996). Advertising in contemporary society: Perspectives toward understanding. Urbana and Chicago: Univ of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  53. Roy, S. K. (2009). Internet uses and gratifications: A survey in the Indian context. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(4), 878–886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rubin, A. M. (1983). Television uses and gratifications: The interactions of viewing patterns and motivations. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 27(1), 37–51.Google Scholar
  55. Ruggiero, T. E. (2000). Uses and gratifications theory in the 21st century. Mass Communication and Society, 3(1), 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schneider, W., Dumais, S. T., Shiffrin, R. M. (1982). Automatic/control processing and attention. Technical report, Illinois University Champaign, Human Attention Research Lab.Google Scholar
  57. Sheehan, K. B., & Hoy, M. G. (1999). Flaming, complaining, abstaining: How online users respond to privacy concerns. Journal of Advertising, 28(3), 37–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sipior, J. C., & Ward, B. T. (1995). The ethical and legal quandary of email privacy. Communications of the ACM, 38(12), 48–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Smith, K. T. (2011). Digital marketing strategies that Millennials find appealing, motivating, or just annoying. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 19(6), 489–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith, R. E., & Buchholz, L. M. (1991). Multiple resource theory and consumer processing of broadcast advertisements: An involvement perspective. Journal of Advertising, 20(3), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Speck, P. S., Elliott, M. T. (1997). Predictors of advertising avoidance in print and broadcast media. Journal of Advertising, 26(3), 61–76.Google Scholar
  62. Stafford, T. F., Stafford, M. R., & Schkade, L. L. (2004). Determining uses and gratifications for the internet. Decision Sciences, 35(2), 259–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Stayman, D. M., & Aaker, D. A. (1988). Are all the effects of ad-induced feelings mediated by Aad? Journal of Consumer Research, 15(3), 368–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Truong, Y., & Simmons, G. (2010). Perceived intrusiveness in digital advertising: strategic marketing implications. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 18(3), 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Vakratsas, D., & Ambler, T. (1999). How advertising works: What do we really know? Journal of Marketing, 63(1), 26–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Varnali, K., Yilmaz, C., & Toker, A. (2012). Predictors of attitudinal and behavioral outcomes in mobile advertising: A field experiment. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 11(6), 570–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wehmeyer, K. (2007). Mobile ad intrusiveness–the effects of message type and situation. Proceedings of the 20th bled eConference, June, 4–6.Google Scholar
  68. Wickens, C. D. (1991). Processing resources and attention. In D. Damos (Ed.), Multiple-task performance (pp. 3–34). Washington, DC: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  69. Xu, D. J., Liao, S. S., & Li, Q. (2008). Combining empirical experimentation and modeling techniques: A design research approach for personalized mobile advertising applications. Decision Support Systems, 44(3), 710–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Ying, L., Korneliussen, T., & Grønhaug, K. (2009). The effect of ad value, ad placement and ad execution on the perceived intrusiveness of web advertisements. International Journal of Advertising, 28(4), 623–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zufryden, F. S., Pedrick, J. H., & Sankaralingam, A. (1993). Zapping and its impact on brand purchase behavior. Journal of Advertising Research, 33(1), 58–66.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Francisco Rejón-Guardia
    • 1
    Email author
  • Francisco J. Martínez-López
    • 2
  1. 1.University of GranadaGranadaSpain
  2. 2.University of Granada; and Open University of CataloniaBarcelonaSpain

Personalised recommendations